African American
Related: About this forumEx-NAACP Head Ben Jealous: Sanders is Most Consistent Candidate Tackling Racism, Militarism & Greed
(cross-posted in GD: P)
Likening him to Jesse Jackson in the 1980s, former NAACP President Benjamin Jealous praises Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders for consistently addressing the issues that Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. referred to as the "giant triplets of evil"racism, militarism and greed. We speak to Jealous in North Carolina. He was just in South Carolina campaigning for Sanders ahead of that states primary.
more...
http://www.democracynow.org/2016/2/9/ex_naacp_head_ben_jealous_sanders
Ben Jealous, former head of the NAACP, officially endorsed Bernie Sanders on Friday, drawing parallels between the ideals of the Vermont senator and those of Martin Luther King Jr.
I recall the words of the late great Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., who said a genuine leader is not a searcher for consensus but a molder of consensus, Jealous said in a press call organized by the Sanders campaign. And that brings me to why I'm here today. Bernie Sanders has been a principled, courageous, insistent fighter against the evils that Dr. King referred to as the giant triplets of racism, militarism and greed.
Jealous said Sanders meets Kings definition of a great leader and cited that as the reason he has the best chance to beat the Republican nominee in a general election. Bernie Sanders is running a positive, principled, people-powered campaign and steadily molded consensus across our nation at such a high level that the polls now say he's hands down the candidate for beating any of the potential Republican nominees at the polls next fall, he said.
more...
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/bernie-sanders-ben-jealous-endorsement-218734
Number23
(24,544 posts)for office. That always gives me the warm and fuzzy impression that their purpose for posting in here is a reflection of their genuine concern for the AA community.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Sigh. Expect that flood to start any minute...
(That said, I have tremendous respect for Mr. Jealous, and I think this is one of Sanders's more solid endorsements.)
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Kind of Blue
(8,709 posts)As if we didn't see this exactly a week ago.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Apparently we didn't show proper fealty or fall in line fast enough when we all saw this story. Over a week ago.
We really, really need to do better around here with our falling in line.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)Could you show me where it was previously discussed here? The reason I posted is it seems relevant.
Kind of Blue
(8,709 posts)taken a little time during that search to read how we feel. One of the most obvious repeated sentiments is that we don't need unwarranted, constant feedback from especially Bernie supporters "enlightening" us on news about African-American politics, as if we aren't capable of keeping abreast of politics that concerns us.
So no, it was probably not posted because WE KNOW already and we're evaluating the pros and cons of each one. Just because we're not talking particularly of an endorsement that gets you excited, doesn't mean that you should assume that we don't know what's happening.
I can't believe you're that unaware.
Stellar
(5,644 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Did you cross post this?
I have that group as well as HRC in my trash list - so I can't see it.
Can you link to your op there?
I'd like to see the responses.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)From having your group on trash - I also have several keywords on trash so I can silence the noise.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Im thinking he's blocked from your group?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/118739290#post10
Post that too.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Funny - I just bumped up two posts on Tamir Rice and your silence prior to your electioneering speaks volumes.
Funny - you Bernie's cant be imposed upon yet you are allowed to drop your pants and shit on us.
Funny how it's okay for you to come antagonize the House Negros as St Catherina calls us.
Isn't that funny?
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)Digital Puppy
(496 posts)I thought it was telling that you just plopped an article down over here with no commentary or courage to follow up.
*This* could be the reason you feel out of sorts....By the way, I feel that you are the rude one.
Welcome to the DU Public Park!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/118739414
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Who blocked 1strongblackman? You should ask around.
Awful lot of people on your blocked members list.
246 -Congratulations!
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)<snip>
"Respectfully, if that is your position, then I will talk only to white people about how we are going to deal with the very real problems," Clinton snapped.
Digital Puppy
(496 posts)You really need to just say the words on your mind because there might other be people like me who think you are trying to start "some mess".
