Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yavin4

(35,442 posts)
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 12:46 PM Jul 2012

The New BCS Playoff System and Paying Players

Now that the BCS has a playoff system, I predict that the championship may get as big as, if not bigger than, the Superbowl in terms of ratings and TV deals. Additionally, the site of the game will be award based on bidding by different venues, and not a traditional bowl site.

In sum, there will be massive amounts of additional revenue heading to the NCAA which brings up a point that no one in the media seems to be addressing. How can the NCAA generate all of this additional revneue, and not pay the players?

The total amount of the NCAA's various TV deals and national championship deals may be on par, if not more, than the NFL's deals, and yet the players won't be paid???

This seems a little obscene and unfair. I propose paying the players a fixed amount, say $100,000 per athlete, if their teams make it into the playoffs and championship games. I believe that their scholarships do cover regular season games, but they should be compensated for playoffs and a championship, which are in addition to their regular season obligations.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The New BCS Playoff System and Paying Players (Original Post) Yavin4 Jul 2012 OP
Honestly, I think they should be paid, VWolf Jul 2012 #1
Agree...just forget college football...it has no semblance to amateur sports anymore... joeybee12 Jul 2012 #3
I think you still need to tie each team to a school. There's too much history there. VWolf Jul 2012 #4
Agree JonLP24 Jul 2012 #2

VWolf

(3,944 posts)
1. Honestly, I think they should be paid,
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 12:56 PM
Jul 2012

but not be required to attend college. If they choose to do so, they can, but they don't have to.

May as well, at this point, turn the whole thing into a farm system.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
3. Agree...just forget college football...it has no semblance to amateur sports anymore...
Sat Jul 14, 2012, 07:53 AM
Jul 2012

Make them go to AAA before they go to the NFL.

VWolf

(3,944 posts)
4. I think you still need to tie each team to a school. There's too much history there.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:43 PM
Jul 2012

However, they really need to be completely separate financial entities.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
2. Agree
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 11:46 PM
Jul 2012

Though not sure about implementation. I personally feel the athletes should have the same labor rights all Americans have so I feel it should be the same as hiring coaches. Schools compete for the services w/ varying offers. If fixed amounts (I see it as a bonus payment - I'm not sure how it is applied legally) are anything like salary caps you need a union - which is why owners in professional sports embrace unions.

W/ my proposal though a lot of schools will quickly dry up financially but anti-trust violations(they would be anti-trust violations in any other business except for college athletics) shouldn't be ignored to ensure firms stay viable.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»The New BCS Playoff Syste...