Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 01:26 PM Sep 2012

Gunshot locators for Seattle

West Seattle resident and block watch captain Dick Hurley has been keeping his eyes and ears on his Sunrise Heights neighborhood and beyond for decades now, and every chance he gets (including a recent town hall meeting), he asks Seattle’s leadership if they will consider funding gunshot locator technology.

It appears his request has a chance at fruition as Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn recently announced his intent to fund gunshot locator technology (he also hopes to fund 10 additional police officers, upgraded in-car video equipment and improved crime analysis capabilities) in the 2013-14 budget.

Called ShotSpotter, the automatic gunshot locator system is expected to cost $950,000 over two years for installation and operation, according to a press release from the Mayor’s office.

“The City will install up to 52 mobile gunshot locator units near (shooting) hot spots, with each having a minimum 600-foot radius range and each having the ability to stream video,” according to the Mayor’s office. “They can be moved in response to special events or changing crime patterns. These units can determine if a gunshot has occurred within 4/10th’s of a second, pinpoint the location to within a 50-foot radius and determine the caliber of weapon that was fired with a 90 percent accuracy rate.”

http://www.westseattleherald.com/2012/09/19/news/longtime-west-seattle-block-watch-captain%E2%80%99s-reque
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gunshot locators for Seattle (Original Post) SecularMotion Sep 2012 OP
I bet someone could have fun with that formercia Sep 2012 #1
The gunnuts bongbong Sep 2012 #2
Seems an anti2A hoplophobic is more likely to shoot their mouth off than a gun nut shooting. Remmah2 Sep 2012 #5
Big words bongbong Sep 2012 #7
Delicate Flowers? Remmah2 Sep 2012 #9
Virgins? bongbong Sep 2012 #10
Do you seriously view all pro-RKBA people that way? MercutioATC Sep 2012 #18
Ad hominananana bongbong Sep 2012 #21
Seriously? MercutioATC Sep 2012 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author krispos42 Sep 2012 #23
He/she's a child and can't help her/his self rl6214 Sep 2012 #25
I thought I caught a whiff of urine. Nt Eleanors38 Sep 2012 #28
Could be 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #12
Predicts bongbong Sep 2012 #16
Poor bongbong. aikoaiko Sep 2012 #30
Can't wait until the local symphony plays the 1812 Overture. nt Remmah2 Sep 2012 #3
Restrict the right ... holdencaufield Sep 2012 #4
Sounds like a good idea. GreenStormCloud Sep 2012 #6
More money wasted. Clames Sep 2012 #8
This system has been discussed here a couple of times, as it's used in petronius Sep 2012 #11
Yeah but it wasnt' discussed by circularmotion... rl6214 Sep 2012 #26
As a CCW holder and a daily carrier, I see nothing wrong with this trouble.smith Sep 2012 #13
I have no problem with this technology, in fact I think it's great. Atypical Liberal Sep 2012 #14
22 blank gun renders 950k useless. ileus Sep 2012 #15
Or a .45 Auto and a pillow. That wouldn't register. Subsonic & Crazy quiet. nt rDigital Sep 2012 #17
There are legislators that would want to declare starting pistols and then ban them ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #19
I would like to see the business side of it ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #20
Unfortunately, those are the type of questions ManiacJoe Sep 2012 #24
This is new? tech3149 Sep 2012 #27
This technology has been in place Jenoch Sep 2012 #29

formercia

(18,479 posts)
1. I bet someone could have fun with that
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 01:29 PM
Sep 2012

There is no system that cannot be defeated or rendered useless by clever opponents.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
2. The gunnuts
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 02:02 PM
Sep 2012

Delicate Flowers (AKA Gun Nuts) will be shooting at these. They're afraid of everything, and this would be more "evidence" that the "evil gubmint" is tracking them. Paranoid Loons.

 

Remmah2

(3,291 posts)
5. Seems an anti2A hoplophobic is more likely to shoot their mouth off than a gun nut shooting.
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 02:08 PM
Sep 2012

They usually miss the target too. Shooting squibs.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
7. Big words
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 02:57 PM
Sep 2012

Using that online thesaurus sure makes you sound edumacated, doesn't it?



I'll state it in easier-to-digest verbiage: Delicate Flowers are so scared, they need guns to venture anywhere outside their houses and/or Fortress Of Solitudes.


 

MercutioATC

(28,470 posts)
18. Do you seriously view all pro-RKBA people that way?
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 08:10 PM
Sep 2012

I may disagree with some people on what is appropriate gun control, but most of the time they're intelligent people who simply have a different opinion.

...most of the time...

