Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Football

geardaddy

(24,931 posts) Thu Nov 29, 2012, 11:45 AM Nov 2012

Hobart College (my alma mater) is going to the 3rd round

DIII Football!

Go Statesmen!!

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hobart College (my alma mater) is going to the 3rd round (Original Post) geardaddy Nov 2012 OP

I believe they will go home losers Angry Dragon Nov 2012 #1

Probably. geardaddy Nov 2012 #2

Well the DIII championship game getting old in mke Nov 2012 #3

Yep, I saw that. geardaddy Nov 2012 #4

UW Oshkosh is looking to carry the torch for Wisconsin. Goblinmonger Nov 2012 #5

Angry Dragon

(36,693 posts)

1. I believe they will go home losers

Reply to geardaddy (Original post)

Thu Nov 29, 2012, 11:51 AM

Nov 2012

geardaddy

(24,931 posts)

2. Probably.

Reply to Angry Dragon (Reply #1)

Thu Nov 29, 2012, 11:55 AM

Nov 2012

St. Thomas is good.

But if it was lacrosse, Hobart would cream UST.

getting old in mke

(813 posts)

3. Well the DIII championship game

Reply to geardaddy (Original post)

Thu Nov 29, 2012, 12:27 PM

Nov 2012

will have at least one new team this year, after seven years of the same two schools in the game.

Seismic waves spread across Wisconsin as UW-Whitewater lost three times in a year...

geardaddy

(24,931 posts)

4. Yep, I saw that.

Reply to getting old in mke (Reply #3)

Thu Nov 29, 2012, 12:35 PM

Nov 2012

I hope the new team is Hobart obviously, but I'm not counting on it.

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)

5. UW Oshkosh is looking to carry the torch for Wisconsin.

Reply to getting old in mke (Reply #3)

Thu Nov 29, 2012, 02:05 PM

Nov 2012

Will be a tough road, though.

Reply to this discussion