Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 01:22 AM Jul 2012

Update from Birmingham, MI


Bloomfield Hills— A recent Troy High School graduate was acquitted Thursday of all charges in his arrest for carrying a rifle through downtown Birmingham.

A jury in 48th District Court found Sean M. Combs, 18, not guilty of brandishing a firearm and disturbing the peace. Wednesday, Judge Marc Barron issued a directed verdict dismissing a charge of resisting and obstructing a police officer after Combs' attorney, James Makowski, argued that city attorney Mary Kucharek had not proven that offense.

"I think they came up with the right verdict," Combs said after his acquittal. "It took them a while, but at the end of the day, I think it was the right decision."

From The Detroit News: http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20120712/METRO02/207120447#ixzz20TdJdcrx

I doesn't sound like the DA had much of a case.
110 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Update from Birmingham, MI (Original Post) gejohnston Jul 2012 OP
Correct verdict sarisataka Jul 2012 #1
He should have Meiko Jul 2012 #2
If he had shown his ID, he probably would not have been arrested. ManiacJoe Jul 2012 #3
In other words Meiko Jul 2012 #4
There was probable cause, if you believe the cops. ManiacJoe Jul 2012 #8
So, if someone doesn't appear to be a citizen.... PavePusher Jul 2012 #10
Yes, you are right, when ManiacJoe Jul 2012 #13
I my most thick German accent: Spoonman Jul 2012 #7
Question sarisataka Jul 2012 #9
Since there is no requirement to carry a gov. issued ID.... PavePusher Jul 2012 #11
Makes sense sarisataka Jul 2012 #12
In MN, it is a requirement, Oneka Jul 2012 #14
Yep permatex Jul 2012 #15
I updated the original thread with this info, too. mvccd1000 Jul 2012 #5
Another victory for progressives and the 99%. ileus Jul 2012 #6
Who's that? bongbong Jul 2012 #84
Geat, every stupid teen - with gun loving dad - looking for attention will feel so inclined as well. Hoyt Jul 2012 #16
Sure they will permatex Jul 2012 #17
Here's hoping -- and betting -- next right wing gun carrying goof doing same will be stopped. Hoyt Jul 2012 #18
You can tell political affiliation from those pictures? Really? PavePusher Jul 2012 #19
I don't know for sure, but I think there is a big overlap in bigotry and needing to display and/or Hoyt Jul 2012 #22
Ironically, if there were... beevul Jul 2012 #27
I proudly admit I'm bigoted against most who carry and promote guns. Hoyt Jul 2012 #29
You condemn others as bigots by making assumptions about them based on their appearance. 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #67
When group has "assault" weapons hanging, miltia shirts, march with nothing but white crazies, Hoyt Jul 2012 #69
You can tell they're crazy by looking at them? 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #71
Looks pretty obvious to me. They look like every gun toting bigoted right winger I grew up with. Hoyt Jul 2012 #75
Bigotry makes a lot of things obvious 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #77
So whats your point? permatex Jul 2012 #20
they all look too young to be teabaggers gejohnston Jul 2012 #21
You need to listen to some Young Republicans. Hoyt Jul 2012 #23
You just know everything about everything don't you? permatex Jul 2012 #24
There's legal; then there's moral, ethical, right, etc. Hoyt Jul 2012 #25
So tell me again why we should care what YOU think permatex Jul 2012 #26
The end justifies the means sarisataka Jul 2012 #28
The only thing I can tell by those pictures Spoonman Jul 2012 #30
Now, I agree with that. However, the militia tshirts, monochrome color, imbred look, and "assault" Hoyt Jul 2012 #31
What's an "imbred look" look like? CokeMachine Jul 2012 #33
You got problems, Spoonman Jul 2012 #34
No you have problems if you won't admit what's in those photos. Hoyt Jul 2012 #35
What's the difference between your "photo" assertions Spoonman Jul 2012 #36
I have admitted my bigotry toward gun nuts like this. I hope to remain that way till death. Hoyt Jul 2012 #39
I get it, bigotry is OK, so long as YOU feel it's JUSTIFIED bigotry Spoonman Jul 2012 #41