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
21. Ad hominananana
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 09:33 PM
Sep 2012

> ..most of the time...

Should I alert on your post and the implied insult within?

Nahhh, I'm not a Delicate Flower.

 

MercutioATC

(28,470 posts)
22. Seriously?
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 09:48 PM
Sep 2012

You refuse to answer the question and then speculate on alerting a post that would NEVER be hidden?

If you care to answer, I'm still interested.

Response to MercutioATC (Reply #18)

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
12. Could be
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 05:10 PM
Sep 2012

then again the gun-grabbers have a perfect track record of making false predictions (blood will run in the streets!).

So the safe money is on the opposite of what you describe happening.

But who knows, reality may decide to change it's long-held position and instead side with the antis.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
16. Predicts
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 06:21 PM
Sep 2012

> making false predictions (blood will run in the streets!)

Which one of the various massacres done this year by the Delicate Flowers are you talking about?

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
6. Sounds like a good idea.
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 02:29 PM
Sep 2012

If a CCWer had to shoot and was inside the zone for these then it would record the exact time, number of shots, and possibly even the different weapons used. That could really help, or hurt, someone's story. And it would definately be a help in catching criminals who use guns, and getting help to injured victims.

If this works well in places that have it, then it could quickly spread to all major cities.

petronius

(26,603 posts)
11. This system has been discussed here a couple of times, as it's used in
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 05:07 PM
Sep 2012

various cities - this is the first mention I've seen of video to go along with the microphones, however.

I don't have any objection to the purely gunshot-oriented capability of the system, but I do have a (perhaps knee-jerk) negative reaction to the camera and microphone aspect. There's just something creepy and prone to abuse in this creeping advance of the surveillance state.

I'm also a little put-off by the cost: $950,000 for two years, and what then? Wasn't it Los Angeles that recently admitted that parts of their camera system (paid for by private sources, even) was sitting there unused?

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
26. Yeah but it wasnt' discussed by circularmotion...
Sat Sep 22, 2012, 02:47 AM
Sep 2012

"This system has been discussed here a couple of times"

And it still hasn't been

 

trouble.smith

(374 posts)
13. As a CCW holder and a daily carrier, I see nothing wrong with this
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 05:10 PM
Sep 2012

Criminals will be less inclined to shoot at law abiders but law abiding CCW holders will have nothing to fear as they are legally authorized to shoot in self defense.

 

Atypical Liberal

(5,412 posts)
14. I have no problem with this technology, in fact I think it's great.
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 05:18 PM
Sep 2012

The system, as I understand it, is very intelligent and can distinguish between gunfire and other bang noises like car backfires, fireworks, etc.

This kind of system can be set up in high crime areas and can direct police and medical response to real gunshots being fired where they are not supposed to be within seconds.

I don't see why anyone would have a problem with these kinds of tools. They zero in on gunfire. Good or bad gunfire, the police ought to be involved, as fast as possible, because if someone is shooting, something bad is happening.

Note I'm not talking about shooting ranges or hunting preserves where these tools would obviously not be used.

I think this is a fantastic use of technology and the #1 target this will bear against are gangbangers with guns. I'm all for it.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
15. 22 blank gun renders 950k useless.
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 05:21 PM
Sep 2012

The kids will have fun with this new technology.

I don't see a problem beyond the waste of tax payer money...do people not call 911 in Seattle?

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
20. I would like to see the business side of it
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 08:59 PM
Sep 2012

As others here have pointed out the there is nothing intrinsic for the gun owner to fear about this except the economics.
- Will the city own the system
- Will it be fully functional
- Is there sufficient out year budget allocation to maintain and use it at a minimum
- Warranty
- Maintenance
- Software upgrades

Its overall effectiveness remains somewhat questionable

tech3149

(4,452 posts)
27. This is new?
Sat Sep 22, 2012, 03:22 AM
Sep 2012

Back in the late 70's early 80's I had to go to Columbia, SC for training. The facility provided beer with dinner so we all would be prepped to go out and have some fun. The facility was notfar from the capitol building and not far from a military base.
Somebody from GA brought some fireworks for entertainment. Within three minutes of the first blast there were three police cars with offices guns drawn. They weren't there quite as fast when we went skinny dipping in the hotel pool with an underwater window into the bar.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
29. This technology has been in place
Sat Sep 22, 2012, 05:36 PM
Sep 2012

in Minneapolis for several years. Basically, it allows the police to respond to specific locations where shots are heard. It increases the response time quite a bit. Theoretically, it is supposed to decrease the amount of 'gun violence' in the areas in which the shot spotters are located. I do not know how effective they have been for Minneapolis.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Gunshot locators for Seat...