Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Auggie

(31,207 posts)
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 11:02 AM Aug 2012

NFLPA Director criticizes NFL; would not rule out players strike

espn.com news services / 8-29-12

NFL Players Association executive director DeMaurice Smith called the league's lockout of officials "absurd" and would not rule out a players strike.

In a recent interview with SI.com, Smith cited widespread concerns over players' long-term health, claiming that replacement referees have created an environment that jeopardizes player safety.

"In America it is the employer's obligation to provide as safe a working environment as possible," Smith told the website. "We believe that if the National Football League fails in that obligation, we reserve the right to seek any relief that we believe is appropriate. The NFL has chosen to prevent the very officials that they have trained, championed and cultivated for decades to be on the field to protect players and -- by their own admission -- further our goal of enhanced safety. That is absurd on its face."

Despite receiving vocal support from commissioner Roger Goodell, replacement referees have been criticized throughout the preseason. Smith blamed the NFL for the impasse with the officials, claiming that the league has prioritized financial concerns over player safety.

MORE: http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/8313071/nflpa-executive-director-demaurice-smith-blasts-league-locking-refs

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NFLPA Director criticizes NFL; would not rule out players strike (Original Post) Auggie Aug 2012 OP
Seems Like Grandstanding By Smith ProfessorGAC Aug 2012 #1
I sort of agree JonLP24 Aug 2012 #3
And if it's true that the scabs are earning only one quarter of the regular refs rocktivity Aug 2012 #2
we're not talking enormously large money anyway. hughee99 Aug 2012 #4

ProfessorGAC

(65,240 posts)
1. Seems Like Grandstanding By Smith
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 11:47 AM
Aug 2012

I'm not taking the league's side, but i cannot believe the players would strike over this. This just seems like posturing in the interest of him helping another guild's executive director.
GAC

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
3. I sort of agree
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 10:24 PM
Aug 2012

My gut feeling is the players probably won't strike but I'm looking at it like a poker match w/ the NFL -- they are bluffing in hopes the NFL settles. I support them doing this if that's what they are doing and I hope it works but Roger Goodell has a degree in economics(though he does it the right wing way--takes the action that makes the most money and anti-labor but eventually crashes)so he knows what he is doing unfortunately. Look at all the stadiums that have been renovated and built since he took over as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Office and then Commissioner. Master of the all-or-nothing approach and even uses the Super Bowl extortion.

on edit-I wanted to ad but didn't know where to fit. Tagliabue is a lawyer so his area was policies for workforce and making sure the NFL operates within the law.

rocktivity

(44,580 posts)
2. And if it's true that the scabs are earning only one quarter of the regular refs
Wed Aug 29, 2012, 06:34 PM
Aug 2012

doesn't that make them more bribe-able?


rocktivity

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
4. we're not talking enormously large money anyway.
Fri Aug 31, 2012, 11:44 AM
Aug 2012

Yes, $150k is great money (roughly the average for the regular refs), but if you're a gambler who can make hundreds of thousands on a game, $25-50k is pocket change for you, but still a huge amount of money for the ref.

IMHO, people who are going to take bribes are likely going to take them anyway. Paying someone more won't make them less corrupt. There are probably some very extreme exceptions for this (need a lot of money fast for child's live saving medical treatment), but I'll bet those are pretty rare cases for bribery.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»NFLPA Director criticizes...