Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Auggie

(31,184 posts)
Tue Feb 3, 2015, 12:19 PM Feb 2015

If that pass had been completed we'd be talking about what a gutsy call Pete Carroll made ...

just like the TD pass he called that ended the first half.

It's too easy to second guess.

Speaking of bad calls ... Greg Roman/Jim Harbaugh (49ers) repeated calls to throw to Michael Crabtree in SB 47 and the 2014 NFC Conference game were far worse IMO.

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

caraher

(6,279 posts)
1. true
Tue Feb 3, 2015, 01:23 PM
Feb 2015

But we'd be wrong

Still, let's also acknowledge that Butler just made a great, great play on the ball. Great recognition, very aggressive move - Wilson made a good throw, and given the situation and route that's probably a TD 8 times out of 10.

What makes it a bad call is that there are too many risks associated with a throw and nothing forcing you to do it. And lots of reason to believe you can pick up a yard on the ground. Sure, if you run and don't pick up the TD you have to burn a time out and throw on 3rd down. But if you still don't pick up the TD (assuming an incomplete pass) you can run any play in your playbook on 4th down. Either way, you're looking at running at least one pass play among the four downs. Your best bet on 2nd & goal on the one is to run the least risky play likely to score a TD, and there are more ways for a pass to turn sour than a run.

Auggie

(31,184 posts)
2. My thread does not debate the decision or explains the play ...
Tue Feb 3, 2015, 03:32 PM
Feb 2015

it points out the hypocrisy of our second-guessing.

I appreciate the response, caraher. But we'd be saying different things had the play succeeded.


TSIAS

(14,689 posts)
3. Of course
Wed Feb 4, 2015, 03:36 PM
Feb 2015

The play call at the end of the first half was different. He had the time to go for a FG had the play not worked.

That pass at the end of the game makes no sense, which is precisely why it has led to so many conspiracy theories. Not just the casual fan, but football people are befuddled over the play call.

There's just too many other bad things (sack, fumble) that could have gone wrong with that play. If he loses because Lynch can't get a yard that's more acceptable than the INT.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
4. Worst case scenario, the Seahawks need 3 plays to get the TD.
Wed Feb 4, 2015, 04:56 PM
Feb 2015

They're going to have to throw on ONE of them, since they only have 1 timeout left. The decision to throw was questionable, but the real issue was Wilson's decision to throw a pass to THAT receiver. If Wilson had rolled out, or looked for a corner fade where he could throw a ball that would either be a TD or INC, I don't think as many people would be talking about what an awful idea it was to pass, because they'd still have 2 more chances from the 1 yard line to run it to Lynch. I wouldn't have screwed around with the pass there, but I can sort of understand the call for a pass. I'd put more of this on Wilson who should have known not to throw THAT pass.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
5. That's a Bevell problem, not a Wilson problem
Wed Feb 4, 2015, 05:28 PM
Feb 2015

That slant has to get out of Wilson's hands pretty quickly to work. And because of that he doesn't do a big drop back so he's not really in a position to buy more time and he's solidly in the pocket so he can't throw it away.

I even get why Caroll called pass play. Pats had their run defense out. Because of course. So a pass makes sense. Why Bevell chose that pass (and we could also discuss that the play is designed to go to a guy who doesn't even have double digit catches) is a fucking mystery. If Bevell calls a roll out, Wilson can ditch the ball if he doesn't have a receiver or he can run it in or he can look for someone else.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
6. If that pass was the primary, it makes no sense...
Wed Feb 4, 2015, 05:46 PM
Feb 2015

and given the type of pass (as you said, needs to be quick), I guess it couldn't be a check-down, so you're right. I was speculating that the receiver was Wilson's choice, but you make a good point. With that kind of play, it had to be the default.

Corner fade would have been okay. Roll out would have been better for pass plays. It wasn't like there was 5 seconds left, so they had plenty of time for a roll out to develop and still get two runs to Lynch in, given they had a timeout.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
14. I agree they should have called a rollout
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 02:54 AM
Feb 2015

but I don't think that the was play call. receivers are running inside slants, its designed to arrive there quick.

