Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 04:15 PM Mar 2013

Police Can Confiscate ‘Public Nuisance’ High-Capacity Ammo Clips

LOS ANGELES (CBSLA.com) — A draft ordinance proposed by the Los Angeles City Attorney’s office would declare large-capacity ammunition magazines a “public nuisance” and authorize police to confiscate and destroy them.

In a report delivered to the City Clerk’s office, the proposed municipal ordinance would provide for high-capacity ammunition clips of more than 10 rounds to be taken off the streets by law enforcement, confiscated and destroyed as a public nuisance that threatens the public health, safety and welfare.

Trutanich filed the ordinance in response to a motion by City Councilmember Paul Krekorian and at the request of the City Council’s Public Safety Committee on Feb. 22 to draft a municipal law that would authorize a ban on large-capacity magazine clips.

Under California law, the manufacture, sale or exchange of large-capacity ammunition magazines of more than 10 rounds is prohibited.

http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2013/03/05/report-police-can-confiscate-high-capacity-ammo-clips-as-public-nuisance/
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Police Can Confiscate ‘Public Nuisance’ High-Capacity Ammo Clips (Original Post) SecularMotion Mar 2013 OP
Good Politicalboi Mar 2013 #1
It'll be fun to hear them explain kudzu22 Mar 2013 #2
Personal property... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2013 #4
If you don't know. 30 is a larger number than 10 upaloopa Mar 2013 #6
but 30 is not greater than 30 kudzu22 Mar 2013 #10
1.8 seconds to change a magazine razee Mar 2013 #12
agree. youtube speed reload. Prog_gun_owner Mar 2013 #16
Newsflash sylvi Mar 2013 #13
The fact that the Sandy Hook Jenoch Mar 2013 #17
In real life it is called sarisataka Mar 2013 #19
Cho at Virginia Tech reloaded at least 11 times. AtheistCrusader Mar 2013 #20
Ok, now I'm curious. Jenoch Mar 2013 #21
Austrian EKO Cobra anti-terrorist unit gejohnston Mar 2013 #22
And it's used in the glock 18, which is a fully-automatic machine pistol. AtheistCrusader Mar 2013 #23
I am certain they will stop by their own armories SQUEE Mar 2013 #3
Police can and will do whatever they want. After the fact, the public gets it day in court. Tuesday Afternoon Mar 2013 #5
Not bad, three Amendments sarisataka Mar 2013 #7
Not sure what the purpose of the law is Animal Chin Mar 2013 #8
ah, perhaps this is to get those that are "grandfathered" in? Animal Chin Mar 2013 #9
Existing magazines are grandfathered ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2013 #15
It's an interesting law. Jenoch Mar 2013 #11
The people shouldn't stand for this...fire and replace with 2A progressives. ileus Mar 2013 #14
They should be required to wear brown shirts while doing so. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2013 #18

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
4. Personal property...
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 05:15 PM
Mar 2013

...maintained and secured in the home or vehicle would fail the test for public nuisance. The OP, however, may pass that test, as would the actions to which it refers.

To be a public nuisance, an item would have to actually be present in public.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
6. If you don't know. 30 is a larger number than 10
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 05:18 PM
Mar 2013

To fire 30 rounds with a 10 round magazine requires 3 magazines. You have to carry 3 loaded magazines and reload twice. It takes longer and there is an interval of time were there is no shooting going on. Thus there is a better chance of victims not getting shot.
You don't get that with a 30 round magazine.
Get it?
Of course you do. Your problem stems from having a gun fetish. In case you're not here already. Don't come to CA packing because we're ahead of the curve on just about everything including gun laws which I'm sure you like to call draconian. Well we like it that way.

kudzu22

(1,273 posts)
10. but 30 is not greater than 30
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 06:40 PM
Mar 2013

It's hard to explain how one is a nuisance and one is not. 30 rounds is 30 rounds. Public nuisance usually refers to garbage-filled lots and/or smelly or unsightly property. Not something you can't see or smell. They're just trying to commit robbery under color of law. They need to get over their fear and start dealing with the problem rationally.

razee

(23 posts)
12. 1.8 seconds to change a magazine
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 07:51 PM
Mar 2013

You have the delusion of being ahead of the curve. I'm sure it makes you feel all warm and fuzzy like you've really accomplished something important.

[link:

|
 

Prog_gun_owner

(54 posts)
16. agree. youtube speed reload.
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 09:22 PM
Mar 2013

Most semi auto weapon can be speed reloaded, and even some revolvers.

Aside from that, the only thing that a law like this assures is that any law abiding citizen will need to reload every 10 rounds wile the crook...

Personally I feel that 10 round clips are enough, because they are fast enough to change out. I also don't think that some one in a fire fight with a single 30 round clip has a significant advantage over some one with 3 10 round clips.

