Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,896 posts)
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 12:34 AM Jul 2015

New Bill Targets ‘Boyfriend Loophole’ in Domestic Violence Gun Cases

After gaining momentum at the state level, a push to make it harder for domestic abusers and stalkers to possess firearms is gathering bipartisan support in Congress.

In a press conference Wednesday morning, Democrat Congresswoman Debbie Dingell of Michigan and Republican Congressman Robert Dold of Illinois announced H.R. 3130, the Zero Tolerance for Domestic Abusers Act. The bill, which is identical to one introduced by Democrat Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota in 2013, would close several loopholes in existing law that experts in domestic violence prevention say allow abusers easy access to guns.

“I don’t look at this as a gun bill,” said Rep. Dingell in an interview with Bloomberg. “I look at this as a domestic violence bill.”

The legislation would close the so-called “boyfriend loophole,” amending current law to include convicted abusers of current or former “dating partners” among those who are prohibited from owning guns under the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act. It would also prohibit gun ownership by anyone convicted of stalking.


http://www.thetrace.org/2015/07/congress-domestic-violence-boyfriend-loophole/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New Bill Targets ‘Boyfriend Loophole’ in Domestic Violence Gun Cases (Original Post) RandySF Jul 2015 OP
Convicted is the key word here Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #1
Convicted = due process discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #2
I've never understood how someone can upset you enough ileus Jul 2015 #3
My guess is Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #4
So I read "boyfriend loophole" and *completely* mistook it for something else. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #5
Is this appended to the "Deadbeat Dads" legislation? Eleanors38 Jul 2015 #6

ileus

(15,396 posts)
3. I've never understood how someone can upset you enough
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 07:00 AM
Jul 2015

to harm them.

Wonder how many are abusers of drink or drugs???

As a user of neither I've never hit anyone since 6th grade.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
5. So I read "boyfriend loophole" and *completely* mistook it for something else.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 08:22 AM
Jul 2015

I -- uh -- I'll just be over here. You guys carry on without me.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
6. Is this appended to the "Deadbeat Dads" legislation?
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 11:04 AM
Jul 2015


Does the Trace regularly use the expression "Democrat Congresswoman...?"



As long as their is a conviction and due process, I see no problem here. Except for the routine gaffs in this "story."
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»New Bill Targets ‘Boyfrie...