Romney's Defense Proposals -- More Troops, Bigger Navy -- 'Mostly Bluster'
http://defense.aol.com/2012/10/24/romneys-defense-proposals-more-men-bigger-navy-mostly-b/
Romney's Defense Proposals -- More Troops, Bigger Navy -- 'Mostly Bluster'
By Rachel Kleinfeld
Published: October 24, 2012
While the politicization of four American deaths in Libya has some of the media distracted, those of us who care about defense need to look past the hype. The "he-said, she-said" accusations on the Libyan tragedy are obscuring major differences between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama on defense spending and strategy.
President Obama's goals are pretty clear. His main focus is ensuring that we have a strong economy to maintain American strength, so he is trying to keep non-stimulus spending down. He sees our future threats lying in Asia, and wants to rebalance more resources there. And he wants to invest in new energy sources so we move away from oil, and stop being dragged into endless Middle Eastern conflicts.
That means his plan actually expands defense spending overall, which will rise with the rate of inflation. But Obama will be cutting the rate of growth we've been on during the post 9/11 era, taking out $487 billion in projected spending. Troop strength would go from 1.42 million to 1.32 million while drones and other people-saving equipment would likely expand. It's a typical no-drama Obama plan, one that focuses on the important (China, the economy) instead of the urgent (anything in the Middle East), and makes no lobbying group happy a tough sell for a politician.
~snip~
Strategy starts by looking at our threats and opportunities, then matches spending to our global ambitions. Pulling numbers out of a hat whether to chop the Pentagon or raise the base budget is no way to make these judgment calls. But conservative hawks and small-government aficionados are playing chicken with the Pentagon budget. And chicken-hawk Romney is not the man to call them on it.