Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forum400,000 new Illinois Gun owners in 2 years
The Illinois State Police said there is still a backlog of over 65,000 applications for new FOID cards waiting for final approval. No problem with their background checks, just more than the Illinois State Police can handle. In January alone of this year they had 61,172 new FOID applications, over twice what they had in 2012 and over 70,000 new applications in March of this year. These numbers do not include renewals (every 10 years).
In total over the last 2 years, FOID card holders (e.g. new gun owners) have swollen from 1.2 million to over 1.6 million citizens/voters, not counting the current backlog of applications. With the new Dem written and approved concealed carry law going into effect in January of 2014 that number is expected to continue to grow as 400,000 are expected to apply for CCW status in the first year alone and an FOID card is required for the application. How can that be in a all blue state?
Hey! I have been assured several times that there were no new gun owners, in fact there are fewer and fewer of them, just gun nuts building up their arsenals? I'm sure the Illinois State Police are just shills for the NRA. Or maybe all those people don't really plan on buying a gun and just went through all the hoops, finding the application form, getting photos taken, paying for background checks etc. to say they have one just for the status value.
No new gun owners and fewer and fewer people are buying guns. Now why is that so hard to believe based on the evidence to the contrary? I know, because it's a bullshit line, just like the phony "90% agree on gun control" fairy tale.
In the meantime, except in Chicago of course, violent crime continues to fall per the recent FBI UCR.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)bossy22
(3,547 posts)Gee....guess FBI statistics haven't gotten the memo
1. You math sucks
2. That's not a nice thing to say about an all blue state and laws proposed and passed by an all Dem house and senate, are you some kind of GOP agitator?
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)An increase in Oldsmobile sales.
Banners take note.
Thy another approach, like education and safety trainings,
Better background checks, etc.
Loudly
(2,436 posts)Japan is the model. Not this shit.
bossy22
(3,547 posts)Completely different cultures
Loudly
(2,436 posts)But Plessy finally met Brown, didn't it.
DonP
(6,185 posts)Stop back in another 70 some years and we'll see how it's going for your side of the imaginary debate.
Loudly
(2,436 posts)I am doubtful it will take that long.
Progress happens at a faster pace now.
DonP
(6,185 posts)In less than 20 years we've gone to universal concealed carry. All 50 states have it now and the gun control activists, in spite of all the hand wringing, predictions of violence on every corner and whining couldn't stop it, even here in all blue Illinois.
In another few years you'll probably see national CCW reciprocity and the repeal by courts of these recent round of gun control laws in New York, Maryland etc. Hickenlooper in Colorado is already backing away slowly from the gun control laws he signed, with an election next year and a fired up pro 2nd voting bloc.
Even the "May Issue" states are now holding on by their fingernails to keep cases out of court on the discriminatory nature of it.
In the meantime ... crime continues to drop in spite of all the "Blood in the streets" predictions.
Loudly
(2,436 posts)It's not wholesome babe.
It's a death cult.
DonP
(6,185 posts)I know what firearms are and how both dangerous and essential they can be at times.
Shooting sports is just one of my interests, I don't obsess online about it every day and comb Google every night for crime stories I can use to try and "one up" those that disagree with me on the issue.
I don't sit around whining online about legal choices other people make, like some lachrymose Fundie, demanding everyone see abortion the way he does.
I don't imagine the real world ever being weapons free, because I know history and I see no practical strategy from your side on how to disarm the criminals without disarming the law abiding first and "hoping for the best".
I'm not waiting for some magical change in SCOTUS decisions on the 2nd that will reverse the last decades of rulings.
I'm not a hyprocrite, embracing Mike "Stop and Frisk the Black and Brown Guys" Bloomberg and his fellow 1%ers, because they'll pick up the tab for gun control efforts so none of you have to actually do anything.
I don't treat crimes like some twisted, fucked up game show, awarding imaginary points for death and misfortune. Treating the law abiding and innocent as equals with criminals and rapists. And you think we're insensitive!
I also didn't fuck up and have to sneak back onto DU with a different name several times.
But most of all, I'm not pathetic and whiny about what I think on this issue.
Loudly
(2,436 posts)As being an exceedingly dangerous person.
DonP
(6,185 posts)Loudly
(2,436 posts)And when you inform me that more of us are eating excrement with a knife and fork.
And drinking thirstily from a tall flask of urine.
My only and natural reaction is Yuck!
Feh!
And how sick does someone need to be to rejoice in it?
