Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mopinko

(70,117 posts)
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 11:41 AM Oct 2012

name that weed

can someone identify this weed? it appears to be something in the nightshade family, and i wonder if the chickens could eat it. obviously leery. but they have picked my yard pretty clean, and i am looking to weeds at the farm that i can harvest. these are kinda plentiful. the berries are purple when they ripen.




xpost from gardening.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
name that weed (Original Post) mopinko Oct 2012 OP
some kind of solanaceae Kali Oct 2012 #1
Black Nightshade Denninmi Nov 2012 #2
i keep them away from it- it probably cuts down on eggs or makes them taste funny farminator3000 Jan 2013 #3
thanks. mopinko Jan 2013 #4

Kali

(55,012 posts)
1. some kind of solanaceae
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 12:16 PM
Oct 2012

nightshade/potato/tomato family

edit d'oh - I didn't read, just looked at image, you already figured that out

I would check with somebody local (extension agent, master gardner) some of those things are pretty toxic for mammals, no idea about chickens, although birds can eat a lot of stuff. our three local weeds in that family don't get eaten by much of anything (a couple ground cherries and datura)

farminator3000

(2,117 posts)
3. i keep them away from it- it probably cuts down on eggs or makes them taste funny
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 07:46 PM
Jan 2013

. . . the comparable number of accounts reporting that these species [Solanum nigrum] are harmless as food and fodder sources suggest that this toxicity is variable. Indeed a chemical suvey of various members of the section Solanum reported the presence of potentially toxic alkaloids only in unripe fruits, with ripe berries and vegetative parts tacking these compounds. Shilling et al. (1992) therefore concluded that the plants are probably only poisonous to indiscriminate feeders such as livestock who might consume the whole plant. However, these plants are browsed and used as fodder for animals without any detrimental effect in some areas, and Rogers and Ogg (1981) suggested that the development of toxic levels of these alkaloids is dependent on their growth under certain conditions or in certain localities, and even on the age of the plants concerned. Other reports suggest that the amounts of poisonous ‘princinples’ vary greatly with climate, season and soil type (Cooper and Johnson 1984). It is highly probable that boiling destroys any toxicity inherent in these species; most ethonobotanical reports of their use as vegetables refer to cooking, boiling and even repeated boiling with the liquid being discarded; similar reports of the use of berries also refer to their being poisonous when uncooked or unripe. Drying, however, does not destroy the toxicity of the solamine-type alkaloids (Everist 1974). It is these glycosidal alkaloids which are responsible for the bitter taste often associated with the Solanums.
http://www.rootsimple.com/2011/11/deadly-nightshade-vs-black-nightshade/

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Rural/Farm Life»name that weed