You're not bigoted against say Nazis, or KKK members? Hoyt Jul 2012 #43
Knock it off Hoyt permatex Jul 2012 #44
I would not say I am bigoted sarisataka Jul 2012 #45
Call it whatever you want. I'm bigoted against those groups because they're immoral. Hoyt Jul 2012 #46
Do you believe that... sarisataka Jul 2012 #47
Why of course he does permatex Jul 2012 #96
So true sarisataka Jul 2012 #103
"militia tshirts"? Where? I see a few t-shirts, none with visible slogans. PavePusher Jul 2012 #37
First you need to turn in your guns, you can't see. "PROOF: First photo, guy on left -- "Militia" Hoyt Jul 2012 #38
You are correct, I missed that. PavePusher Jul 2012 #40
I doubt it says anything like "Militias are wrong." I suspect it's just more proof of what I said. Hoyt Jul 2012 #48
There are a number of bands with the word "Militia" in their name. PavePusher Jul 2012 #49
You could be right - I think it says "ayran nation militia". Hoyt Jul 2012 #50
Michigan Militia petronius Jul 2012 #51
Truth is, Petronious, it doesn't matter whether it is Michigan Militia, Ayran Nation, KKK, whatever. Hoyt Jul 2012 #52
So point out to us what they are doing thats illegal. permatex Jul 2012 #53
Permatex, bigotry is not a civil right. You really need to do some thinking before posting that crap Hoyt Jul 2012 #54
Being a bigot is a civil right permatex Jul 2012 #55
I don't have to "accept" that right wing crap. Hoyt Jul 2012 #56
I never once said that you have to "accept" that right wing crap permatex Jul 2012 #57
Then you are rejecting reality. That's not at all a healthy thing to do. n/t. PavePusher Jul 2012 #62
That's the dumbest, most self-contradicting statement I've seen so far today.... PavePusher Jul 2012 #61
LOL permatex Jul 2012 #63
Hoyt wants them shot by government agents. In the face. PavePusher Jul 2012 #60
Ah yes Meiko Jul 2012 #66
Bike gangs never blew up a government building or shot minorities for fun. Hoyt Jul 2012 #70
Holy Fuck-Balls, you've managed to top yourself. PavePusher Jul 2012 #73
Timmie McVeigh was a paramilitary gun nut. The Arizona militias shoot immigrants for fun. Hoyt Jul 2012 #74
"The Arizona militias shoot immigrants for fun." PavePusher Jul 2012 #76
Is this guy made up, other than fact big bigot gun lover just died? Hoyt Jul 2012 #78
You claimed they were "shooting immigrants for fun." PavePusher Jul 2012 #80
Why else are they armed like perverts? Hoyt Jul 2012 #81
Cite your evidence or recant your lies. n/t PavePusher Jul 2012 #82
C'mon permatex Jul 2012 #97
There is no evidence that Meiko Jul 2012 #92
If you are Meiko Jul 2012 #90
C'mon, DU gun-religionists bongbong Jul 2012 #83
LMAO. Hoyt Jul 2012 #86
I'll never tell Meiko Jul 2012 #93
Post removed Post removed Jul 2012 #64
Not that racist crap again. At least those guys had reasons to be armed at the time. You should be Hoyt Jul 2012 #72
You can't even define the word "shame". Clames Jul 2012 #89
I can't believe you used the word shame. permatex Jul 2012 #98
Maybe, you should learn from jury. Hoyt Jul 2012 #101
Whatever are you talking about? permatex Jul 2012 #102
What do you suggest, shoot them? Tejas Jul 2012 #65
Yes sarisataka Jul 2012 #68
Yep CokeMachine Jul 2012 #32
Republican agenda - you promote it Tejas Jul 2012 #58
I like the blond in front bongbong Jul 2012 #79
Her finger is indexed along the receiver sarisataka Jul 2012 #85
Gun tech bongbong Jul 2012 #88
Helps to know what you are talking about sarisataka Jul 2012 #91
He could know what he's talking about and he'd still look like a fool. permatex Jul 2012 #99
It is exactly why sarisataka Jul 2012 #104
Rich bongbong Jul 2012 #108
I don't believe I ever stated my religious preference sarisataka Jul 2012 #110
Actually Meiko Jul 2012 #105
Hard to tell but, sarisataka Jul 2012 #106
Guns in the streets Meiko Jul 2012 #42
Sarah Brady probably came close to a heart attack. Tejas Jul 2012 #59
Laughing at a possible heart attack? bongbong Jul 2012 #87
I am pretty sure Meiko Jul 2012 #94
Gun's cause heart-attacks! 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #95
Defense bongbong Jul 2012 #109
I laugh at a RW POS but you have a problem with that. Tejas Jul 2012 #100
Just for you permatex Jul 2012 #107