DonP
(6,185 posts)Then I'm sure you must be VERY active in gun control in Illinois.
We're you outside Mega Sports in Plainfield or GAT Guns in East Dundee with protest signs supporting Gun control and trying to discourage people from getting new FOID cards?
Maybe you drove your self down to Springfield back in March with a carload of like minded citizens, to protest Concealed Carry to counter I-GOLD with 10,000 marching?
Tell us, how many protests have you been involved in here while the whole CCW legislation was being resolved.
Or do you just sit on the couch and whine about what's happening?
What I "rejoice in" is people being able to make their own choices instead of letting some uninformed dim bulb tell them what's good for them.
Now go play and award some "points" for crimes.
Loudly
(2,436 posts)You just told me that 2000 of my fellow Illinoisans eat excrement with a knife and fork every day of the goddamned week.
That's supposed to motivate me? That they can't tell what they're eating?
DonP
(6,185 posts)No wonder, with "charming" people like you in their ranks of inactive complainers, gun control sucks politically.
Buh Bye! Not worth even trying to talk to another Rahmbot.
beevul
(12,194 posts)Loudly
(2,436 posts)and it's the second one that stung.
So far.
beevul
(12,194 posts)blueridge3210
(1,401 posts)rrneck
(17,671 posts)discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)I don't think the "90% agree on gun control" line wrong. I do think that 90% of that 90% think we already have 99% of all we need in the way of gun laws.
ileus
(15,396 posts)True 2A progress.
otohara
(24,135 posts)to one of the thousands of men carrying guns now.
Numerous studies have found that the chance of a homicide increases dramatically in domestic violence cases in which the perpetrator has a gun. Of all females killed with firearms, almost two-thirds were murdered by intimate partners. The Violence Policy Center reported that in 2010, more women were shot and killed by partners than by strangers using all other weapons combined.
http://www.buffalonews.com/opinion/another-voice/another-voice-courts-ruling-in-domestic-violence-case-could-imperil-women-20131005
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)and are not done by any reputable researchers. Claiming that the VPC reported anything is about as valid as the NRA or GOA claiming gun ownership deters alien invasions.
ileus
(15,396 posts)I know almost as many females with CHPs as I do males.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Because, at the expense of sounding sexist, I think most men are stronger than most women. What your studies are saying isn't that DV increases with the presence of guns, it's saying DV continues unabated when the abuser decides he only wants to torture, rather than outright kill, his victim.
Since restraining orders are and law enforcement are essentially useless the only thing anti-2A advocates can offer is decades of unending terror and abuse.
jimmy the one
(2,708 posts)donP: No new gun owners and fewer and fewer people are buying guns. Now why is that so hard to believe based on the evidence to the contrary? because it's a bullshit line, just like the phony "90% agree on gun control" fairy tale.
You contend a 'bs' line from gun control advocates, while basing your premise on your own personal BS line. Whoever contended there were 'no new gun owners' or 'fewer people buying guns'? .. over the past 3 decades gun ownership rates have fallen; people are currently buying guns, but they tend to be previous gunowners buying more. And then you cite a 90% figure for background checks & apply it to gun control in general, phony baloney BS.
DonP: In total over the last 2 years, FOID card holders (e.g. new gun owners) have swollen from 1.2 million to over 1.6 million citizens/voters, not counting the current backlog of applications.
Out of 12 million citz in Illinois, maybe 8 million adults? figure out the rate & get giddy.
DonP: With the new Dem written {COERCED} and approved concealed carry law going into effect in January of 2014 that number is expected to continue to grow as 400,000 are expected to apply for CCW status in the first year alone and an FOID card is required for the application. How can that be in a all blue state?
Flash to donp, all 50 states allow residents to own guns... 2007 gun ownership rate: 44. Illinois - 20.2% .... http://usliberals.about.com/od/Election2012Factors/a/Gun-Owners-As-Percentage-Of-Each-States-Population.htm
donP: Hey! I have been assured several times that there were no new gun owners, in fact there are fewer and fewer of them, just gun nuts building up their arsenals?
