Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alabama_for_obama

(136 posts)
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 07:21 PM Jul 2012

so seriously, what do people think a gun registry is going to do to stop a crazy man?

The guy in Aurora was taken alive by the police. What would a registry do to have stopped this shooting from happening? I doubt this guy was under any serious illusion that he was going to get away with it. Has there ever been a gun crime solved or prevented because of a gun registry?

40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
so seriously, what do people think a gun registry is going to do to stop a crazy man? (Original Post) alabama_for_obama Jul 2012 OP
what you get from a registry is a source of information that you can compare to other information Fresh_Start Jul 2012 #1
Just buying that much ammunition and those weapons riverbendviewgal Jul 2012 #3
So you would want to register body armor, ammunition, gas masks, and what else? ProgressiveProfessor Jul 2012 #11
You can use the Patriot Act as the basis for such a tracking system hack89 Jul 2012 #36
Universal surveillance, removal of "innocent until proven guilty provisions", random searches 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #39
is it illegal alabama_for_obama Jul 2012 #2
They go through body armor? And gas canisters? geckosfeet Jul 2012 #5
Then they be rich.n/t safeinOhio Jul 2012 #7
Interesting definition of rich. GarroHorus Jul 2012 #17
May be 22s. safeinOhio Jul 2012 #25
Apparently alabama_for_obama Jul 2012 #37
When he bought 6000 rounds, ballistic gear and gas canisters some type of cross reference geckosfeet Jul 2012 #4
trafficking patterns? gejohnston Jul 2012 #9
Oh please. If a gun is bought from a dealer you know who it was sold to. geckosfeet Jul 2012 #31
we have that already gejohnston Jul 2012 #35
By the same token, buying fertilizer and 30 gallons of diesel fule..... wandy Jul 2012 #22
In a way, I'll bet that cross-referencing actually happened - in the petronius Jul 2012 #30
IT wouldn't do ANYTHING, but it would make them FEEL better taking away YOUR rights. nt GarroHorus Jul 2012 #6
Would letting people carry guns into that theatre have helped? HockeyMom Jul 2012 #10
I never claimed it would. GarroHorus Jul 2012 #12
the tear gas helped gejohnston Jul 2012 #19
I have a carry permit and had I been in the theater ... spin Jul 2012 #21
Goshes mam, that is one frightening thought........ wandy Jul 2012 #23
I went and saw the Dark Knight Rises thursday nite and I WAS carrying my concealed handgun rl6214 Jul 2012 #32
It'd put a big dent in straw sales. safeinOhio Jul 2012 #14
Enfocing the existing laws would put a big dent in straw sales GarroHorus Jul 2012 #18
there are already police lists of stolen guns, if people report them as stolen to the police. alabama_for_obama Jul 2012 #20
Most gun crimes are handgun crimes. safeinOhio Jul 2012 #24
Nothing but provide another bit of evidence Warpy Jul 2012 #8
you have obviously never handled a gun, much less reloaded one. alabama_for_obama Jul 2012 #13
Magazine size was not a serious issues. You can change a standard 30 rd magazine very quickly ProgressiveProfessor Jul 2012 #15
30? Try 10. Warpy Jul 2012 #27
I have read that his magic magazine jammed, not unlike Loughner ProgressiveProfessor Jul 2012 #28
High capacity drum magazines jam all the time GarroHorus Jul 2012 #29
For real. n/t alabama_for_obama Jul 2012 #38
Do you know how many shots Cho, the Virginia Tech shooter got off? rl6214 Jul 2012 #33
so if they do nothing alabama_for_obama Jul 2012 #16
What makes you think all cases are airtight? Warpy Jul 2012 #26
It didn't stop Michael Ryan, Marc Lépine, Valery Fabrikant... Euromutt Jul 2012 #34
He didn't use 6000 rounds 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #40

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
1. what you get from a registry is a source of information that you can compare to other information
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 07:23 PM
Jul 2012

for example you could find out which a-hole just bought 5000 rounds of ammunition and body armor.

