Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hack89

(39,171 posts)
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 03:31 PM Dec 2013

Federal Judge Says California Attorney General Kamala Harris Wrong on Gun Control Laws

ROSEVILLE, Calif., Dec. 9, 2013 -- /PRNewswire/ -- In a rejection of California Attorney General Kamala Harris' stance on the rights of law-abiding gun owners, Senior Federal District Court Judge Anthony W. Ishii denied Harris' motion for summary judgement today in a federal civil rights lawsuit filed by The Calguns Foundation, indicating that California's 10-day "waiting period" gun laws are likely unconstitutional.

In his order, Judge Ishii said that Harris has "not presented sufficient evidence to show that the [10-day waiting period laws] passes either intermediate or strict scrutiny."

About the laws being challenged in the case, named plaintiff Jeff Silvester of Hanford, California, said, "I have a license to carry a loaded firearm across the State. It is ridiculous that I have to wait another 10 days to pick up a new firearm when I'm standing there in the gun store lawfully carrying one the whole time."

Judge Ishii was appointed to the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of California by President Bill Clinton in 1997.


Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2013/12/09/5986084/federal-judge-says-california.html#storylink=cpy


A ray of common sense.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal Judge Says California Attorney General Kamala Harris Wrong on Gun Control Laws (Original Post) hack89 Dec 2013 OP
Smart judge bossy22 Dec 2013 #1
It seems she assumed this would be a no brainer DonP Dec 2013 #2
Prior restraint. beevul Dec 2013 #3
She might want to stick to revenge porn. Eleanors38 Dec 2013 #4
Yes, a reasonable and common sense decision by a judge appointed to the bench by a Democrat. nt appal_jack Dec 2013 #5

bossy22

(3,547 posts)
1. Smart judge
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 04:58 PM
Dec 2013

finally someone calls out the "cooling off period" for being illogical if someone already owns a gun. Gunnies have been saying this for years

 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
2. It seems she assumed this would be a no brainer
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 06:57 PM
Dec 2013

Her argument was the state felt the waiting period reduced violence, ergo they needed present no further rationale. I guess they are used to getting away with that in Cali?

I'm thinking she was caught totally off balance when he said the equivalent of, "Ummm, no".

This is going to be interesting, especially since the Governor refused to sign some of the legislation they were trying to ram through.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Federal Judge Says Califo...