The reality is however that the citizens will always be out gunned by the government, and most likely the criminals as well. I don't think average citizens will be able to have full autos any time soon.

I also think that pending much training and a psych evaluation/background check that a citizen should be able to own a full auto. But if they act stupid with it, they should have all weapons confiscated.

 

sylvi

(813 posts)
13. Newsflash
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 08:36 PM
Mar 2013

In mass shootings using a "high capacity magazine" there is also "an interval of time were there is no shooting going on" as the perpetrator moves from one room or area to another, searches for specific victims, clears jams caused by those same types of magazines, assesses their situation, etc. They don't often just walk in the door pulling the trigger non-stop until they're out of ammo. That's why mag capacity plays a negligible role in how many people one can kill in such a scenario. When they have a pretty much captive group of defenseless people in their clutches there's always a few seconds available for the nutjob to change magazines. They have no need to hurry. The Sandy Hill shooter changed magazines several times before each one was empty.

The usefulness of a high-cap mag comes into play in a firefight situation to give one parity or superiority against an armed opponent(s). That's why they are sought after in home defense weapons.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
17. The fact that the Sandy Hook
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 10:00 PM
Mar 2013

mental case changed magazines several times when they were half-full shows the influence of the violent video games he was playing. It's my understanding that in the video games there is unlimited ammo and a player does not want to run out of ammo at the wrong time of the 'game'.

sarisataka

(18,674 posts)
19. In real life it is called
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 10:26 PM
Mar 2013

a tactical reload. The school of thought is that in a gunfight, a person cannot keep an accurate count of how many rounds they have fired. To avoid the embarrassment of trying to fire a gun that is empty, shooters are taught to replace a partially used magazine with a full one when they have a momentary respite.

A separate school of thought is that under stress it is too much to swap magazines and retain the partial. To drop it is throwing away ammo that may be desperately needed later so instead train to rapidly change magazines when they have run dry.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
20. Cho at Virginia Tech reloaded at least 11 times.
Thu Mar 7, 2013, 10:40 PM
Mar 2013

They probably only stopped Loughner in AZ because his glock 18 magazine jammed, which is to be expected, and explains why there is only one military on the planet that will use that mag at all, and even then, only for one particular purpose.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
21. Ok, now I'm curious.
Fri Mar 8, 2013, 12:20 AM
Mar 2013

What military uses that magazine and for what purpose?

I think it bears repeating that Loughner, Cho, and the Sandy Hook and Aurora shooter all showed significant signs of mental illness. If their families had been more vigilant and aware maybe some of the carnage would never have occurred.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
22. Austrian EKO Cobra anti-terrorist unit
Fri Mar 8, 2013, 12:52 AM
Mar 2013

They use it in the Glock model 18, which is a full auto version of the 17, with a shoulder stock

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
23. And it's used in the glock 18, which is a fully-automatic machine pistol.
Fri Mar 8, 2013, 02:22 AM
Mar 2013

They don't really intend to reload it. There are a variety of sub-machine-guns that work well for this purpose, but are a bit bigger/weigh more.

Americans basically buy this magazine for convenience. Reload less at the range.
But it's not mechanically very reliable. Especially when you compare it to the glock pistol itself.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
5. Police can and will do whatever they want. After the fact, the public gets it day in court.
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 05:17 PM
Mar 2013

The poor get justice and vengeance and the rich get mercy. It was ever thus and so shall it remain, status quo.

sarisataka

(18,674 posts)
7. Not bad, three Amendments
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 06:17 PM
Mar 2013

erased all in one bill. I suppose the police can just pick the magazines up with your electronic devices if you are within 100 miles of the border.

Now if we can just get a proposal to ban criticism of public officials and require a permit for gatherings of three or more people we will really be making progress

Animal Chin

(175 posts)
8. Not sure what the purpose of the law is
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 06:19 PM
Mar 2013

Can't they already confiscate any they find since 10+ capacity mags are already illegal in California?

Animal Chin

(175 posts)
9. ah, perhaps this is to get those that are "grandfathered" in?
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 06:21 PM
Mar 2013

Just saw that the CA prohibition is against "manufacture, sale, transfer."

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
11. It's an interesting law.
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 07:07 PM
Mar 2013

A similar local ordinance would be illegal in Minnesota since local gun laws cannot be more strict than state gun laws.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
14. The people shouldn't stand for this...fire and replace with 2A progressives.
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 08:37 PM
Mar 2013

The people of CA should have never let it come to this. Lost rights are hard to reclaim...This is the battle we all must fight.


 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
18. They should be required to wear brown shirts while doing so.
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 10:23 PM
Mar 2013

Trutanich is a vote-pandering, totalitarian shitheel.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Police Can Confiscate ‘Pu...