African American
Related: About this forumMy Son Arraigned this morning on a drug paraphernalia charge
They said they found a pipe in a bush he was sitting near after a Terry stop. I don't believe it was his pipe. These Terry stops are so crazy.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)but I am positive he isn't stupid enough to carry something like that to go buy cigarettes
bravenak
(34,648 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)same cop has stopped him several times he know him
bravenak
(34,648 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)The street he was driving on it would be almost impossible to see someone throw something in that bush especially at night.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)That sounds stupid
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)he will just get a fine I am not ready for that cause he will have a record and more reason for police to mess with him
steve2470
(37,457 posts)I've strongly emphasized to my son the necessity of having a clean criminal record, and if you can afford it somehow, I'd get the DNA test and maybe think about another lawyer. Lawyers are damn expensive I know, so, I can understand if you can't do that.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)I fully understand the reasons you would prefer that your son not plead to this. Our first reaction is generally to want to go the whole 9 yards and vindicate our rights in court. But you need to take into account some of the harsh realities of the situation. What is your son's exposure IF he goes to trial and is then found guilty. Many of us have unrealistic expectations about how a jury will behave, particularly in a relatively minor criminal case. Judges hate these cases, since they just add to an already bloated criminal docket. And the Prosecutor may well see the chance to pick up a new scalp for his/her collection, particularly if close to re-election.
Discuss all these issues with your attorney before you make any final decision, including his/her honest assessment of your son's likelihood of success if this goes to trial. Assuming you've selected an experienced qualified attorney his/her frank opinion about success should be given a lot of weight.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)I will certainly consider your input but ultimately it's up to him he is 21 he works and goes to college. He is basically a very honest good young man.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)But you and I were once 21 and I for one do remember being much more impulsive then than I am today. He's dealing with a whole bunch of unknowns here which involve his pride among other emotional factors. That usually doesn't help in making the best possible decision. A different point of view on the subject from his Father wouldn't hurt. But, as you rightly say, in the final analysis it's his decision.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)maybe he will have a different take on things than me. I hope this doesn't effect my son's ability to land a good job after college.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Papers now, im old.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Response to rbrnmw (Reply #5)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Kind of Blue
(8,709 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)I am sure it wasn't his
scscholar
(2,902 posts)don't even need PC for a Terry Stop!
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)it's nonsense
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)was he "seen" tossing the pipe?
Did he drop dirty?
In order to gain a conviction, the prosecution must prove possession or control of the location the pipe was found. Being here it, especially, in out door space, is not enough.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)they darn well better find his fingerprints on it, to show that he was the one that 'threw' it.
And how convenient to be stopping people by bushes that just might happen to have pipes in them.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)he was wearing gloves cause it was cold out but if he had it before he left here his prints should still be on it
LiberalArkie
(15,719 posts)Only it he is really telling you the truth. You might just ask him "If we should get a DNA test on it?"
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)LiberalArkie
(15,719 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)so he has no reason to lie about whether it was his or not to me
LiberalArkie
(15,719 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)I think we all had those moments
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)steve2470
(37,457 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Somehow the public defender got the paraphernalia itself excluded so I never actually found out what it was (the prosecutor actually kept going, and I'm pretty sure it's that the spoons in the guys kitchen were burnt). That was a pretty easy acquittal for all of us. Here's hoping.
So sorry.
Deny and Shred
(1,061 posts)When we consider the limited funds for any investigstion, then consider the amount spent on this sort of ridiculousness, then the paltry funds for left for proper investigations of real criminal activity, then we see the true crime.
Many good practical suggestions upthread. My best, and my condolences.
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)the officer didn't see shit.
How far away was he?
How fast was he going?
How thick was the traffic?
How many other people were around?
Was the pipe photographed in place undisturbed?
Considering the officer already had repeated contact with your son...
What were the outcomes from the contacts with your son? Is there a pattern?
How many other incidents similar to this are in the officer's history?
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)I will be asking the attorney to ask these very questions. He is a PD so I am not sure how much time he will put into finding the answer to these questions. My husband wants to get him a paid criminal defense attorney.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)((hugs))
brewens
(13,595 posts)the benefit of the doubt. We were questioning everything the cops had. It turned out the kid was running a clinic on what not to do when out on parole on a meth conviction! I mean he didn't give his lawyer a chance. The lawyer interviewed me after the verdict. They do that to help see where they went wrong. He picked me because he could probably tell I was somewhat sympathetic and taking notes and all that.
I told him he did a great job! He actually scored a major coup getting this k-9 officer to admit that sometimes a drug dog will give a false alert! That shook up the prosecution enough to recall the k-9 cop to come in and attempt to walk that back! I wonder how many times THAT has happened in a drug case?
If you took it to court and you had our jury, with what you're saying being true, no freakin' chance we convict. Unless the cops have a good match on prints from the pipe. That would be asking a lot from some styles of pipes I'm familiar with.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)it had residue in it supposedly
brewens
(13,595 posts)They are just that small. It's not like holding a wine glass or something like that. You'd only ever be touching them in the first place with a small part of two fingers maybe. No way they would lift a really sweet full print off of them under the best conditions.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)so they are just going to say they couldn't lift prints. I am sure the cop will be believed over my son.
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)It's also a sign of moral bankruptcy.
And it's based on racism and social control in its entirety.
