Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumKid forced to defend his family against other kid.
http://www.newson6.com/global/story.asp?s=22875956HOMINY, Oklahoma - An attempted intruder into a Hominy home is dead after he was shot by a 17-year-old early Thursday, Osage County officials have confirmed.
Cole Davis, 16, was shot as he was trying to break into a home on Pettit Avenue in Hominy. Davis lived in Terlton and had been a student at Mannford Public Schools. Family members confirmed his identity to News On 6.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Just like Joe recommended this 17yo used a shotgun to save lives within his home. In other news drugs (undetermined at this time) kill in more than one way...
While I'm not a fan of shotguns because of their recoil over say an AR, they do get the job done under the right circumstances.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,482 posts)Jenoch
(7,720 posts)10 year old girl and her mother should have just let the crazed home-invader into their house to find out what his intentions were?
rdharma
(6,057 posts)...
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)rdharma
(6,057 posts)friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)I'll be sure to shares that tidbit the next time we're all united....
rdharma
(6,057 posts)Bump the needle..... the same line is repeating ....... over and over!
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)4. Your socks are showing
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3358992
55. Sock ...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023360017
End of discussion.
Cool tool!
rdharma
(6,057 posts)Does that justify shoot to kill?
Give the SOB a butt stroke! Cowards!
hack89
(39,171 posts)And just how do you first determine the intruder is not armed? Looks like an invitation to get yourself shot. But I doubt the safety of the home owner even crosses your mind.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)Drunken kid gets blasted with a shotgun. Wave some flags, y'all!
hack89
(39,171 posts)do you ever think about what you post?
If I verbally challenge the intruder and his response is to immediately shoot me, do you think that is a good thing?
It is simple - you break into my house in the middle of the night, we are not going to have a long conversation. If I cannot immediately determine that you are unarmed, I will assume that you are in fact armed.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Shoot to kill, really? How freaking scared do you have to be to believe that there is someone out there after you to kill you or take your stuff?
The media puts crap out there to make people afraid and they by into it. I'm not saying random evil shit doesn't happen, but it happens much less than people have been programed to believe.
I think unless one' has made some pretty nasty enemies in life, that the probability of being a victim of a violent home invasion while the occupant is there is less likely than hitting the lottery.
One's home is much more likely to be broken into and robbed when no one is home. Which means that the guns one has there to shoot the random evil with will do them no good, but may in fact find it's way into the hands of a random evil doer.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)the benefit of the doubt is right out the window. Sorry.
Those are the stakes of invading someone's home. Ponder carefully before you do it.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Last edited Tue Jul 30, 2013, 11:30 AM - Edit history (1)
If the situation warrants, I'll give such a person a warning. That is, if I can see their hands (and those hands are empty of weapons), and if I'm well out of reach, I won't simply open fire. Any other situation in which someone breaks into my occupied house is going to carry the assumption that they intend harm. I am under no ethical compulsion to assume otherwise.hack89
(39,171 posts)I know that the chances of a violent home invasion is extremely rare in most neighborhoods - there is a reason I do not keep a self defense weapon handy.
But if I lived in a high crime area where home invasions were more common and I found someone in my house, I am going to assume the worse. I refuse to endanger myself or my family just to give a criminal the benefit of the doubt.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)and her 10 year old daughter in the house as well. Is the answer to wait for the intruder to begin assaulting them before intervening?
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)but you can grab your gun and start shooting first.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)going to get there in time. This was a 17 year old and his mother told him to shoot.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)For some reason the kid was panicking, he could have been under the influence of something but he thought someone was trying to kill him.
As the little girl opened the door, Davis put one foot inside and kept screaming, so the woman slammed the door in his face, she said.
He then punched through the window on the door and the woman said she was frightened, so she woke her 17-year-old son and told him to get his gun.
Her son, who is a senior at Hominy High School, grabbed a 12-guage shotgun and fired as Davis reached his hand through the broken glass and turned the doorknob trying to force entry.
"He was swinging on my swing, and I looked out the window and yelled at him," neighbor Donna Watkins said.
The boy then pressed his face up against her window, according to Watkins.
"He looked like he was high or something," she said.
And Davis' family in Terlton told News On 6 they have suspected drug use in the past.
Scared because of his behavior, Watkins said she demanded he leave her property and ran to secure her home.
http://www.newson6.com/global/story.asp?s=22875956
So the kid had broke a window but was not in the house when this woman had her son shoot him. So, I guess you're right. He deserved to die.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)I was not there, so I cannot make the decision on whether the gun was needed or not. The mother thought so.
Who called the cops? Where did it say anything about that? The story never mentioned the woman or either of her children calling the cops, it doesn't appear they had time, or it was not included in the story.