It doesn't work by itself, but its a building block.

riverbendviewgal

(4,253 posts)
3. Just buying that much ammunition and those weapons
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 07:25 PM
Jul 2012

in the short time seems to me to be a red flag going up.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
11. So you would want to register body armor, ammunition, gas masks, and what else?
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 07:32 PM
Jul 2012

Go look at how much ammunition is sold in this country alone. Who would make those queries and track that data? Who has that kind of resources outside of Google? (who probably already does)

hack89

(39,171 posts)
36. You can use the Patriot Act as the basis for such a tracking system
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 12:03 PM
Jul 2012

I am certain that the government can be trusted.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
39. Universal surveillance, removal of "innocent until proven guilty provisions", random searches
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 02:46 PM
Jul 2012

of course no limits on when/where the police can search and spontaneous nighttime raids on peoples homes without a warrant would do wonders to cut down on criminal activities.

And then we could finally be free.

 

GarroHorus

(1,055 posts)
17. Interesting definition of rich.
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 07:36 PM
Jul 2012

You can get 5000 rounds pretty cheap in some sales for high volumes.

safeinOhio

(32,688 posts)
25. May be 22s.
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 08:10 PM
Jul 2012

260,000/year will not be cheap, even in high volumes for larger rounds.

What would be your best prices for 45s, 30.06 or even 223s for a 1/4 million rounds. I'd be willing to bet it is more than I make a year at my job.

alabama_for_obama

(136 posts)
37. Apparently
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 01:16 PM
Jul 2012

There is money to be made in competitive target shooting. And some people are rich. I've met dudes that go around buying 20 grand worth of ammo at a pop to feed their machine guns.

geckosfeet

(9,644 posts)
4. When he bought 6000 rounds, ballistic gear and gas canisters some type of cross reference
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 07:27 PM
Jul 2012

could have been to alert authorities.

Maybe?

Probably not. But why not at least make it possible?

Registries could also be useful in tracking gun ownership, and determining trafficking patterns. It's just a law enforcement tool. And we all want law enforcement to do their jobs. Don't we?

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
9. trafficking patterns?
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 07:29 PM
Jul 2012

please explain, you think traffickers will register the guns at each step on the route?

geckosfeet

(9,644 posts)
31. Oh please. If a gun is bought from a dealer you know who it was sold to.
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 12:01 AM
Jul 2012

Unless they used fake id etc. If the guns sourced from a particular dealer end up in a lot of crimes you have something to look at. The dealer and his customers.

You have to start somewhere. You have to make an honest effort. If you refuse to even try, or obstruct any effort then you are contributing to the problem.

wandy

(3,539 posts)
22. By the same token, buying fertilizer and 30 gallons of diesel fule.....
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 07:53 PM
Jul 2012

would also alert the authorities.
This might really tick off a farmer trying to plant the crops.

petronius

(26,602 posts)
30. In a way, I'll bet that cross-referencing actually happened - in the
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 11:21 PM
Jul 2012

bowels of some internet marketing computer system. I'm sure the google-ads served up to Holmes are quite relevant to his interests...

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
10. Would letting people carry guns into that theatre have helped?
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 07:32 PM
Jul 2012

Dozens of panicked people just shooting? More wanna be Clint Eastwoods? How about more dead people?

 

GarroHorus

(1,055 posts)
12. I never claimed it would.
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 07:34 PM
Jul 2012

Cinemark owns the theater and Cinemark bans all guns from its property, so there is no question about there being guns all over the place in the theater.

Their house, their rules.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
19. the tear gas helped
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 07:37 PM
Jul 2012

remember, he was throwing tear gas grenades before he opened fire. To answer your question, how many were simply panicked and how many were effects of the gas, or both?

spin

(17,493 posts)
21. I have a carry permit and had I been in the theater ...
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 07:49 PM
Jul 2012

I would have been very hesitant to engage the shooter unless he would have been at arm's distance. Since he was wearing body armor my .38 snub nosed revolver would have proved ineffective anyhow.

wandy

(3,539 posts)
23. Goshes mam, that is one frightening thought........
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 08:01 PM
Jul 2012

Take one whacked out shooter fireing off rounds in smoky darkness.
Now add 10 or 15 Zimmermans trying to play John Wayne.
All of them just pointing at the last muzzle flash in the smoky dark.
Darn it HockeyMom just the thought of how much larger the kill count would have been is the stuff nightmares are made from.

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
32. I went and saw the Dark Knight Rises thursday nite and I WAS carrying my concealed handgun
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 12:06 AM
Jul 2012

Nothing happened.

safeinOhio

(32,688 posts)
14. It'd put a big dent in straw sales.
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 07:35 PM
Jul 2012

Make it much harder to sell stolen handguns and more dangerous for those that do. It would shed more light of where illegal guns came from. It would make it easier to take away handguns from those convicted of violent crimes or committed to mental hospitals.

