Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumCaution fellow Pro2A DUers. The Hide forces are organized. Anything goes...
in the way of insult, denigration, smear, and untruths. You know the drill.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)edgineered
(2,101 posts)a Week of WOES Award in the Pastafarian Group.
WOES (walking on egg shells) is a sad fact of life on this board. Anytime anyone in the real world affronts our alert stalkers all members of a given group are forced to walk on egg shells, hence the Week of WOES Award.
It looks like this group wins ? again.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)I have found myself doing that a lot as a firearms owner and DU member.
appal_jack
(3,813 posts)The gnashing of teeth by castle bansalot is unlikely to translate into real world action.
-app
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)The people in bansalot are so scared of RKBA, they rad to Skinner to try and get this group removed, another epic fail.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)Shamash
(597 posts)While you're here, perhaps you could define exactly what you mean by "gun troll"? Since I was part of a discussion of whose participants you said:
I just wanted to see that if I, as a supporter of same-sex marriage rights, womens reproductive rights, prosecuting Bush for war crimes, improvement of background check laws and having been a Democratic voter longer than you've been alive kind of person, avoid meeting your definition of "fucking gun troll".
Clearing that up for all of us so that we see you only use the term "fucking gun troll" appropriately and in the spirit of liberal tolerance and comity with which it was no doubt intended when applied to your fellow liberal DUers, would do a great deal towards clearing your reputation of any scurrilous accusations that you're a vacuous, intolerant hack.
This sort of clarity might also get Skinner off your back when you call people "assholes", if you could just explain how you meant it to be a considerate and constructive form of criticism.
beevul
(12,194 posts)What with the repeated assertions by his members that our group should be done away with by Admin.
(Do I really need to cite any?)
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)nt
Straw Man
(6,625 posts)Otherwise you really wouldn't be justified in making it, would you?
Shamash
(597 posts)You clearly had specific users in mind when you were talking about that particular story, otherwise you would not think the admins could "clean house" of them. The way you talked about it, it sounds like you got dogpiled by a whole pack of them.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Since you are so informed.
I love how you always make unsubstantiated accusations of RKBA members and when challenged go running away.
Put up up or shut up, let's see you post some names or just apologize to us right now.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)beevul
(12,194 posts)There is a word for that.
And that word would tend to indicate behavior unbecoming a group host.
<braces self for malicious alert>
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)I know of one poster that has a very thin skin from experience. From one of my hides.
Calling out the host (EM) of a safe haven group (GCRA) that this person (duckhunter) has long been blocked from (gun nuts not allowed), for something not even written by that host. Hosts aren't responsible for everything posted by other members. This arrogant gun nut needs to be reminded what website they are on, and they are not on ar15.com.
Intentionally rude, hurtful, inappropriate = hide.
I like the insult in the alert itself, I am curious who the alerter might be? Only the shadow knows.......
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)and when I do unlike others I will admit to it. I think it is better to show how you can not back up your claims when challenged here. It tends to make your points even less effective as other posters see the baseless accusations you post here. Of course you can always go back to the back slapping group over in bansalot that you host and post all you want without being challenged.
Shamash
(597 posts)I mean, you've defined a "fucking gun troll" in a way that makes them people who are in clear violation of DU's terms of service and should be banned:
Calling these people out would be a public service and the site admins would surely be on your side.
And the context of your other statements makes it clear that you identified more than one person of that type.
Just think of what it would do to your sterling reputation to make an accusation like that and not follow through with evidence to support it. Besides, you owe it to the DU community to immediately provide proof of this gross misconduct to the admins so that they can take strong action against malicious, unprincipled types who are clueless as to what being a liberal is all about.
I for one most sincerely hope that they do.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)But it would be a great service to DU and MIRT.
beevul
(12,194 posts)Thank you, I needed that, but I'm glad I wasn't drinking anything, because my monitor certainly doesn't.
ileus
(15,396 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)and I am quite sure we all know who the ones that are doing the alerting are. It just proves again that some are more equal here than others. If I am on a jury, I always vote on the content of the post not my opinion on the poster or subject. Remember star members to carefully use all of your jury blacklist slots. This helped me out greatly and also be very polite in your posts so they have nothing to alert on.
beevul
(12,194 posts)Yes, this 100 times. If they eat enough failed alerts, it will both discourage their bad alerting, while highlighting it for all to see.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)A bonus as it were. 😀
beevul
(12,194 posts)The new tactic seems to be to wait until long drawn arguments are well under way, then mass multiple alert on multiple posts by an RKBAer who has been very active in said discussion, in the hopes that one or two are hidden by an anti-gun biased jury.
But rest easy, I have been assured by our colleagues on the other side of the issue, that there is no culture war.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Main alert stalkers. They tend to be active in those particular posts. I think we know who they are.
marble falls
(57,099 posts)of gun ownership on simmer for even a week? Nine people were killed by a legally owned gun. What are we going to do about that?????