The cops were not going to get to the scene in time to stop whatever a crazed person was going to do to that family after violently breaking into their home at 1 am.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)because he had been to her house first. She told him to go away. Read my excerpt again.
"He was swinging on my swing, and I looked out the window and yelled at him," neighbor Donna Watkins said.
The boy then pressed his face up against her window, according to Watkins.
"He looked like he was high or something," she said.
And Davis' family in Terlton told News On 6 they have suspected drug use in the past.
Scared because of his behavior, Watkins said she demanded he leave her property and ran to secure her home.
http://www.newson6.com/global/story.asp?s=22875956
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)mother and her two children learn that information? All of what you are pointing to is 20/20 hindsight.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)I simply pointed out that there is another alternative to shooting first and asking questions later.
That alternative is asking questions first. I didn't say one could not be armed while asking the questions.
The point that I was trying to make (on my first post) is that the media has stoked the fear level of the (apparently) average citizen in this country so high, that they think there is a boogeyman out there around every corner to get them. AND THERE IS NOT!
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)that the family did not know the cops were called? The neighbor was on the phone with dispatch when the gun was fired.
The mother was in fear for her family's lives. Sure, the whole situation sucks, but that family did not know the intruder was not armed and was not going to harm them. Even now, we do not know that he would not have harmed those people. From the story, it appears the kid was not going to respond to questions about his situation. I do not really look at this as a 'shoot first and ask questions later' situation. There was fear for their lives and they did what they had to do to protect their family.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)I never implied that they knew the police had been called. I simply said that they had been, I didn't say they knew. Why would they even have to know that the cops were called in order to tell the guy to leave, or tell him if he didn't leave, he was going to be shot?
Yep it's that fear thing. The mother was in fear for her family's life and she had a gun handy.
I'm sure the neighbor lady was afraid too but no one got dead at her house. Why do you think that is?
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)then why did you imply they did not need to shoot the kid because the cops had been called?
The lady next door had less fear because the guy left her porch and did not attempt to get inside her house.
This is a tragedy. It is too bad the guy is dead. The family inside the home did not do anything wrong. The mother protected her family.
We only know what was in a short news story of the event. From what we do know from the story is that the family is alive and uninjured. We do not know what would have happened had the intruder gotten inside the house. Everything after that is 20/20. If it were my family, I would not make the same bet on my family's welfare that you seem to be risking.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)"He then punched through the window on the door and the woman said she was frightened, so she woke her 17-year-old son and told him to get his gun.
Her son, who is a senior at Hominy High School, grabbed a 12-guage shotgun and fired as Davis reached his hand through the broken glass and turned the doorknob trying to force entry."
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)rdharma
(6,057 posts)You give him a butt stroke ......then check him for weapons.
Do I need to explain this to y'all?
hack89
(39,171 posts)carry on.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Don't start nothin' won't be nothin'.
(Stay out of other people's fucking houses)
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)rdharma
(6,057 posts)Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)and calling him a coward. and btw you smashed your face with your hand. careful don't hurt yourself. looks painful in that picture.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)Killed a drunken kid..... because he and momma were scared!
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)I do not know about others but, in my book, I would call a man like that a despicable, Lowlife of a Loser.
May you one day stare FEAR straight into the eyes and live to tell the story.
No need to reply. I will not respond.
I am out of this thread and trashing it.
Good bye.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)Was I just advanced for my age? I think not!
Buh-bye, Mr. or Mrs. "nah nah nah I can't hear you I've trashed this thread"! I know you'll be checking this thread.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)This explains much...
rdharma
(6,057 posts)Harr, harr, harr!
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)why he wasn't a Child.
Link Speed
(650 posts)Both were trying to finish off geese when they were hit in the chest by a chambered shell.
'Buttstrokes' only work in movies and games.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)By the way, .... welcome!
Isn't it amazing how all these newbies show up for the first time in the gungeon!
As Gomer Pile would say...... "Surprise, surprise!"
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)In that case, the person is using it on a wounded bird on the ground. When you hold a broom, sweeping the floor, at some point, the end of the broom crosses your chest, right? Same with a shotgun when you use it that way.
Technically no modern shotgun should be capable of firing in that manner, but that's how shit happens, and why you never sweep a human with a hunting rifle (Or shotgun or ANY firearm), no matter how innocently.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Someone certainly is.
You realize you can buttstroke a wounded bird on the ground right? Not much different than someone's face at shoulder level, except you're probably positioned over the end of the barrel to extend that far.
Person you are responding to upthread is implying 2 friends died because their weapons discharged in this position.
Not entirely implausible.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)so if it's 'getting better' perhaps your reading comprehension is getting less faulty.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Link Speed
(650 posts)Heh?
