Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 07:15 AM Aug 2015

Guns are the problem, not the answer

In 1969, I toted a gun around Vietnam. My fondest desire after coming home was to never carry a weapon again and, to this day, I haven’t.

Don’t get me wrong; I was glad to be armed back then because things got hairy once in a while. But there is no comparing a war zone like Vietnam (or Iraq or Afghanistan) to life in Fort Collins, or Denver or even the south side of Chicago.

Gun enthusiasts and the NRA would have you believe that today’s America is a scary place. Statistically, it’s not … for most citizens there’s little to be afraid of regarding gun violence. The argument that everyone should be armed to the teeth to protect person and property is simply a marketing ploy used to sell more guns.

Yes, terrible gun violence has occurred in 2015: the recent Lafayette, Louisiana, theater shooting spree; the Chattanooga Marine killings; the Charleston church massacre. Yet each one of these incidents can be explained by the shooter’s mindset … mental illness, lone-wolf terrorism, bigotry.

http://www.coloradoan.com/story/opinion/2015/08/03/soapbox-guns-problem-answer/31088053/
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Guns are the problem, not the answer (Original Post) SecularMotion Aug 2015 OP
"Yet each one of these incidents can be explained by the shooter’s mindset … mental illness..." Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2015 #1
I find some portions of the editorial odd and inconsistent. branford Aug 2015 #2
This guy (except it was the Korean war) was my World Literature professor in college. ileus Aug 2015 #3
You have an SOP violation sarisataka Aug 2015 #4
does not seem to matter as long as Duckhunter935 Aug 2015 #7
Criminals are the problem. Locking them up is the answer. the band leader Aug 2015 #5
That's your problem, not mine. n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Aug 2015 #6

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
1. "Yet each one of these incidents can be explained by the shooter’s mindset … mental illness..."
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 07:25 AM
Aug 2015

Why no mention of Garland, Texas?

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
2. I find some portions of the editorial odd and inconsistent.
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 08:06 AM
Aug 2015
Yes, terrible gun violence has occurred in 2015: the recent Lafayette, Louisiana, theater shooting spree; the Chattanooga Marine killings; the Charleston church massacre. Yet each one of these incidents can be explained by the shooter’s mindset … mental illness, lone-wolf terrorism, bigotry.


What does that even mean? You're just as dead or injured if the motivations behind violence are "mental illness, lone-wolf terrorism, [and] bigotry" as you would be with more "routine" crime, and a person's right to self defense would remain unchanged.

Gun enthusiasts and the NRA would have you believe that today’s America is a scary place. Statistically, it’s not … for most citizens there’s little to be afraid of regarding gun violence. The argument that everyone should be armed to the teeth to protect person and property is simply a marketing ploy used to sell more guns.


Statistically, my house is unlikely to burn down or be broken into, yet I maintain a fire extinguisher and costly insurance, and that generally concerns property damage, not my life or those of my loved ones. It's a personalized cost benefit analysis, and citing general statistics fails to reflect individualized circumstances and dispositive factors such as where a person lives and works, age, infirmity or disability, profession, race, gender, etc. In fact, I choose not to own firearms, and respect similar choices in others. I simply will not substitute my judgment for anyone else, no less tinker with the Bill of Rights because of fear and loathing of an inanimate object.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
3. This guy (except it was the Korean war) was my World Literature professor in college.
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 11:43 AM
Aug 2015

He started out endorsing Ross, then Clinton, then Ross again when he got back in the race.


I still remember his goofy rant about how Uncle Sam put a gun in his hand and sent him to Korea, and how "to this day" hadn't touched a gun since.


Poor Guy...


While I know my area is pretty safe that's no reason not to go around prepared.


Sad news is I'll be heading to Boca Raton this Sunday while we're driving down, I'll be flying back and knowing how they love to trap good citizens and make them criminals...so a fishing rod will be my only weapon I take with me to training.



I suppose since the author believes America is a safe place he's fully supports our 2A rights???

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
7. does not seem to matter as long as
Tue Aug 4, 2015, 07:52 PM
Aug 2015

they are the chosen ones allowed to post.

I love the selective enforcement.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Guns are the problem, not...