Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Auggie

(31,173 posts)
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 09:21 AM Jul 2012

Jim Thome passes Sosa* on all-time MLB HR list

Number 610. Against his old team, Cleveland.

CLEVELAND -- To Jim Thome, helping Baltimore win its third straight game meant more than hitting his 610th home run.

Thome move past Sammy Sosa into seventh place on the career homers list and the Orioles beat Cleveland 10-2 on Friday night.

The 41-year-old Thome got his historic home run with a towering 418-foot shot off Derek Lowe (8-8) to open the fourth inning.

LINK: http://scores.espn.go.com/mlb/recap?gameId=320720105

The Top Ten

1. Barry Bonds 762*
2. Hank Aaron 755
3. Babe Ruth 714
4. Willie Mays 660
5. Alex Rodriguez 643* (active)
6. Ken Griffey 630
7. Jim Thome 610 (active)
8. Sammy Sosa 609*
9. Frank Robinson 586
10. Mark McGwire 583*


14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jim Thome passes Sosa* on all-time MLB HR list (Original Post) Auggie Jul 2012 OP
I expect flames JonLP24 Jul 2012 #1
"I did take a banned substance" — Rodriguez Auggie Jul 2012 #3
I didn't dispute that he took a banned substance JonLP24 Jul 2012 #5
All 4 deserve asteriks... joeybee12 Jul 2012 #2
Thome hung around a lot longer than I ever expected. bluedigger Jul 2012 #4
Any chance Thome ever juiced? Ter Jul 2012 #6
It's possible with most anyone who played through that era. bluedigger Jul 2012 #7
I think he did. Look at his rookie pictures and what he became. Capt. America Jul 2012 #8
He's never tested positive. Not even a hint. Auggie Jul 2012 #9
They didn't test before 2004 Ter Jul 2012 #10
"Never in their class" Auggie Jul 2012 #11
So says anyone Ter Jul 2012 #12
As a home run hitter, sure ... Auggie Jul 2012 #13
I don't think he's as good as the others in the clean 600+ club Ter Jul 2012 #14

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
1. I expect flames
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 09:27 AM
Jul 2012

I understand mental asterisks like I do for belly putters but can't support an official asterisk for Rodriguez. He is still playing and they are letting him still play so putting an official asterisk for Rodriguez strikes me as wrong.

Sorry to distract from Thome's achievements, regarding Rodriguez it is something I thought about for quite awhile. I guess I'd would support official asterisks for those that violated the performance enhancing policies the 3 times which doesn't apply to most of those on the list since they came before drug testing.

Auggie

(31,173 posts)
3. "I did take a banned substance" — Rodriguez
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 10:29 AM
Jul 2012

For three years while with the Texas Rangers.

"Can I have an edge just to get out there and play every day?" he said to himself.

Stats (as of 2009):

'01-03 / Other 10 Seasons
Games/season / 161.7 / 148.4
Batting avg. / .305 / .309
Homers/season / 52.0 / 39.2
Slugging / .615 / .574

LINK: http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3894847

Distinct difference in stats plus the guilty plea. IMO it's not fair to place him above Griffey, Frank Robinson and Harmon Killebrew without an asterisk, active or not.

No flames.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
5. I didn't dispute that he took a banned substance
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 04:16 PM
Jul 2012

It's just that they are still letting him play. This is all hypothetical but I'm speaking on anything officially in regards to him. We're free to place asterisks in our mind like I do for the Belly Putt or the 1925 Chicago Cardinals Championship.

Plus I'm under the impression the drug tests were for research purposes and were promised no punishments and no appeal process. He did admit to it but for that to happen officially.

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
7. It's possible with most anyone who played through that era.
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 09:07 AM
Jul 2012

If you look at his stats though, they seem to rise and fall appropriately with his age. I don't think so.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/t/thomeji01.shtml

Auggie

(31,173 posts)
9. He's never tested positive. Not even a hint.
Wed Jul 25, 2012, 03:13 PM
Jul 2012

I went through this with Upton a few years ago.

Ruth, Aaron, Mays, Killebrew, Griffey -- all had ups and down in numbers through their career due to injury. If Ruth and Mays could hit over 600 home runs without using steroids (in fewer games, too), why can't Jim Thome?

Some guys can just play.

 

Ter

(4,281 posts)
10. They didn't test before 2004
Wed Jul 25, 2012, 03:24 PM
Jul 2012

Those were his best years. Unlike the others you mentioned, Thome was never in their class.

 

Ter

(4,281 posts)
12. So says anyone
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 09:34 AM
Jul 2012

You seriously think Thome is in the same class as Ruth, Mays, Aaron, and Griffey?

Edit: Kilibrew I'll give you.

Auggie

(31,173 posts)
13. As a home run hitter, sure ...
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 11:04 AM
Jul 2012

He's seventh on the all-time list, fifth if not counting known steroid users. If you don't think that achievement earns him mention in the same company I'd like to hear your reasons.

Two things I'll give you: he never played on a championship team and many years were spent in small market Cleveland. Had he played for the Yankees he'd be a fucking god.

 

Ter

(4,281 posts)
14. I don't think he's as good as the others in the clean 600+ club
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 08:35 AM
Jul 2012

Take the known clean ones. Griffey, Mays, Ruth, Aaron. Do you think he belongs in that group? All around, he's the worst of the 5, followed by Jr., Aaron, Mays, and Ruth, in my opinion. He was so quiet compared to rest, almost like he was under the radar. He's good but just not like those four.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»Jim Thome passes Sosa* on...