Source please, link to something seriously claiming there were 'no new gun owners'. Thanks. A big part of current gun sales is indeed your latter observation about gunnuts building up arsenals.
donP: I'm sure the Illinois State Police are just shills for the NRA. .. In the meantime, except in Chicago of course, violent crime continues to fall per the recent FBI UCR.
reuters: Sep 10, 2013 Chicago mayor touts drop in crime .. So far this year, the city's murder rate is down 22% compared with the same period in 2012.. , homicides in Chicago are down to 286 from 366 in 2012, but they are up from 278 in 2011 http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/10/us-usa-crime-chicago-idUSBRE9891F620130910
Shouldn't you desperately be trying to give new Chicago guns the credit? All you poststarted about is a backlog of Illinois BG checks & new applications for FOID cards, while interesting hardly much good news for gunworld. You then devoted most of the OP to your own misconceptions, propagunda, half truths & outright lies, in a very sloppy presentation which shouldn't get much credibility from unbiased readers. Juvenile report.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)I love it when one of our resident wingnuts is exposed as another shill for the gun lobby.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)the finest plasticware he could find. Chicago had 500 murders in 2012. I don't know where he got the nonsense he does. Oh, none of them were with legal handguns, since they don't exist in Chicago.
rl6214
(8,142 posts)Especially when it fits your agenda
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Oh, right, calling out wingnuts and congratulating those who verbally eviscerate them with the truth. Quite an agenda.
rl6214
(8,142 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)Actually, any drop is returning to the 1950s levels. That is assuming there is a drop, most people lie to pollsters on some things.
DonP
(6,185 posts)After all, why should the stupid Illinois State Police know how many FOID cards they've issued or how many new firearms are being sold? And why do you keep overlooking the Chicago murder rate and quoting that Union Busting thug Rahm's press releases on percentage reductions, as if they were honest?
Later you can explain how an entirely Dem run legislature was coerced into not only passing but actually writing a concealed carry law. Make up your mind, is the NRA a powerless bunch of weenies, or are they Masters of the Illuminati and able to force lifetime progressives that have run this state for 3 decades into doing their bidding. We're breathless to hear your insights into how the NRA co-opted Mike Madigan, speaker for 32 years here.
Of course the Chicago murder rate is down, last year it was way the hell up by double digits over prior years, that's why they are always careful about how they talk about it so the stupid as shit people don't notice. But I'm sure all 23 people shot up last weekend, 13 in one incident agree with you and your beloved 3d way Rahm about how much better Chicago is now.
Meanwhile, back in the real world ... while you were so "brilliantly" dissecting my post with another round of "Word Salad" Bingo, another 500 or so people signed up for new FOID cards so they can buy new guns. (Average rate of 2,000+ a day so far this year)
That's the problem with you control guys. You actually seem to think a smarmy half-baked online response, that nobody bothers to read, or getting a post hidden is actually some kind of big "activism" win on gun control. Hell, I stopped reading your jumble challenge posts months ago.
OTOH, we just keep teaching more people about the shooting sports and think getting more people out on the range is what counts in the real world.
You kids have fun now and go play nice, the rest of us actually have a hobby we enjoy.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)They HAVE to have this special dispensation and enablement.
It's all they got.
DonP
(6,185 posts)Call us a few repetitive names, use the penis reference every now and then, get a post here and there hidden and get orgasmic over getting someone PPR'd.
In the meantime ... the tide on 2nd right moves on while they hang out and win imaginary battles online.
The whole Illinois CCW thing really seems to chap their nether regions. An all Blue state, run by Dems that wrote and voted in CCW. Kind of goes against their whole weak meme, don't it?
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)How pathetic.
How much courage does it take to post insulting claptrap about gun rights supporters on a progressive board.
None. If there's something that is the antithesis of courage, then that's what it takes to do that.
You're right, it's all they got.
An echo chamber withing an echo chamber with zero tolerance for anyone who suggests alternative points of view, and a running thread in the hosts forum discussing who's going to be banned next.
You know which side is losing when they have to have that much cover on a progressive discussion board.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)for pro-2A folks, or whether they have suffered much the equivalency of being MIRTed. I have seen (or heard?) the same kind of language, as if there was a handbook for all seasons.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Kos was cliquish and huffpost had a pretty random moderation policy, so I stopped wasting my time posting and then eventually stopped reading, too.
There definitely is a set of talking points out there.
Empty shallow sad talking points.
jimmy the one
(2,708 posts)I wrote: Shouldn't you desperately be trying to give new Chicago guns the credit? All you poststarted about is a backlog of Illinois BG checks & new applications for FOID cards, while interesting hardly much good news for gunworld. You then devoted most of the OP to your own misconceptions, propagunda, half truths & outright lies, in a very sloppy presentation which shouldn't get much credibility from unbiased readers. Juvenile report.