sarisataka

(18,663 posts)
1. Correct verdict
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 01:27 AM
Jul 2012

but still a stupid action. Looking for confrontation does not win many people over to your side.

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
3. If he had shown his ID, he probably would not have been arrested.
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 02:51 AM
Jul 2012

He was engaged in a public act that required him to be 18+, and he did not look the part.

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
4. In other words
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 03:22 AM
Jul 2012

he was profiled. He was not breaking any laws and was minding his own business. There was no probable cause.

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
8. There was probable cause, if you believe the cops.
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 11:29 AM
Jul 2012

They thought he was under age. Show and ID to prove you are an adult, then good to go.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
10. So, if someone doesn't appear to be a citizen....
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 01:02 PM
Jul 2012

we can check to ascertain that they are here legally, amiright?

 

Spoonman

(1,761 posts)
7. I my most thick German accent:
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 11:12 AM
Jul 2012

Show us your papers!

Let's analyze your train of thought.

You need to show your ID to engage in a public act.......... but not to vote?

sarisataka

(18,663 posts)
9. Question
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 12:58 PM
Jul 2012

if a young looking person is walking down the street with a 6-pack of PBR, can the police ask for ID?

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
11. Since there is no requirement to carry a gov. issued ID....
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 01:04 PM
Jul 2012

in any state, they can not demand that you produce one. They can require that you identify yourself verbally, and they can then check that, as I understand it.

Oneka

(653 posts)
14. In MN, it is a requirement,
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 03:31 PM
Jul 2012

Only if you are currently carrying. The state added this provision into their pistol carry law. It is the only place in any MN statute that specifically requires that you carry identification. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=624.714

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
15. Yep
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 04:35 PM
Jul 2012

and that stems from a rancher in No. NV. who refused to identify himself on his own property. Went all the way to the SCOTUS.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
6. Another victory for progressives and the 99%.
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 06:56 AM
Jul 2012

In the face of the police state this young man stood his ground for what's right.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
84. Who's that?
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 07:04 PM
Jul 2012

The "progressive" arm of the teabaggers?



(and don't give me that PROVE IT crap. Anybody who thinks these aren't a bunch of repig teabagging sheep is too clueless to live)

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
16. Geat, every stupid teen - with gun loving dad - looking for attention will feel so inclined as well.
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 07:28 PM
Jul 2012
 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
17. Sure they will
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 07:43 PM
Jul 2012

He was legal, the jury agreed with him and pretty much slapped the cops down. Maybe the cops should learn the law their sworn to up hold. Or are you still doing this:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=118&topic_id=471849#471995

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
18. Here's hoping -- and betting -- next right wing gun carrying goof doing same will be stopped.
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 09:52 PM
Jul 2012

Police will not allow stupid, selfish, poorly raised teens to walk down the street with a rifle.