There is nothing unconstitutional about handgun registration. States have been doing it for years without court interference. Show us any federal court that said it violates the 2nd.

alabama_for_obama

(136 posts)
20. there are already police lists of stolen guns, if people report them as stolen to the police.
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 07:40 PM
Jul 2012

I imagine stolen guns are not going to be sold very regularly to law abiding citizens, so tell me again: how does a registry stop them from being sold to other criminals?

I'll give you credit for it being easier to take away guns (why just handguns??) from those convicted of violent crimes or people who had been committed for mental issues. That is one benefit that hasn't been discussed much. But you'd think people convicted of violent crimes should be removed from society in general, no?

safeinOhio

(32,688 posts)
24. Most gun crimes are handgun crimes.
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 08:06 PM
Jul 2012

You could easily buy a stolen gun in a private sale with out knowing it. You will never stop all illegal gun sales, the best we can do is make it more difficult for the criminal while making it as easy as it is currently to buy a legal handgun from a dealer.

People that are convicted of violent crimes serve their sentence and are then released. I'd also be in favor of treating violent criminals, that use a gun in a crime, being treated like sex offenders. Have to register when they move and the like.

Warpy

(111,270 posts)
8. Nothing but provide another bit of evidence
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 07:29 PM
Jul 2012

to lock his murderous ass far away from the rest of us.

Stiffer regulations on magazine sizes might have slowed him down and reduced the carnage, especially if some brave soul tackled him while he was reloading, something which has happened in other mass shootings.

Tracking large purchases of ammo + riot gear might have gotten him investigated, the agents noticing he'd gone completely off the rails and getting him some treatment while confiscating the arsenal.

We can never stop these people. We can slow them down.

alabama_for_obama

(136 posts)
13. you have obviously never handled a gun, much less reloaded one.
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 07:34 PM
Jul 2012

takes about a second. maybe less. and you think that making a large capacity magazine is rocket science? they cost about $20 retail. they are small, easy to smuggle, and people want them. They are not going anywhere. and besides, where do you draw the line? 1 shot? 2, 5, 10, 30? what is reasonable? I don't see the point in the magazine bans.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
15. Magazine size was not a serious issues. You can change a standard 30 rd magazine very quickly
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 07:35 PM
Jul 2012

I have read he also had a shotgun and 2 pistols. Read elsewhere that he started with the shotgun.

I will be interested to see if tackling him was possible. Not enough out yet on the physicality of the situation. Same goes for the sequence of events.

Warpy

(111,270 posts)
27. 30? Try 10.
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 08:20 PM
Jul 2012

That's a lot of stopping and starting and rummaging for ammo or the other guns.

Remember, slowing them down is the aim. Slowing them down can provide an opportunity to stop them.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
28. I have read that his magic magazine jammed, not unlike Loughner
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 11:16 PM
Jul 2012

Don't know if that is true yet, lots of stuff being posted, some of it contradictory. No real pro would use one.

 

GarroHorus

(1,055 posts)
29. High capacity drum magazines jam all the time
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 11:19 PM
Jul 2012

If I'm ever in a situation like that, I HOPE the bastard is using a drum magazine because the chances of it jamming are much higher than with a low capacity mag.

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
33. Do you know how many shots Cho, the Virginia Tech shooter got off?
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 12:11 AM
Jul 2012

170 shots using only ten round magazines. He changed mags 17 times while killing 32 and injuring 17. A 10 round mag didn't slow him down.

alabama_for_obama

(136 posts)
16. so if they do nothing
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 07:36 PM
Jul 2012

but provide a bit of evidence in an already airtight case... can you tell me a single incident where a gun registry solved a gun crime or was significant/important in prosecuting a real crime?

Euromutt

(6,506 posts)
34. It didn't stop Michael Ryan, Marc Lépine, Valery Fabrikant...
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 02:51 AM
Jul 2012

...Thomas Hamilton, Robert Steinhäuser, Huan Yun Xiang, Kimveer Gill, Bastian Bosse, Derrick Bird, Tristan van der Vlis... I could go on.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
40. He didn't use 6000 rounds
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 02:48 PM
Jul 2012

limiting him to a few hundred (a trivial amount for a day of target shooting) would have accomplished precisely nothing.

Not allowing him to buy body armor would have accomplished nothing.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»so seriously, what do peo...