From the opium war against China, where East India Co. imposed China their opium as they seized the opium market. The drug of choice was opium among the upper cass. Gin was prohibited back in England at the same time as when Lord Byron was chasing dragons in his castle
to
persecuting opium smoking Chinese railroad workers (white, middle class women had their herion from the pharmacy)
to
Harry Anslingers war on cannabis in the 30s (after his failed crusade against booze in the 20's) to scapegoat Mexicans and African Americans
to Nixon's intensification of prohibition to rid himself of political opponents. Bringing down African Americans was to him just a bonus.
There was a thaw for a little while when Carter sought to decrimkinalize it and legalize it on state level.
Then we have Reagan who stole the election in 1980 (same tactics as Nixon in 1968) who spoke of "freedom and liberty" and "personal responsbility", "taking government off your backs" and really started the war on drugs while Bush srs CIA smuggled in tons of Cocaine, spread it in African American neighborhoods, and gave DEA a green light. Nancy Reagan had her own skit in this.
What Reagan and Bush did was practically promoting Cocaine by telling people about it before it became mainstream.
That war on drugs continued in the 90s, and "3 strikes, you're out" policy, effectivelly opening to incarcerate a pot smoker for being caught three times for the rest of his life.
And now, this...
If I didn't know better, I would think this is the kind of thing only happening in Stalin's Russia.
womanofthehills
(8,718 posts)Residue of marijuana a crime?? It's almost unbelievable in 2016.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)I suggest you make a checklist of questions to discuss with your son, the lawyer and your son's dad. Just the beginning of such a list, here's some things I'd want to know:
What percentage of those cases in your area actually go to trial?
Of those that go to trial, what percentage result in acquittals / convictions?
What's the likelihood, if he wants to go to trial, that the State will drop this stupid case?
Were there other people nearby who could have thrown the pipe?
Were there any witnesses to this incident and what do they say?
At what point are you entitled to review all of the evidence?
What is the possible composition of the jury, should it go to trial?
Is it the type of area where they are likely to disbelieve a police person's story, or disbelieve it? Many areas they tend to believe police. Some areas, they most certainly don't. Those latter areas, the district attorney's office is more likely to drop the case than proceed to trial.
It's important to get a decent handle on this because it's significant as to whether your son should plead out or not.
What exactly is the evidence besides just the officer(s) word? What is the physical evidence in terms of fingerprints, dna, potential witnesses, etc.
What is all the reasonable doubt that can be brought forward to convince a jury to acquit, or more preferably for the State to drop its case?
Do the specific police officers involved have any record of bad dealings in the past?
How is the public defender, in terms of what others say about him or her?
What does the public defender recommend, in terms of pleading out or going to trial, about all the possibilities above?
That's just a few things I'd want to know before hiring a private criminal lawyer.
And when considering hiring a criminal lawyer, before hiring him or her I'd want to know:
Can they limit their costs? If so how?
What is their advice?
What is their success rate?
Can the dad reasonably afford it?
If the answer is yes, what can the criminal attorney provide that the public defender can't, especially in terms of likelihood of getting all charges dropped?
What is their answer to all the questions above?
Make sure you get a free consultation first before deciding to hire them.
There's a lot of other good advice on this thread. I hope this helps a bit in formulating questions that help you and your son and his father make some good informed decisions. The more informed you are, the better you can weigh your options and reduce the risks.
Good luck!
Number23
(24,544 posts)This is so incredibly kind of you. All of the advice here is so wonderful. So freely given and so generous.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)Many excellent thoughts on this thread.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)We're not criminal lawyers in his jurisdiction. But we are friends who can share what we know and provide friendship. I'm furious that these ridiculous cases even exist. Thankfully there's many out here in cyberspace who feel the same and can offer words of support & encouragement.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts):loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya:
:loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya:
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)Thanks JAG.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)I can only offer my support at this time.
Digital Puppy
(496 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)So many great responses in this thread.
Thanks for all the friends in this great group!
Kind of Blue
(8,709 posts)for advice like this. It would have helped to keep better organized in many areas. This is priceless information.
Thank you.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)You're welcome KoB.
Thanks to everyone in this thread and group. I'm grateful for the warmth & camaraderie here.
Number23
(24,544 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)he & you may consider adding to a checklist:
If your son pleads, can he plead down to something not involving a felony?
In other words, something that he does not have to put on a job application?
And if that occurs, can he get a written promise as to the exact date that it will be expunged completely from the record?
I suggest asking these questions because there may be some way that so long as there are no other incidents, for a certain period of time, he may have it completely expunged from the record.
Just an aside here rbrnmw. I've read and heard people say that if every one of these stupid cases were taken to trial it would clog up the court system and that would be great. But it's easy to sit here encouraging this because it's easier said than done, because we're not the ones taking the risks. I know you and your son and his father will gather enough to make reasoned & strong decisions. Especially your son.
The more information he can gather, especially from the public defender and a possible criminal lawyer and anyone else who is most familiar with your jurisdiction, the better he'll be able to make good decisions that minimize his risk and be confident with his decisions going forward.
That's not to say he shouldn't take it to trial and hope for dropped charges or an acquittal. There might also be a way to plead nolo contendre (not admitting guilt or innocence). Things are negotiable in different ways in different jurisdictions, depending on the court backlog, the budget and political nature of the district attorney's office, the tenor of what happens if these cases are taken to trial, the nature of how charges can be dropped and other factors he can and should research before making well-informed decisions.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)And your family <3
I did not even know what a Terry stop was before today and I am disgusted by that. It's a green light for cops to do whatever they want.
Lisa D
(1,532 posts)Please let us know if there is ANYTHING we can do to help.