Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumAnyone here a past or current member of the Brady Campaign?
http://www.bradycampaign.org/Or a past or current member of a local Million Mom March Chapter of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence?
http://www.bradycampaign.org/chapters/
rDigital
(2,239 posts)Equate
(256 posts)Didn't I read somewhere that the head of the million mom march was arrested for murder with a gun?
ToolMaker
(27 posts)President of the Springfield, Ill. Chapter of Million mom march. She was arrested for illegal possession of a firearm and possession of drugs.
There was another prominent fun control advocate that was arrested for murdering the young man that allegedly shot her son, if my memory is correct. I do not remember the exact circumstances now.
I wasn't quite sure.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)I tried to communicate my side of an issue. The Brady members were polite and seemed to listen, but I got the impression they didn't care about what I was trying to say.
They work against my interests. (As a collector with a significant investment in firearms, any proposal to ban, tax, or require recurring license fees for anything I own threatens my retirement savings.)
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)I thought they were advocating gun restrictions and now I find out they are really trying to fuck up your retirement savings.
You should cyber-stalk them and place bots in their CPUs to alert you when they approach your stash.
rl6214
(8,142 posts)Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)All they care about is getting more cars on the streets.
They don't care how many cars you buy, or if they are based on military styles, or even if they've been modified with extended gas tanks or spoilers.
Missycim
(950 posts)[IMG][/IMG]
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)rDigital
(2,239 posts)you walked right into that one. These people are feisty in the Gungeon. Everybody has to take their lumps.
I know I've had mine already.
rl6214
(8,142 posts)they contributed to the Bradys financially, at least he said he did but with his tall tails who knows.
shadowrider
(4,941 posts)rl6214
(8,142 posts)shadowrider
(4,941 posts)Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Are they on tree monkeys or giraffes?
rl6214
(8,142 posts)Isn't that special of you.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)rl6214
(8,142 posts)when you have to stoop to that level you have lost all credibility.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)petronius
(26,604 posts)So they do exist ... and I'm pretty proud to claim a sighting of such a rare and elusive creature!
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)I sent it back, blank (prepaid at Brady's expense).
Cost the Brady campaign money, and help the post office, its a win/win.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)this worked as well.
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2011/10/bank-junk-mail-brick
Kaleva
(36,354 posts)I'll try and remember to keep this kicked for awhile to see if there's anyone here who actively supports the foremost gun control organization in the US.
xxenderwigginxx
(146 posts)[link:|
rDigital
(2,239 posts)Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)"Your quote, though interesting, is taken way out of context. This is actually an excerpt from a leaflet Gandhi was passing around to gain recruits to fight for Britain during World War I. Organizers of a war conference, which Gandhi wanted to attend, quoted the leaflet as a way of illustrating that their political views differed from Gandhi's. In order to boot the British out of India, Gandhi engaged in many savvy, polemical activities designed to move India toward Home Rule. Distribution of this leaflet was apparently one of them. He certainly did not include the leaflet quote in his autobiography to support any opinion, one way or the other, on gun control. Reading the quote in context makes this crystal, sparkling clear. The passage in which the quote occurs has absolutely nothing to do with gun control or gun legislation.
Furthermore, to the best of my knowledge, at no point in Gandhi's 90-volume collected writings does he ever express a belief in an individual's right to keep and bear arms. It would certainly be weird if he did. If Gandhi will be remembered for anything, it will be for his passionate dedication to two principles. The first is ahimsa, a Hindu vow to never consciously injure another living creature. The second is satyagraha, the belief that non-violent methods are the only methods that should ever be used to resist injustice and tyranny. The leaflet quote simply doesn't reflect Gandhi's actual beliefs in any way."
http://msgboard.snopes.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=101;t=000195;p=0
GCP
(8,166 posts)I finally realized I was beating my head against a brick wall expecting anything ever to be achieved against the gun lobby.
And I donated.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)It's all top down and led by elites.
It's not an interest group with actual people in it.
Kaleva
(36,354 posts)GCP
(8,166 posts)They had plenty of support but the NRA beat them on funding and douche-baggery. People who supported the Brady lobby don't come on your board anyway, so why should you get any replies. I only happened to see the post on the main forum page.
Reasonable_Argument
(881 posts)NRA = 4.3 million members
VPC = 26,000 members
Somebody is losing this fight, and it isn't the NRA. You don't have a legislative problem, you have a cultural problem. Your ideas were rejected.
Kaleva
(36,354 posts)As the Gun Control & RKBA group is the designated place in DU for discussion about gun control and gun policy, I would think that those who think it to be a very important issue to them would be at least reading what is posted here.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=118x347851
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=408568&mesg_id=408589
http://www.democraticunderground.com/117236520