Corner fade is tricky but I would have preferred because it is designed to be thrown over the receivers shoulder but I don't think that was the play call. I fault Bevall for the playcall, why do it?

R B Garr

(16,975 posts)
7. Or maybe Bill Belichick knew what the last play was...
Wed Feb 4, 2015, 11:00 PM
Feb 2015

Now where have we heard that before. Hmmmm.

I never paid much attention to SpyGate before, but now I see how it can come into play. Not my thought, but what I've been reading around is that people are suspicious that NE knew what was coming. And they have good reason with NE's history of cheating.

Anyway, I got trolled pretty bad by a creep in the Lounge over a benign comment about Brady not being invincible since I first watched him in Super Bowl 2008. Otherwise, I don't watch NE because they are not near me and I have no history with them whatsoever, but now that I've been trolled by a creepy fan for no reason, I can see why the Pats are hated and suspect (constant controversy).

bluedigger

(17,087 posts)
8. We could be talking about how Belichick just plain outcoached Petey.
Thu Feb 5, 2015, 01:19 AM
Feb 2015

It is possible that he knew what he was doing after all.

Bill Belichick had two timeouts at his disposal when the Seahawks ran the ball on 1st-and-5 with 1:06 left. Lynch rumbled for four yards, giving Seattle second-and-goal from the one-yard line. This was the time that most coaches (and every armchair quarterback) would have basically conceded a Seahawks touchdown and started to call timeouts in hopes of getting the ball back with enough time to make a game-tying field goal.

But, oddly, Belichick didn’t call timeout. He let the Seahawks run the clock all the way down to 0:26, which is when Russell Wilson threw the fateful pass to Ricardo Lockette that was picked off by Pats rookie Malcolm Butler.

Unless you have a DeLorean, flux capacitor, and a crazy, wild-eyed scientist, there’s no way to know what would have happened if Belichick had called timeout with 1:02 left on the clock. But we do know that Seattle was backed into a corner with Belichick’s game of clock chicken.

It starts with Seattle’s lone remaining timeout. If the Seahawks had run on second down with 26 seconds left and not scored a touchdown, they would’ve had to call their final timeout to stop the clock. That almost ensures that both third and fourth down would be passes, a theoretical advantage for New England. (Or it might have had the reverse effect: With New England playing for a pass, there’s more room for Russell Wilson to run.)

But calling timeout back at 1:02 probably likely would have caused Seattle to run the ball on 2nd and 1 to either score a touchdown or flush out Belichick’s final timeout. A pass would have been almost out of the question since it would have stopped the clock with, say, 0:56 remaining and put Seattle into a third down with New England still holding two timeouts. (Although, given Bevell’s night, I suppose every play call, including a punt, was on the table.) The Patriots would have been certain to get the ball back with around 0:45, but with no timeouts.

By the Pats not calling timeout, Seattle had the opportunity to throw the ball without fear of New England regaining possession. In essence, Belichick dared the Seahawks to make the most ill-advised pass in NFL history and the Seahawks were all too happy to comply.

http://ftw.usatoday.com/2015/02/bill-belichick-timeouts-super-bowl-seattle-interception-new-england-patriots-brilliant-seattle-sehawks

Auggie

(31,184 posts)
11. To repeat: I'm not debating the merits/failure of the call ...
Thu Feb 5, 2015, 11:17 AM
Feb 2015

just the reaction to it had it been a success rather than failure.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
12. No, and I wasn't trying to give you shit for it, just saying
Thu Feb 5, 2015, 01:11 PM
Feb 2015

that every time someone refers to a "gutsy call", it's one that most people disagree with at the time, but it ends up working out okay. I actually agree with you completely.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
13. It just seems risky given the situation
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 02:49 AM
Feb 2015

I like a play that buys time but it was a heck of a play by Butler. Inches.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»If that pass had been com...