Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumRep. Carolyn McCarthy says more must be done to keep guns out of the hands of convicted criminals
But we must do more to keep guns out of the hands of convicted criminals and other dangerous people. Federal lawmakers need to take action, too.
That means improving the National Instant Criminal Background Check system so those trying to buy through traditional, legal channels are stopped in their tracks. Right now, Congress doesnt fund the program well enough for it to be effective.
It also means closing the gun-show loophole by requiring a background check for every gun sale in the United States. Such checks would choke the supply chain for illegal gun dealers, who go down to states where background checks arent required.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/mccarthy-guns-people-problem-article-1.1190804#ixzz2ADt1c0HW
aikoaiko
(34,183 posts)Remmah2
(3,291 posts)nt
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)former-republican
(2,163 posts)But it still wouldn't stop criminals from buying firearms.
Stopping illegal gun sales is like trying to stop illegal drug sales.
Why it's only available to FFL's never made any sense to me.
It's the same thing is when a person wants to buy a gun from a private party.
If you suspect it could be stolen and you call the police they refuse to run a serial number check.
Db Owen97
(40 posts)Isn't that the same person that said a barrel shroud is and I quote "The shoulder-thing that goes up?"
sarisataka
(18,773 posts)I found this also:
emphasis added
Must be a mistake... aren't we told this never happens... gun everywhere for everyone...
SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)Db Owen97
(40 posts)It's kind of tricky to figure out this spot (I'm use to the standard structure of a forum)
Feel free to ask me and I'll answer to the best of my ability.
SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)See Post #48
http://www.democraticunderground.com/117280545
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)" Do you support the Brady Campaign and /or the Violence Prevention center?"
And if so then how?
virginia mountainman
(5,046 posts)No one individual cares enough to give more than $200.... NO ONE......
Select a Cycle:
Individual donors gave 0 large ($200+) contributions to this PAC in 2011-2012.
http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/pacgave2.php?cycle=2012&cmte=C00113449
Heck Brady has a little more cash on hand than I personally spent on my almost 16 year old daughter's 10 year old used car for her. LOL it was no BMW, but a mere Pontiac...
O well, when you support very unpopular legislation, no suprise you have a hard time finding funding.
But hey!! They gave $500 dollars in political contributions, to "A" democrat...
SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)http://www.issues2000.org/celeb/Democratic_Party_Gun_Control.htm
Trunk Monkey
(950 posts)ileus
(15,396 posts)Now that's fumby...
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)of course there are those heat seeking bullets
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=BRQqieimwLQ
Db Owen97
(40 posts)And lets not forget those puppy,baby,and kitten killing .223 bullets that destroy a police station whenever they are fired (even if they are fired in another country,I think they leave anti-semitic messages in their wake as well) *Sarcasm : Off*
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)and be tattooed so they can never have a job which would allow them to buy guns or prosthetic replacements.
There.
Problem solved.
Sure it violates some rights. But you don't want children to be killed do you? It's really about them.
trouble.smith
(374 posts)and then not releasing them back onto the streets if they are still a threat to the police and your constituents? as opposed to, say, harassing hard working, law abiding, tax paying citizens who are also part of your constituencies.
SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)That's a very extreme position, even the NRA supports background checks.
trouble.smith
(374 posts)furthermore, I don't think closing the so called "gun show loophole" will keep guns out of the hands of criminals and I think it's just the beginning of more draconian restrictions on second amendment rights which, you'll recall, shall not be infringed upon. we all know that ending private firearm sales is just the tip of the spear point aimed at the second amendment. What's more, as usual, this seemingly good intentioned legislative idea is rooted in the false premise that guns are the problem. Guns are not the problem, criminals are the problems so go after the criminals and quit worrying about guns in the hands of law abiding citizens.
SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)glacierbay
(2,477 posts)unfortunately, private sellers can't access the NICS system right now, I would like to see the NICS opened up for private sellers with a simple yes or no on sale.
No registration, no records kept, nothing, just yes or no.
rl6214
(8,142 posts)"Rep. Carolyn McCarthy is a Nassau County Democrat. She was elected to Congress in 1996, three years after her husband, Dennis, was murdered in a gun rampage on a Long Island Rail Road train."
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/mccarthy-guns-people-problem-article-1.1190804#ixzz2AJTt9SoR