Look at the photos of that kid and the folks who congratulate him -- big group of Tbaggers.










Fine looking group of right wing gun Tbaggers.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
19. You can tell political affiliation from those pictures? Really?
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 09:57 PM
Jul 2012

I think you're making shit up... again.

Why is this tolerated here in "Gun Control & RKBA (Group)" but not elsewhere on D.U.?

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
22. I don't know for sure, but I think there is a big overlap in bigotry and needing to display and/or
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 10:23 PM
Jul 2012

abuse guns. I'm not saying everyone, but the majority of gun owners are right wingers, as are the big lobbying groups backing primarily right wing legislators and causes.

It's not difficult when taken in context - context is important - to guess the Tbag types. It would be good even if I only tested at 70% correct identification, and I can do better than that.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
27. Ironically, if there were...
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 11:40 PM
Jul 2012

Ironically, if there really were a "big overlap in bigotry" - meaning the expression of bigoted statements...


You would be pictured in one of those photos.


Yeah, you.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
67. You condemn others as bigots by making assumptions about them based on their appearance.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 03:27 PM
Jul 2012

Awesome.

You are just a treasure-trove of crazy.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
69. When group has "assault" weapons hanging, miltia shirts, march with nothing but white crazies,
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 05:18 PM
Jul 2012

look marginally educated, march because police stopped you for strutting down public streets with a rifle, etc., it's not hard to identify the group as a bunch Tbaggers. You'll be right 95% of time. The other 5%, the yahoos will be worse then Tbaggers.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
71. You can tell they're crazy by looking at them?
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 05:21 PM
Jul 2012

My god think of how many lives you could save with this magical skill.

Why are you wasting your talents here when you should be hanging out in public places informing the police on which citizens are secretly violent nutjobs.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
77. Bigotry makes a lot of things obvious
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 06:46 PM
Jul 2012

Who are criminals: those people, obviously.

Who are decent virtuous folks: me and people like me, obviously.

Who are lazy degenerate . . .

/obvious but not accurate. Although granted it is a much simpler life.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
20. So whats your point?
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 09:59 PM
Jul 2012

What are they doing thats illegal?
Your advocating the violation of civil rights is so typical you, shouldn't you be somewhere else?

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
23. You need to listen to some Young Republicans.
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 10:33 PM
Jul 2012

And, plenty of young folks follow their role models -- dad, friends (whose dads and coaches influence them), TV shows (where stars either use guns, get shot by guns, attempt to medically attend to gun shot victims, arrest or prosecute shooters, defend shooters, and a bunch of other crazy stuff), etc.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
24. You just know everything about everything don't you?
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 10:56 PM
Jul 2012

There is nothing wrong or illegal with those people in those pics. If there was, the law would have come down on them.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
26. So tell me again why we should care what YOU think
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 11:13 PM
Jul 2012

is moral, ethical, right?
Do you think it's moral, ethical, right to post lies about other DU'ers? Do you think it's moral, ethical, right to misrepresent what other DU'ers say?
Yeah, your a real good one to judge what's moral, ethical, and right.

 

Spoonman

(1,761 posts)
30. The only thing I can tell by those pictures
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:46 PM
Jul 2012

about any of their "upbringing", is the blond in the last photo was raised on a healthy diet of corn!

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
31. Now, I agree with that. However, the militia tshirts, monochrome color, imbred look, and "assault"
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:07 PM
Jul 2012

weapons are a dead give-away to anyone who wants to be the least bit objective. These are Tbag gun nuts, and very likely bigots.

 

Spoonman

(1,761 posts)
34. You got problems,
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 01:54 PM
Jul 2012

if you can't tell the difference between a "tbag" and what's in that picture!

