Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 09:48 PM Jan 2015

Newtown school panel to include proposed gun ban in report

By PAT EATON-ROBB
Associated Press

HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) - An advisory panel charged with looking at public safety in the wake of the deadly Newtown school shooting agreed Friday to include in its final report a recommendation to ban the sale and possession of any gun that can fire more than 10 rounds without reloading.

The Sandy Hook Advisory Commission, created by Connecticut Gov. Dannel P. Malloy in the wake of the 2012 school shooting, plans to complete its work next month. The report will include dozens of recommendations in three categories: law enforcement and emergency response; safe school design and operation; and mental health and wellness.

In its interim report last March, the commission included the proposed gun ban, which is opposed by the gun lobby and manufacturers. It would go much further than a 2013 Connecticut law which, among other things, expanded the state's assault weapons ban and barred the possession and sale of large-capacity ammunition magazines.

"Whether or not this law would stand the test of constitutionality is not for this commission to decide," said former Hartford Police Chief Bernard Sullivan, a member of the panel. "The commission has expressed very strongly that this is a statement that is needed regarding the lethality of weapons."

http://www.kxnet.com/story/27869825/newtown-school-panel-to-include-proposed-gun-ban-in-report


This AP article was published in the print edition of the New London Day, but wasn't available on the website. This proposal would ban 3 Million of the 3.5 million firearms in Conn since nearly all handguns and many bolt action firearms are magazine fed.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Newtown school panel to include proposed gun ban in report (Original Post) NutmegYankee Jan 2015 OP
While they're at it... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2015 #1
well I am sure the other group will be happy on that ban Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #2
"Nobody wants to take your guns" beevul Jan 2015 #3
which is opposed by the gun lobby and manufacturers...and citizens. ileus Jan 2015 #4
I guess the new 'large-capacity' magazine ban is already not enough, petronius Jan 2015 #5
The devil is in the details. Straw Man Jan 2015 #6
Might very well be moot depending on how the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals rules Lurks Often Jan 2015 #7

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
1. While they're at it...
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 09:53 PM
Jan 2015

...I'm decidedly averse to bad words, farts, high heels and melted ice cream. Can we please ban them, too?

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
2. well I am sure the other group will be happy on that ban
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 09:56 PM
Jan 2015

That's a big ban that will never happen, thankfully.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
3. "Nobody wants to take your guns"
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 10:01 PM
Jan 2015

"Those people don't have the power, they're just lobbyists".

I wonder what the usual suspects will say next.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
4. which is opposed by the gun lobby and manufacturers...and citizens.
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 10:06 PM
Jan 2015

Not that it matters to these types...

petronius

(26,602 posts)
5. I guess the new 'large-capacity' magazine ban is already not enough,
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 02:16 AM
Jan 2015

before it's even really gotten started...

Straw Man

(6,625 posts)
6. The devil is in the details.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 05:30 AM
Jan 2015

Taken literally, a "gun that can fire more than 10 rounds without reloading" means any gun that can take a detachable magazine, since magazines of virtually any capacity can be manufactured.

That means banning all semi-auto handguns, all centerfire semi-auto rifles, all bolt-action and semi-auto rimfire rifles (.22s, for the laity) except those with tubular magazines holding 10 rounds or fewer, and a number of lever and pump-action rifles as well.

What does it leave? Single-shot break-barrel rifles, of which there are only a handful on the market; fixed-magazine rifles with a capacity of 10 or fewer -- in other words, deer rifles; most shotguns; and revolvers. We're talking about the firearms technology of the late 19th century.

This is on the heels of a 10-round magazine capacity limit and universal background checks. And we're told that the slippery slope is just "gunner paranoia."

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
7. Might very well be moot depending on how the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals rules
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 12:12 PM
Jan 2015

The hearing was December 9th, with a ruling expected in 3-6 months. Both the NY "SAFE" Act and the CT ban were heard at the same time.

If the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals strikes down both laws, do one or both of the states appeal and risk a ruling that would restrict even further what the states can and can not regulate? If the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals upholds the two laws, the civil right gun groups that sued in the first place have already stated that they would appeal to the US Supreme Court and SCOTUS would likely hear the case since such a ruling would conflict with rulings by other Circuit Court of Appeals in other regions.

Keep in mind that Illinois chose NOT to appeal the court decision that ruled Illinois had to allow CCW statewide.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Newtown school panel to i...