One thing I do know, however, is that any stranger caught crawling thru a window in my house will be leaving on a stretcher.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)Link Speed
(650 posts)Taking time to decide if someone is sober and/or unarmed and/or juvenile or adult can get you killed dead.
I'll choose staying alive, every time. To me, the choice is simple.
Empathy/sympathy/sensitivity have their place(s), but not in that situation. I prefer to live in my house rather than mouldering away in the cold, cold ground.
Shit does happen, y'know. And when it does, I want to watch it go down rather than be caught in the toilet's swirl.
And you still have not enlightened me re: 'buttstroke'.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)How could I have known that they were just Jehova's Witnesses?
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)be beaten to death by fists and feet. I'd love to be immune, really, what's your secret?
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)tumtum
(438 posts)and they can get past my 2 very large German Shepards, I'm not going to say anything, I'll let Mr. Mossberg do my talking.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)Link Speed
(650 posts)Two guys who didn't 'grow up' on video games.
Life is a bitch. Some of us have, quite simply, experienced more of it.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)tumtum
(438 posts)I flew tough machines for a living, but I'm not a tough guy.
You know what else I'm not?
A rude, condescending jerk.
Link Speed
(650 posts)I haven't been around DU for very long, but I have observed that there are more than a few here with a dearth of real-life experience but a wealth of opinion. The firearm thing seems to bring them out in droves.
I prefer vintage wine, whiskey and people.
There is a balance found in vintage.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)They go together!
Link Speed
(650 posts)Absolutely astounding. 100 bucks says you have never won a fight that did not include a keyboard.
The gall of you, making light of two Vietnam vets. Yeah, we are older, but we have been there. Not some fucking fantasy, bit the Real Deal.
I am now officially bored with you.
Oh, yeah, you have yet to enlighten me re: buttstroke.
Another $100 says you have never delivered whatever one of those is, unless the definition does not include a firearm, but a keyboard (or something).
tumtum
(438 posts)1st tour was in a Huey, 2nd was in a Cobra gunship,
Grenada, flew a BlackHawk,
Gulf War, Apache gunship.
And you are right about the dearth of real life experience.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)Sur La Mer ....St. George's.....
Man! That was a hardship tour!
But we kept them from invading Miami!
tumtum
(438 posts)rdharma
(6,057 posts)Well here it 'tis
I did get sun burned. Didn't get a purple heart and I'm still pissed about that! (Do I need to post the sarcasm thingy again?)
I understood it for exactly what it was.
read my post #43, above.
Bathrobes and basements.
I think that there are people on this site that fucking live this site.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)Jenoch
(7,720 posts)are delusional with a post such as this. I just think you don't know any better.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Not so much for the Cheney's and Bush's of the world. (Papa bush notwithstanding)
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)If I hear 'oh shit oh shit, mister call off your dogs', chances are we have no critical problem requiring deadly force. Drunken entry to the wrong house, petty theft, whatever. Doesn't call for deadly force.
I hear one pained yelp out of my dogs (both of whom are teddy bears and would never bite anyone), and I'm going to assume the worst.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)It was about two blocks from my house. He had to come up with a story that the witness could corroborate with him on. The murderer went to some kind of juvenile detention for several years.
ileus
(15,396 posts)rdharma
(6,057 posts)tumtum
(438 posts)rdharma
(6,057 posts)A kid killed another unarmed kid.
tumtum
(438 posts)And you know it.
I said this thread isn't about SYG.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)Do you know what "tumtum" (טאמטאם means in Hebrew?
Just giving you a heads up, my friend.
tumtum
(438 posts)Don't care what it means in Hebrew.
I'm not Jewish.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)But if you use that name in Hebrew speaking circles, you might get some chuckles!
ileus
(15,396 posts)or rather potential victims...
rdharma
(6,057 posts)ileus
(15,396 posts)safety first, victim later.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)Safety first, right? He could have had a gun!
You gun hugging morons are simply amazing!
ileus
(15,396 posts)of black people. (no one should in that case)
On the other hand if you're serious about personal safety SYG helps insure you don't have to be a willing victim first.
The last black kids that come to my door (besides my niece and nephew) were JW's, I politely listened to their pitch then told them my next door neighbors were JW's pay them a visit. LOL
rdharma
(6,057 posts)Y'all need to grow a set! Without a gun...... you cowards!
ileus
(15,396 posts)Remember always choose the most efficient means of response when attacked. Physical altercations was for high school and college kids, I have a family to protect and provide for. Why risk death when it's not necessary, it's not a competition where your opponent has been matched to your classification...it's a chance we don't have to take.
Safety first, and carry on.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)Pathetic!
Land of the free.... home of the doughy pantloads?
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,482 posts)I do enjoy irony.
Have a nice night.