 

Spoonman

(1,761 posts)
36. What's the difference between your "photo" assertions
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 02:34 PM
Jul 2012

and someone else asserting that a photo of a group of blacks standing in line is "a group of blacks waiting on food stamps"?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigotry

Bigotry is the state of mind of a "bigot", a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially one who exhibits intolerance or animosity toward members of a group. Bigotry may be based on real or perceived characteristics,..........


"militia tshirts, monochrome color, imbred look"


Seems to me you harbor a great deal of bigotry yourself.

Without a link or any other information, as far as I know those people could be "Democrats for open carry", or a "Pink Pistols" rally.

You want me to become just a biggoted.
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
39. I have admitted my bigotry toward gun nuts like this. I hope to remain that way till death.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 05:21 PM
Jul 2012

I'll bet everyone of those gun nuts in the photos accept/believe your little story about "food stamps." I bet most of them are Limbaugh, Boortz, etc., devotees too.

 

Spoonman

(1,761 posts)
41. I get it, bigotry is OK, so long as YOU feel it's JUSTIFIED bigotry
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 06:10 PM
Jul 2012

good luck with that, I was raised a little different.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
43. You're not bigoted against say Nazis, or KKK members?
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 06:28 PM
Jul 2012

You can call it what you want, but "bigotry" is OK when pointed in the correct direction. It's not so good as practiced by right wing Tbaggers.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
44. Knock it off Hoyt
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 06:33 PM
Jul 2012

Where did he say he wasn't? Just because it isn't said doesn't mean we support them. Here's what I support, I support the constutition and the BoR for all people whether I agree with their politics, views or not.
It is painfully obvious you do not.

sarisataka

(18,663 posts)
45. I would not say I am bigoted
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 06:44 PM
Jul 2012

against either group. I consider them ill-informed racist dumb-asses who embarrass themselves every time they open their mouths.

But I will also acknowledge and support their right to open their mouths and embarrass themselves.

I do not believe they should be persecuted more than any other group, until they break the law. If they do break the law I believe they should receive due process and if convicted, their views may be considered in passing sentence.

I believe all bigotry is bad because I also believe the end does not justify the means.

sarisataka

(18,663 posts)
103. So true
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 10:56 PM
Jul 2012

I noticed the non-answer. Always ready to leap to the defense of a violent criminal however...

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
37. "militia tshirts"? Where? I see a few t-shirts, none with visible slogans.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 05:14 PM
Jul 2012

"monochrome color"? Oxymoron, much? Oh wait, it's you... sigh. I see at least 6 colors of shirts, and 5 or 7 colors of pants, to say nothing of shoes.... And why is their choice of fashion of any relevence?

"imbred look"? Stereotyping bigotry, much? And again... it's you. What defines this "imbred look" anyway?

"'assault' weapons"? I see nothing that indicates the presence of full-auto military/police/government agent sidearms.

We eagerly anticipate your citations to evidence for any of the above.

Really.



 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
38. First you need to turn in your guns, you can't see. "PROOF: First photo, guy on left -- "Militia"
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 05:18 PM
Jul 2012

Those are clearly Tbaggin gun nuts -- you just don't want to admit it.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
40. You are correct, I missed that.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 06:02 PM
Jul 2012

It also has some other writing on it, can't tell what it says, so not possible to be sure of context. Unless you have other information?

As far as the rest of your statement.... you are attempting to extrapolate from zero, which anyone with a sound grounding in mathematics can tell you is, at best, a fool's errand.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
48. I doubt it says anything like "Militias are wrong." I suspect it's just more proof of what I said.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:20 PM
Jul 2012

In this case, I have not extrapolated from zero. We both know what these folks are up to, and guns are central to their beliefs.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
49. There are a number of bands with the word "Militia" in their name.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:25 AM
Jul 2012

Again, feel free to extrapolate without data.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
50. You could be right - I think it says "ayran nation militia".
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:31 AM
Jul 2012

That would fit in with the other right wingers in photo.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
52. Truth is, Petronious, it doesn't matter whether it is Michigan Militia, Ayran Nation, KKK, whatever.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 08:27 AM
Jul 2012

They are all a bunch of right wing bigots.