Johnston replied: Are you saying drug dealers and gangsters are applying for FOIDs and registering their guns? That's who is doing the killing. Problem is, many of them are too young and the rest wouldn't pass a background check.
Duh, how did you go from what I wrote above, to what you wrote below? voodoo reasoning thy name is Johnston. To wit, what I was 'saying', is what I wrote above. Illogical interpretations are the irresponsibility of the illogical interpreter alone - I can't reason with voodoo.
donP: Later you can explain how an entirely Dem run legislature was coerced into not only passing but actually writing a concealed carry law.
Illinois dem legislatators were coerced into accepting the 'either or' situation of open carry or concealed, & to avoid another supreme rightwing subversion from supreme gunnut scalia, which might've made shall issue law of the land. In order to preserve the sanctity of may issue states, Illinois threw itself under the bus, hoping for better days once the supreme court reestablishes sanity in the gun control arena. ... The rest of your post is more juvenile jibberish.
for instance: DonP: .. we just keep teaching more people about the shooting sports and think getting more people out on the range is what counts in the real world. You kids have fun now and go play nice, the rest of us actually have a hobby we enjoy
If to you that's what 'counts in the real world', that's really sick.
PS's: Thanks stbd tack; (interesting, dot gov websites are down due govt shutdown.)
DonP
(6,185 posts)What's the matter, can't get anybody to respond to you in Castle Bansalot so you come here?
Don't let it get to you. Nobody else gets much of a response there either.
This week over 700 Illinois Concealed Carry instructors were approved by the Illinois State Police. Another 700 are expected to be approved in the next 2 weeks. The state police expect up to 400,000 concealed carry permits to be issued in the first year.
But you keep writing what you think pass for thoughtful, scathing op ed pieces and we'll keep laughing.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)All that frothing and hate-spewing is actually a good sign for us- as it
demonstrates their lack of effectiveness.
DonP
(6,185 posts)The number of FOID cards is a basic fact from the Illinois State Police (ISP), as is the number of CCW instructors approved.
The estimate of number of new CCW permits next year is also straight from the ISP.
Never thought that facts were right wing editorializing?
Hmmm? But I guess when you can't even win the easy ones, and the violent crime rate keeps going down, you're going to be pissed off a lot of the time.
I also heard today that Maryland, with it's new set of gun laws (for now anyway) saw more firearms sold in the 1st 9 months of 2013, than in all of 2011 and 2012 combined! Plus the state police are not enforcing the new laws for anyone that had their paperwork in before the October 1st deadline. I guess the Maryland state troopers were overwhelmed just like Illinois.
Now the Gun Grabbers in the Maryland legislature there are stunned that people rushed to buy the rifles that were being banned. Dumb asses, create a ban, include a grandfather clause and act surprised when people run out to buy what you want to ban?
But they have also created a whole lot of new gun owners/voters too. Or is the meme now back to that there are no new gun owners still? The guys in Maryland were just stocking up? I lose track with these guys.
jimmy the one
(2,708 posts)donP: Funny how just pointing out facts annoys them
I didn't challenge true facts, I challenged your lies & misconceptions, which you tapdance away from above. Here is what I challenged, & what 'annoyed' - are you, donP, calling these statements, facts????:
donP: No new gun owners and fewer and fewer people are buying guns... because it's a bullshit line, just like the phony "90% agree on gun control" fairy tale.
Your claim that gun control advocates ever said 'no new gun owners', is obviously a lie & juvenile hyperbole.
Yes, ~90% supported background checks, but no one ever seriously contended 90% support for all gun control efforts. In other words, you lied.
DonP: With the new Dem written and approved concealed carry law going into effect in January of 2014 that number is expected to continue to grow... How can that be in a all blue state?
More hyperbole, as if loosening ccw rules in a blue state wouldn't unleash red dogs & rightwing cretinism. Why is it so difficult for you to comprehend that republicans & rightwing independents also live in Illinois? You say you've lived there most your life yet don't understand this? then you live in a vacuum. I suspect dem purchases of guns run about the same or less than in blue states, far less than republican purchases. Oh by the way, criminals love the new law.
donP: Hey! I have been assured several times that there were no new gun owners,...
And I asked for a source where you've been assured there were 'no new gun owners' - assured several times (you say) so why the delay in posting a source or two? Because you can't, you haven't been 'assured', you're lying hyperbole is transparent, & there's been no serious contention of 'no new gun owners'.
