Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,313 posts)
Sat Jan 7, 2012, 12:06 PM Jan 2012

Opinion: As long as violent checking into the boards

is allowed in professional hockey, It will continue to occur in youth hockey. Since the paralyzing injury to a prep hockey player in Minnesota this week, there's been a lot of talk about instituting new rules for prep hockey. This will not work, until similar rules are applied to professional hockey. Young athletes will emulate the style of play seen in professional hockey, despite new rules.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Opinion: As long as violent checking into the boards (Original Post) MineralMan Jan 2012 OP
Rules will work if they are necessary and enforced, usually. bluedigger Jan 2012 #1
I know the NHL has serious penalties for MineralMan Jan 2012 #2
I'm not sure what your argument is. bluedigger Jan 2012 #3
I hear where you're coming from but Joe Shlabotnik Jan 2012 #4

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
1. Rules will work if they are necessary and enforced, usually.
Sat Jan 7, 2012, 12:38 PM
Jan 2012

You will never get 100% compliance, of course. Humans just aren't like that.

More generally, though, it seems that all "contact" sports are coming under greater scrutiny for acceptable levels of risk of injury. It's certainly visible in the NFL as they continue to adjust rules limiting contact. I think the NHL is still a major injury away from acting.

I'm sorry to hear about the hockey player in MN. It happens too often.

MineralMan

(146,313 posts)
2. I know the NHL has serious penalties for
Sat Jan 7, 2012, 12:53 PM
Jan 2012

checking from behind, but other types of violent checking can be seen in every game. It seems to me that prep players may not discriminate as well, from lack of experience. The current rule proposals being talked about in Minnesota, following that boy's injuries, address the kind of penalties that can be assessed in cases where checking from behind occurs. And, yet, during a game less than a week later, there was a very serious check on a player after play had stopped. That led to a fight on the ice and several players were ejected. It looked a lot like a typical NHL fight.

Rules are not always the answer, sadly. Youth players will emulate the behavior they see in professional sports. That will not change, rules or no rules.

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
3. I'm not sure what your argument is.
Sat Jan 7, 2012, 01:28 PM
Jan 2012

You are conflating a few things here, and that may be ok, as they may relate to one another. Should we not play hockey because it is inherently violent? That seems to be where you headed to me.

College hockey is my favorite, because fighting isn't tolerated. It makes for a better game. Say what you will about the ncaa (I'm no fan), but in this case, it has had a positive influence on sports.

Joe Shlabotnik

(5,604 posts)
4. I hear where you're coming from but
Sat Jan 7, 2012, 02:02 PM
Jan 2012

what is 'violent' checking? Obviously hitting from behind is wrong as is boarding, but most checks in hockey along the boards look and sound far worse than they really are. Sadly injuries do happen, and young men with big aspirations, and hormones raging and adrenaline rushing will make poor decisions, BUT Accidents will happen in any contact sport. Personally I'm not fan of changing more NHL rules.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»Opinion: As long as viole...