And most importantly it PROVES what I said -- the yahoos backing this poor, pitiful gun exhibitionist are just a bunch of Tbaggers.






Isn't it considered poor taste to link to right wing websites?

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
53. So point out to us what they are doing thats illegal.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 09:57 AM
Jul 2012

They may be a RW militia, so what, are you saying that they should be taken down by LE and banned? If so, why?
I hate what RWingers stand for and believe in, doesn't mean I want to violated their civil rights. Until they break the law, they have every right to peacefully assemble, carry firearms, spout their racist shit.

It's called their CIVIL RIGHTS Hoyt, now we all know that if you had your way, you would shut down any group you don't agree with, but guess what? You don't get to do that.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
54. Permatex, bigotry is not a civil right. You really need to do some thinking before posting that crap
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 10:07 AM
Jul 2012

here. What they are doing is immoral, and just flat wrong -- it might be Constitutional, but it's wrong. And, so are you.

You need to understand that legal is not always right.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
55. Being a bigot is a civil right
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 10:16 AM
Jul 2012

It's called the 1st Amendment.
You should heed your own advice.
It doesn't matter what I think, it's what the law of the land is.
It is immoral and wrong, thats where we agree, but it is their right and I will defend their right to believe what they believe in. Thats where you and most of the people here differ, we believe in civil rights for all, not just the ones we agree with.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
57. I never once said that you have to "accept" that right wing crap
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 10:46 AM
Jul 2012

You don't have to accept anything, but the fact remains that civil rights cover all, not just those we agree with, whether you like it or not.
I don't like their racist shit either, but I do "accept" the fact that they have a fundamental right to spew it and I will always defend their right to spew, unlike you who would try to take away the civil rights of people you disagree with as proven by this:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=118&topic_id=471849#471995
Those are your words, no mistaking them.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
61. That's the dumbest, most self-contradicting statement I've seen so far today....
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:01 PM
Jul 2012

but it is early still...



 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
63. LOL
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:47 PM
Jul 2012

I just caught that, he contradicts himself in the same sentence.
I wonder if he realizes his hypocrisy?

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
60. Hoyt wants them shot by government agents. In the face.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 11:58 AM
Jul 2012

And it would be all their own fault simply because they didn't worship at the Church of Hoyt.

But they're the bigots.... ri-i-i-ight.....



Edit: I better be sure to mention that this is merely my own opinion, not a statement of fact, and any resembelence to reality is purely in the bias of the reader.

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
66. Ah yes
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 03:19 PM
Jul 2012

militia groups, gotta love em'. I say as long as they are not doing anything illegal, leave them alone to exercise their constitutional rights. The only real crime most of the time is the harassment these groups get from law enforcement. Many are under constant surveillance and the government is constantly trying to infiltrate their ranks. Bike gangs are far more dangerous.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
74. Timmie McVeigh was a paramilitary gun nut. The Arizona militias shoot immigrants for fun.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 06:19 PM
Jul 2012

The fuckers above are just a bunch of right wing yahoos who enjoy intimidating people with their guns.

The Michigan Militias are a bunch of worthless racists.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
76. "The Arizona militias shoot immigrants for fun."
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 06:43 PM
Jul 2012

Is that just like Jan Brewers' decapitated illegals in the desert?

Or is it some other invented shit?

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
80. You claimed they were "shooting immigrants for fun."
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 06:58 PM
Jul 2012

And for the record, I'm not defending them, I'm refuting your lies.

Cite evidence, or recant your lie.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
97. C'mon
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 09:33 PM
Jul 2012

you know he won't, he posts lies and misrepresentations here all the time and expects us to accept them as the gospel truth.

