Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,899 posts)
Fri Feb 20, 2015, 05:19 PM Feb 2015

Russian expansionism may pose existential threat, says Nato general

Source: The Guardian

Russian expansionism may pose existential threat, says Nato general

Peter Walker
Friday 20 February 2015 19.05 GMT

Russian expansionist ambitions could quickly become “an obvious existential threat to our whole being”, the most senior British military officer in Nato has said in a strongly worded speech.

General Sir Adrian Bradshaw, appointed last year as Nato’s deputy commander of forces in Europe, said the alliance needed to develop both fast-reacting conventional forces and capacities to counter Russian efforts at coercion and propaganda, as seen in Ukraine.

Talking of “an era of constant competition with Russia”, Bradshaw told an audience at the Royal United Services Institute that Nato had to maintain a cohesive system of deterrence on its eastern borders, something that would require help from the EU.

He said Nato was pushing ahead with plans for a very high readiness joint taskforce, “in order to convince Russia, or any other state adversary, that any attack on one Nato member will inevitably lead them into a conflict with the whole alliance”.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/20/russia-existential-threat-british-nato-general
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Russian expansionism may pose existential threat, says Nato general (Original Post) Eugene Feb 2015 OP
Why does NATO still exist? Man from Pickens Feb 2015 #1
Alliances don't require enemies. jeff47 Feb 2015 #3
Horseshit. bemildred Feb 2015 #2
Can't disagree with that. AverageJoe90 Feb 2015 #4
True, Putin is a very puny character in the long view uhnope Feb 2015 #5
Would you go annoy someone else please? bemildred Feb 2015 #6
 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
1. Why does NATO still exist?
Fri Feb 20, 2015, 05:39 PM
Feb 2015

Cold war ended 23 years ago. What exactly was the point of expanding an alliance that was created to defend against an enemy that had already capitulated and collapsed?

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
3. Alliances don't require enemies.
Fri Feb 20, 2015, 06:40 PM
Feb 2015

Keeping NATO going for us is keeping close relations with the other member countries.

Keeping NATO going for them is saving an enormous amount of money on defense spending.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
2. Horseshit.
Fri Feb 20, 2015, 06:16 PM
Feb 2015

If we cannot conquer Iraq, or Afghanistan, Russia sure as hell cannot conquer Europe. What a dumb ass.

What kind of military persons says things like: "“an obvious existential threat to our whole being”.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
4. Can't disagree with that.
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 03:36 AM
Feb 2015

Russia's leadership may be dangerous, but Russia has no real projection power at this point, perhaps beyond it's initial sphere of influence.

 

uhnope

(6,419 posts)
5. True, Putin is a very puny character in the long view
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 07:11 PM
Feb 2015

But having authoritarian anti-democracies spreading in Europe (Russia, Hungary, Belarus, now occupied Ukraine) is definitely a threat to basic human rights. And right now, Putin's Russia is the main player in spreading that kind of fascism in Europe. He's partnering up with fascists like Le Pen in France.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»Russian expansionism may ...