BIG LIE by donP:.. In the meantime, except in Chicago of course, violent crime continues to fall per the recent FBI UCR.
reuters: Sep 10, 2013 Chicago mayor touts drop in crime .. So far this year, the city's murder rate is down 22% compared with the same period in 2012.. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/10/us-usa-crime-chicago-idUSBRE9891F620130910
Since you didn't retract or acknowledge your above lie, it remains a lie. That's what annoys - not the infrequent 'real' facts you post - but the lies & manipulation & utterly rightwing approach to guns.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)1a. "they tend" is not the same as "they are"
1b. The OP is about Illinois which has only just recently brought its laws into compliance with Constitution.
1c. This is an unsupported claim
1d. the anti-2A mantra has been more guns = more gun violence. They are being objectively proven wrong in real-time.
2a. A rather meaningless point. So what if it's 1/7th of the population? What does that even prove or disprove?
3a. The governor and state legislature are blue. I believe this was his intent, though the OP is free to correct me.
3b. You seem disconnected from the statement you're attempting to rebut. OK, so 20% of Illinois' population owns a gun. How does that refute the assertion that IL is a reliably blue state?
4a. Actually you asserted that very thing in the opening of your rebuttal to which I gave counterpoints 1a thru 1d.
5a. but restrictionist Chicago is still far above the more liberal US
5b. Oddly, the reduction in crime is post-McDonald. We were assured more gun accessibility = more gun violence
jimmy the one
(2,708 posts)I wrote: they {new gun sales} tend to be previous gunowners buying more.
nuclear unicorn wrote: 1a. "they tend" is not the same as "they are"
You must have trouble understanding what 'tend' means in context - a higher proportion. I think most everyone understood what was said, & you are wrong that 'all' new guns sales could go to previous gunowners for of course some new gunsales would go to new buyers - I wrote what I meant to write & if you have trouble comprehending that's your problem. Try thinking things through better before you post, & proofread.
NU: 1b. The OP is about Illinois which has only just recently brought its laws into compliance with Constitution.
Specious & faulty reasoning, Illinois did no such 'compliant' thing. There are about a dozen states, mostly western, which previously allowed for prohibitions on carrying concealed weapons written into their state constitutions, mostly in 1800s. There was then no outcry that this violated the US constitution nor 2ndA, and so far it doesn't.
NU: 1c. This is an unsupported claim --- what is? what is '1c'? ... that donP said 90% support for gun control? and you buy into this bogus fact from donP?
NU: 3a. The governor and state legislature are blue. I believe this was his intent....
You both fail to understand that (generally) once prohibitions are lifted, those inclined to favor the previous proscriptions will flock to get them, & that Illinois rightwingers are the larger part of 'gun buyers'. The case in Maryland is different, since a prohibition is not being lifted but put into place, tho I suspect the rush to buy is still disproportionately higher red.
NucUni: 4a.. you asserted that very thing in the opening of your rebuttal to which I gave counterpoints..
You gave counterpoints which didn't refute a thing I wrote.
NucUni: 5a. but restrictionist Chicago is still far above the more liberal US
Might surprise you to know that 8 of the top ten states with the highest violent crime rates are PRO GUN states.
And, 2011: city ---- viol crime rate .... murder & nn-MS:
Chicago: .................. 1,061.0 ......................15.9
Memphis PROGUN: .... 1,583.5 ......................17.9
Nashville PROGUN ..... 1,181.3 ........................8.2
Miami PROGUN ......... 1,197.6 .......................16.8
Kansas City Mo PROGUN .. 1,199.7 .................23.4
Atlanta PROGUN Ga......1,432.8 ......................20.7
St Louis Mo PROGUN ....1,856.7 ......................35.3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_cities_by_crime_rate
So what are you talking about? when compared with pro gun large cities, Chicago fares better or at parity.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)What you meant was the new of new gun owners were inconsequential. This is a baseless assertion.
Lose the haughty tones. You're not nearly as cool as you pretend.
Specious & faulty reasoning, Illinois did no such 'compliant' thing. There are about a dozen states, mostly western, which previously allowed for prohibitions on carrying concealed weapons written into their state constitutions, mostly in 1800s. There was then no outcry that this violated the US constitution nor 2ndA, and so far it doesn't.
I was referring to the new laws in wake of the McDonald ruling. How the 1800's have anything to do with that is inscrutable. Nor is it relevant since I was addressing the ban on ownership, not CC vs OC.
Someone once said, "if you have trouble comprehending that's your problem."