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
92. There is no evidence that
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 07:39 PM
Jul 2012

any Arizona militia members has shot immigrants, illegal or not. Quite the contrary. It is well documented that civilian border patrol folks helped the people they encountered, giving them food, water and medical attention. Why don't you stop with the hyperbole and engage in some real conversation. I know you have more to offer than to constantly refer to people as racists and gun nuts, certainly you have some opinions on other issues.

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
90. If you are
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 07:28 PM
Jul 2012

referring to McVeigh he was not a militia member. He attended a couple of militia meetings and half-heartedly attempted to start a militia group in Arizona, which came to nothing. He never really joined anything. As far as bike gangs go follow the link and do some reading, you might find it interesting.[link:http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/10/24/mongols-indictment-details-motorcycles-gang%E2%80%99s-racism-alleged-crimes/|]

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
83. C'mon, DU gun-religionists
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 07:01 PM
Jul 2012

If you're in that picture, identify which one of the clowns you are.

Response to Hoyt (Reply #38)

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
72. Not that racist crap again. At least those guys had reasons to be armed at the time. You should be
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 05:23 PM
Jul 2012

ashamed.

 

Tejas

(4,759 posts)
65. What do you suggest, shoot them?
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 03:14 PM
Jul 2012

I don't know the proper way to handle whatever "Tbag gun nuts" are.

sarisataka

(18,663 posts)
68. Yes
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 03:41 PM
Jul 2012

Several times he has stated his support for extrajudicial execution of RW bigots and their families.
They are 'immoral'. Apparently that means their lives are forfeit to the government

 

Tejas

(4,759 posts)
58. Republican agenda - you promote it
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 11:20 AM
Jul 2012

when you parrot the Right Wing teachings of VPC, Brady, et al.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
79. I like the blond in front
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 06:57 PM
Jul 2012

Got her finger ready to fire, close to the trigger.

Who woulda thought crossing the street in a place safe enough to have a "Cold Stone Creamery" and other upscale stores was so dangerous?

Loonies from the Loonie Bin.

sarisataka

(18,663 posts)
85. Her finger is indexed along the receiver
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 07:06 PM
Jul 2012

exactly where any knowledgeable person will tell you it should be. Since she does not have a magazine in place she is limited to at most one shot.

I was surprised that no Cold Stone has ever been robbed, but you should update your stats. They are out of date.
http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=AgCWkEXnTYa3wqk77m4NYv.bvZx4?p=cold+stone+robbery&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-701

I would bet cash money that, on that day, that was the safest street in MI

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
88. Gun tech
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 07:13 PM
Jul 2012

Oh boy oh boy those technical details about those killin' machines are so TOUGH GUY! Wow wow wow!



Yeah, since a Cold Stone Creamery got robbed somewhere, anywhere there is one is a hotbed of violent crime needing lots of guns to keep safe!

sarisataka

(18,663 posts)
91. Helps to know what you are talking about
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 07:38 PM
Jul 2012

so you don't look the fool. Maybe you think the trigger would have been a good place for her finger?

Did you laugh when your momma said "Don't play with matches" or was that too technical for you?

sarisataka

(18,663 posts)
104. It is exactly why
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 10:59 PM
Jul 2012

pro-controllers cannot understand how ludicrous the AWB was; all those 'technical' issues getting in the way of feel good.

Probably couldn't answer because s/he was busy licking jury wounds and counter alerting several posts up.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
108. Rich
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 04:43 PM
Jul 2012

> so you don't look the fool.

Oh, that's rich. A gun-religionist, who worships a death-machine, calling me a fool.

sarisataka

(18,663 posts)
110. I don't believe I ever stated my religious preference
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 06:11 PM
Jul 2012

but I can assure you my dog tags do not say "Death Machine"

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
94. I am pretty sure
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 07:53 PM
Jul 2012

he was joking, he wasn't hoping she had a heart attack....is that the best you can do?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Update from Birmingham, M...