Cable News Far More Hawkish On Syria Than Public: Pew

[jakeXT]

A Pew study on Monday attracted attention for its assertion that Al Jazeera America, which promised a different take on the world than its cable news counterparts, mostly mirrored their approach when it came to the debate over Syria. But an equally interesting portion of the study found that all of the cable news channels were markedly more hawkish in their coverage than the public as a whole.

...

But Pew found that, "in the week studied, the overall percentage of cable stories conveying a message that America should get involved (47% ) solidly outnumbered stories with messages counseling against a strike (27%)."

The breakdowns are striking. For Al Jazeera, pro-strike messages outnumbered anti-strike ones by 43-24%. On CNN, it was 45-23. On Fox News, it was 45-20.

MSNBC, Pew found, had by far the most pro-strike sentiment, with a whopping 64%. But the network also had far more messages of opposition (39%) than its counterparts.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/17/cable-news-syria-pew_n_3940141.html?utm_hp_ref=media

[Journeyman]

1. Well, yeah. Only one group has profit in the offing . . .

[delrem]

2. Al Jazeera is the Emir of Qatar's blog.

The Emir of Qatar and family have a shitload of power.
Nothing compared to the House of Saud, of course, but plenty $$$.\

These guys are US "clients". None could exist without US military backing.
At that, it's a small price for the USA, to own these parasites.