Care to explain that last statement and why it is I shouldn't hit the alert button???
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)The difference between them and you and so many of the other Bernie supporters you say that we are "hostile" towards is that they have always participated in this forum and have always been friends to the AA posters here and have cared about the AA community.
They don't drop in with bullshit that we've all seen two weeks ago and act like its news. And they don't pop in to this forum for the first time to sing the unending and numerous glories of Bernie Sanders. They are HERE when we talk about Tamir Rice, discrimination in housing, media etc. They are HERE. Which is exactly why they are welcome and don't get the reception that you got.
Please just stay away from this forum. Thanks.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)It's a witch hunt. THAT'S why you posted this. To try to find people supporting Hillary! Well played sir - well played.
35. So, are you supporting Hillary in the primary, or planning to write in Malcom X?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1213323
<snip>
"Respectfully, if that is your position, then I will talk only to white people about how we are going to deal with the very real problems," Clinton snapped.
Now - if instead of invading - you had read, familiarized yourself with the group - you would find that I think they are both shitty candidates and I won't be voting in the June Primary at all.
So in your brain it's either -
We are supporting Hillary Clinton
Or
Writing in Malcolm X - who I'm sorry um -
I don't know if you know this. He's dead electric monk. I know it's sad - but it happened before I was even born.
Anything else you would like to know? Like how much I respect Corey Booker and think he is amazing?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/presidential-campaign/237506-why-americans-should-consider-omalley-for-president
http://bluenationreview.com/top-reasons-vote-hillary/
http://www.examiner.com/list/ten-reasons-not-to-vote-for-bernie-sanders
No need to thank me ... Your Welcome!
Digital Puppy
(496 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)Ain't gonna happen.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)To the block. He's a disruptor who has two set of rules of conduct.
When I look at regular posters here, who is blocked there - and the posts about the number of alerts in the AfAm Group the past 24 hours -
It's malicious intent. Group Host - I'm calling it - he a disruptor.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Wonder if the p'ming about antagonizing us is still going on?
We are going to have to be vigilant.
Number23
(24,544 posts)And a shit load more could have and probably should have been blocked but we just haven't been in a blocking mood lately. I'm speaking of one of their illustrious hosts that made a grand appearance here not too long ago and wisely ducked the fuck out when the "Awww HELL NAWS!!!" from the regulars here got going.
You're right. We have been really understanding lately but that may not last too much longer.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Seems to drag them without breaking TOS. I floated an idea last night just to see what others thought. I got a few responses that indicated that people are reading and responding to these threads in ways which allow them to laugh at the posters.
I point blank admitted to 1Strong I was clowning someone the other day.
And I'm sure you can find my post yesterday where I do my - read 2 or 3 sentences, ID nonsense, then respond in kind.
That was yesterday.
And yep - the host op - I wonder if they just like it in the 'house' better? We have people to fan you in here! where's Calvin Candie when you need him?
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)work that way.
Sanders has to earn the vote. He hasn't earned my vote. Not at all. And his fanatics have been so rude and insulting that I am turned off from Sanders completely. They are worse than Hillary supporters were in 2008. Despicable in fact.
Digital Puppy
(496 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)and at least 3 of which have been banned from here.
Kind of Blue
(8,709 posts)something like the big Stop Sign message before posting in the GD: Primaries. STOP: if this is about who endorsed Bernie or what he's done for us or against Hillary, or something like that.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)it's more fun to watch them get politely but savagely owned. And they know the drill, too. Probably why they are dropping threads here and rec'ing them, but don't show up to actually debate.
Kind of Blue
(8,709 posts)it's more fun to watch them get politely but savagely owned."
You're bad and I like it. But you're right, they're asking for it.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Kind of Blue
(8,709 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)1. Great post first time poster. This makes me want to tell people if they worked hard they could make decent money and not be so poor.
2. He has to earn my vote.
3. You really care! You love us! You love us!