Considering he can make coherent statements and you have yet to provide countering evidence -- yes.
It's weird how this is always cast as a party affiliation issue with the grabbers. I can't help but think it is really nothing more than an authoritarian impulse to fear an unruly populace.
Really? Because the cities themselves seem to be politically inclined towards gun control.
jimmy the one
(2,708 posts)NucUni: The OP is about Illinois which has only just recently brought its laws into compliance with Constitution
NucUni clarifiying above remark: I was referring to the new laws in wake of the McDonald ruling. How the 1800's have anything to do with that is inscrutable. Nor is it relevant since I was addressing the ban on ownership, not CC vs OC.
Illinois allowed gun ownership prior to McDonald & prior to it's change to shall issue ccw in july2013, thus Illinois had always been in compliance with the constitution - keeping & bearing arms - it only limited them to longguns in certain areas. McDonald ruling extended the types of firearms Illinoisans could keep & bear, is all.
Furthermore, you say the OP was about Illinois, well yes it was & here's the part I replied to: In total over the last 2 years, FOID card holders (e.g. new gun owners) have swollen from 1.2 million to over 1.6 million citizens/voters, not counting the current backlog of applications. With the new Dem written and approved concealed carry law going into effect in January of 2014 that number is expected to continue to grow as 400,000 are expected to apply for CCW status in the first year alone and an FOID card is required for the application. How can that be in a all blue state?
It's quite sequitur to infer you were speaking of the new ccw rules in Illinois as being 'brought into compliance', since that's the only alteration in Illinois which would apply. Thus, state constitutions from the 1800's are ample evidence that concealed carry could be prohibited without violating the bor/2ndA. You post vague & abstruse & complain of inscrutability.
NU: Really? Because the cities themselves seem to be politically inclined towards gun control.
Far less so in red states, I dunno of any serious gun control measures in Houston, dallas, Memphis, Nashville, as compared with LA, nyc, SF..... Democrats support gun control by a margin of about 3 - 1, or ~75% support gc, ~25% are pro gun.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)There were a number of liberal legal scholars that supported McDonald for entirely different reasons.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incorporation_of_the_Bill_of_Rights
DonP
(6,185 posts)Pointless and erratic Wharfgarble non-withstanding ... an amazing ability to ignore the substance and focus on the irrelevant.
So there aren't 400,000 new gun buyers with new FOID cards in the last few years and still growing at 60,000+ a month?
The Illinois State Police don't expect 400,000 new CCW permits in 2014?
Idiot Gun Grabbers never claimed that there are fewer new gun owners, just the same people buying more guns for their arsenals?
Illinois isn't run completely by Democrats, with a grand total of one GOP holding a state office?
The gun control crowd didn't announce in mid year that "90% of America agreed with their proposals for extensive new gun regulation"?
Oh well, this week another batch of CCW instructors were approved by the Illinois State Police, bringing the total to around 1,200 so far. That's another way of pointing out the obvious, that gun control activism is a joke as far as legislative impact goes. You can't even get a single state to consider repealing CCW and many are loosening restrictions.
For all the pompous, poorly reasoned "corrections" and condescension you spew in random directions like a maniac lawn sprinkler with a broken head, it still doesn't do anything but make you feel all warm, kind of like pissing your pants at a bus stop in a navy blue suit in the rain. Nobody else notices but you get to feel all warm about it.
Undoubtedly all the new Illinois instructors must be radical right wingers, because everyone with half a brain - and we certainly have a few here that easily qualify - know that no "Real Dem" would ever be involved in CCW activity.
Except of course for the guys that wrote the law and the Dem Super majorities in both houses that passed it and over rode a ridiculous amendatory veto with an even larger majority, but they can't be real Dems, right? Maybe it's that non-existent right wing Cabal in the Illinois state house? The ones that secretly tell speaker Madigan what to do after he's run the House with a D majority for 32 years?
Pssst, reading an online speech from fuckwad, lying union busting Rahm about crime, proves you know jack and shit, not necessarily in that order, about Illinois or its politics.
Maybe someday I'll be smart enough to be able to figure out how passing CCW in July of 2013, to go into effect in 2014, drove record high FOID Card applications and gun sales in 2010, 2011 and 2012?
I'm sure there's some gun control logic to that "fact", right?
Again, why do you waste all your brilliance up here in the Gungeon, I beg you to share it in your private forum where all you'll get is applause? Oh that's right nobody answers you there.
At least here we're all polite enough to laugh out loud at you.