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)It is absurd to think a serious discussion site should allow one group to dump its HATEFUL bile slop bucket on another with Impunity.
Not going to happen, esp. since elbowing ones way to the front of GD'S OP line with a shopping list of nastiness is an EXPLICIT tactic of the controller/banners.
Victimhood? No just a dishonest, hypocritical, holier-than-thou hatefest which Should be countered.
I am still curious as to how such a group of supposed liberals has carved out a moral exception, all for themselves.
No. No free passes.
marble falls
(57,099 posts)than they are now? How exactly as a gun owner am I threatened? A little time to cool would be good for both sides.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)The question you raise about guns is not germane. Guns are as available as they have been since the Civil Rights laws put paid to Jim (large, raucous black bird) gun laws in the sourth, and the concealed carry movement. The gun used in Charleston was designed in c1911. Crime rates are down.
I'm perplexed by your "threatened" reference. This is not a question of threat, but of abusive discussion and other crap found on troll sites, as stated above.
I think what you want is for ONE (1) side to cool down, and for the other to get free reign to pursue an avowed agenda of shaming, taking advantage of a tragedy, and conducting most especially a culture war based on some of the worst hate speech I've seen since the last eruption here. If the "other side" showed some modicum of sympathy or empathy toward the victims of this racist terrorism, then I could let even a few gratuitous remarks slide. But it's a tide of sewage in service of an explicit tactic.
I would prefer to find out if this racist killer has a network, if he follows certain current public figures, if he has cohorts (you heard of the incident in Richmond the day after?). But we hear instead the same doctrines, plugged-in to the Adam Lanza model, and first in line.
Don't you think this incident is a hellnof a lot bigger than a gun?
Thanks for your civil tone in this exchange.
marble falls
(57,099 posts)We are legally allowed in most states to own magazines over 30 rounds, in some states automatic rifles, "supressors" - silencers, never has there been more lenient laws. I've lived in Arizona so open carry does not bother me a bit. But here in Texas a conceal carry permit need only something like 8 hours of classes.
What happened last Tuesday won't challenge my rights to own firearms a scintilla. Sandy Hook didn't and it was a lot more victims, white and young children and it didn't change anything and that "event" didn't even have political bend except the right to own arms.
We who appreciate our second amendment rights should at least have the grace to allow them to mourn their dead.
Its really not at all about your or my right to own firearms.
Sorry if we can't agree.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)...the other can put it off until their rage subsides.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)To be able to purchase full up machine guns and other weapons mail order without any background check.
marble falls
(57,099 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)machine guns or weapons without a background check from an FFL. All machine guns are transferred and tracked via the federal government. I fact all firearms purchases at any gun show booth that has an FFL must have a federal background check.
marble falls
(57,099 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)even in Texas and Oklahoma. Any booth that has an FFL must follow all federal and state laws and must conduct a federal NICS background check prior to sale.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)If you know of someone who is selling silencers or machine guns without the required background check and registration, please call the ATF at this number
https://www.atf.gov/contact/hotlines
Shamash
(597 posts)Item #1 here.
The entire comment section at that link is a good example of how far certain people will go to avoid answering straight questions on the topic.
As for how exactly you are threatened, simply ask anyone on the gun control side which regulations or laws, if any, they think are excessive and should be repealed. The answer will be "none". The answer has always been "none", even after new laws are passed. The lack of answers on the links' question on magazine limits is a good example. They won't say "this is as low as we ever need to go". It is always "we want more restrictions".
It's exactly the same ratchet abortion opponents use, and exactly as ethical.
beevul
(12,194 posts)Very well said indeed.
They've had a stack of blank passes long enough, and shown to my satisfaction that they're only capable of abusing them.
Treat those blank passes the way they want to treat guns, and see how they howl with rage.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)but it seems everyone else of a different view gets a key to the frat house back bedroom.
There is an implicit assumption that pro2A folks get to be a punching bag every time. Not anymore.
Shamash
(597 posts)virginia mountainman
(5,046 posts)of car ownership on simmer for even a week? Nine people were killed by a legally owned car. What are we going to do about that?????
http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1727590/driver-crash-killed-nine-people-shenzhen-airport-panicked-after-hearing
Driver who killed nine people at Shenzhen airport 'panicked after hearing car horns'
Children and their grandparents are among the victims who were struck by a car on five-lane overpass as they watched aircraft at Shenzhen Baoan International Airport, police say.
----------------------------------------------------
If anyone has any idea to deal with the racist crazies in society, without turning us into a police state, I am all ears.
edbermac
(15,940 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Sat Jun 20, 2015, 08:22 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Caution fellow Pro2A DUers. The Hide forces are organized. Anything goes...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172169308
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Please hide this meta-bullshit
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Jun 20, 2015, 08:28 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: A bullshit alert swarm.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: meh
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't get it, is it some kind of code?
