Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumWhy it is difficult to control the ‘cowboys’
Al Araf and Anton Aliabbas, Jakarta
The media coverage of an Army officer who brandished his gun in a street quarrel with a motorcycle rider recently raised concerns about the inappropriate use of arms.
The circulation of small arms has clearly reached a point that puts development sustainability and security in many countries in the world at risk.
The uncontrolled circulation of arms has contributed much to the mounting tension, terrorism or any other security threats to a country, such as what has happened in Darfur, Sudan and Rwanda.
The United States Department of Public Information defines small arms as specially designed weaponries for personal use, such as revolvers, automatic guns, rifles and light machine guns.
http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2012/05/22/why-it-difficult-control-cowboys.html
zzaapp
(531 posts)ileus
(15,396 posts)Glaug-Eldare
(1,089 posts)ileus
(15,396 posts)Donald Driver, new winner of dancing with the stars.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)zzaapp
(531 posts)spin
(17,493 posts)From the link in the OP:
However, fundamental changes have happened after concerns were raised about the increasing security threat posed by firearms in Indonesia in 2010. Citizen aged 1865 can possess weapons for the reason of recreation instead for self-defense and protection.
Only rubber bullets and gas firearms are permitted for self-defense, with the requirements of the submission procedure similar to permitting ownership of firearms ammunition.
http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2012/05/22/why-it-difficult-control-cowboys.html
I hear the bad guys like to use machetes over there. Such weapons are called goloks
Golok
The golok is a type of machete or broadsword originating in Southeast Asia. The word golok (sometimes misspelled as "gollock" is of Indonesian origin[citation needed] but is also used in Malaysia and is known as gulok in the Philippines. In Malaysia it is usually interchangeable with parang.
The Golok style is noted for being the pattern for British Army-issue machetes used since the early 1950s.
Sizes and weights vary, as does blade shape. Golok tend to be heavier and shorter than machetes, often being used for bush and branch cutting. Having either a primary grind or an edgewise taper, the golok is less likely to jam in green wood than the flat-sided machete.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golok
I owned a Golok style British Army machete. I could easily chop through a one inch diameter sapling or branch with one swipe. I wouldn't want to go up against an attacker armed with such a weapon with only rubber bullets in my handgun. If fact I wouldn't want to try to stop such an attacker with my 12 gauge coach gun loaded with double-aught buck.
edited for typo
zzaapp
(531 posts)discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,482 posts)...control is a degree of slavery.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,482 posts)Self control rocks! If only there was more of it.
DanM
(341 posts)No thanks, I think I like it better here in the US.
rl6214
(8,142 posts)That's right, NOTHING.
DanM
(341 posts)Consider articles like this as reminders to maintain constant vigilance against the anti-gunners.
Also, if you notice, the complete article made reference to UN anti-gun rights efforts, which should be of direct concern to you today.
Simo 1939_1940
(768 posts)Glaug-Eldare
(1,089 posts)SkatmanRoth
(843 posts)Simo 1939_1940
(768 posts)of the U.N. headquarters in N.Y.C. for those who may have been unaware.
rl6214
(8,142 posts)You are completely right there.
Clames
(2,038 posts)...OP. That level of hand wringing certainly has to restrict blood circulation at some point.
ileus
(15,396 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)Last edited Thu May 24, 2012, 07:50 PM - Edit history (1)
I'm guessing this was his military issue weapon, which has what to do with us? It is pretty safe to assume that the writer is totally clueless or dishonest about Sudan and Rwanda. The article points out abuses by state functionaries and oppressive regimes, yet complains that private ownership is the problem? Not to go Goodwin, but in another time, the writer would be bitching about STENS made in bicycle shops.
security threats and terrorism by state actors.
Darfur is in Sudan.
Is this writer saying that Furs, Zaghawas, and Masalits should not be able to defend themselves against the government (the ones the article thinks should be regulating the guns) and The government's Janjaweed thugs?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Darfur
Stupid and full of shit does not even begin to describe this scribbling. No wonder the paper disabled comments.