Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 08:39 AM Oct 2013

Navy's giant, stealthy new destroyer gets hull wet

http://hamptonroads.com/2013/10/navys-giant-stealthy-new-destroyer-gets-hull-wet



Our new $5~$7 billion dollar stealth destroyer

Navy's giant, stealthy new destroyer gets hull wet
The Associated Press
© October 29, 2013

BATH, Maine

There was no band. No streamers. No champagne.

The Navy's stealthy Zumwalt destroyer floated out of dry dock without fanfare Monday night and into the waters of the Kennebec River, where the warship will remain dockside for final construction.

The largest destroyer ever built for the Navy, the Zumwalt looks like no other U.S. warship, with an angular profile and clean carbon fiber superstructure that hides antennas and radar masts.

"The Zumwalt is really in a league of its own," said defense consultant Eric Wertheim, author of the "The Naval Institute Guide to Combat Fleets of the World."



unhappycamper comment: "The Zumwalt is really in a league of its own..." Indeed it is. This is the first destroyer to cost more than a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Navy's giant, stealthy new destroyer gets hull wet (Original Post) unhappycamper Oct 2013 OP
Construction cost only half that. HooptieWagon Oct 2013 #1
 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
1. Construction cost only half that.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:14 AM
Oct 2013

The remainder is the R&D cost, which soared per vessel when the order was reduced from 10 ships to 3. Operating costs are projected to be much lower than current destroyers due to small crew requirements and efficient power system.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Veterans»Navy's giant, stealthy ne...