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
edgineered
(2,101 posts)look at that - Not one broken egg shell
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Shamash
(597 posts)Who'd a thunk that a post talking about abusive hiders would get juried for its subject matter by abusive hiders?
Somewhere, there is an entire shed of tools that need sharpening.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)Shamash
(597 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)7-0 someone got spanked! Wonder who it could be, hmmmmmmm
beevul
(12,194 posts)Someone can't alert for 24 hours, with no corresponding gain.
Awww. Whoever they were, they're sure to be feeling like a Delicate Flower, right about now.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Ahh, the hypocrisy drips from your words. eom.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6792499
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Rude personal attack, intended to be hurtful, and unable to back it up either (see down-thread). We shouldn't stand for baseless accusations of hypocrisy. If you're going to call someone a hypocrite, be ready to back it up.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Jun 6, 2015, 09:14 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This has the be the same asshole who unsuccessfully alerted on the same DUer yesterday with almost the same comments "Rude personal attack, intended to be hurtful, not discussing the issue at hand. 1 more hide and they're back in timeout yet again, so please do hide". Take a powder shithead, you're abusing you alerting privileges.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Being right or wrong about hypocrisy on DU is not a violation of the TOS, nor is it a personal attack or inappropriately rude. *sigh*
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This is a proportional response to obvious shit-stirring. EM jumped into the thread with a person attack, trolling for a reason to alert, I'd bet. GG shouldn't take the bait, but I'm inclined to let them argue it out in this mutual slap-fight.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
I happen to know who the alerter is but will not name him
beevul
(12,194 posts)This was a blatant attempt, to manipulate the system toward silencing a specific individual poster, for something other than the content of the post.
I think admin should see that.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)and he does not have the fortitude to say it was him. Kind of like it would embarrass him as it should. Of course I asked him several times in the open and once by IM if it were him or to deny it and he would not answer that simple question. I take my hides and I truly believe some are legitimate but some are just so surprising, like the one where I apologized. There is a person that I think alerts on almost anything I post in a thread he is part of, hoping to get me a vacation or stoned. That just causes me to be even more polite and it just drives him nuts I am still around. I think he thought he got me when he stalked me with several hides and my account went to review. Guess what I am still here!
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)...for my (obviously) humorously-intended little poke at Hoyt and his infamous "can of beans" line.
Some people's pretensions of being "progressive" when their attitudes and actions are anything but are genuinely annoying, in the way that only pungent hypocrisy can be.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Sometimes you can tell in the alert body.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Calling out the host (EM) of a safe haven group (GCRA) that this person (duckhunter) has long been blocked from (gun nuts not allowed), for something not even written by that host. Hosts aren't responsible for everything posted by other members. This arrogant gun nut needs to be reminded what website they are on, and they are not on ar15.com.
Intentionally rude, hurtful, inappropriate = hide.
I like the personal insult directed at me the alerter included, lol
beevul
(12,194 posts)This is what I got sent by the forum host when I was blocked for a mistaken post over there, which I deleted and reposted here where I intended it:
They're an understanding bunch, aren't they?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)a person blocked for a self deleted post. If that is not abusing the host powers, I do not know what is. How is that an SOP violation?
I am so glad he can post in this group and it is his favorite group as he can be challenged and show how he really is.
ileus
(15,396 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)blueridge3210
(1,401 posts)SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)[center][/center]
blueridge3210
(1,401 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)That require a safe haven and has a host that blocked a person for a self deleted post.
That's a first for me.
blueridge3210
(1,401 posts)Those delicate flowers.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)with his baseless accusations trying to stir the pot and and hoping to alert and get a hide
55. Someone who keeps on getting banned and re-registering just to talk about guns? Yep, that's a troll.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=169424
Of course he made the accusation and now will not respond after being challenged, surprise. We can challenge in this group and not worry about being blocked unlike the other group that is so scared of debate.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Clearly, "fuck you" and several slanderous, insulting (and hilariously illogical) assertions about gun owners here at DU are hunky-dory. This shit gets excused because "emotions are running high" over the latest big story.
But I get hidden and called "cowardly" for a little good-natured poke at Hoyt, who I'm sure had no problem with my post.
This is why I tend to take long vacations from this formerly-wonderful site and do vastly more postin gon DI.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Try and figure that one out, lol
ileus
(15,396 posts)They normally get all worked up and let their emotions, prejudice, and seething hate get the best of them.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Purveyor
(29,876 posts)way, from one who just got my record 'clean'...
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)And see who is boasting about stirring things up here in this group.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)He/she sees a connection to Bernie Sanders' positions on 2A. I don't know, but the heat between the Sanders and Hillary camps is intensifying.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)I know that NYC_SKP did a stupid thing but I've always had the feeling that there were people just waiting for him to slip up.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)One person just had a post hidden for calling names at gun owners. And posts get hidden for all sorts of reasons, on all sorts of issues, when people take offense at a particular word, or maybe nothing at all. Don't feel like the Lone Ranger. (Can I say that?)