Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tenorly

(2,037 posts)
Sun Mar 5, 2017, 11:38 PM Mar 2017

Debate erupts in Uruguay after court ruling blocks woman's abortion at ex-boyfriend's request

Public debate in Uruguay centered around the divisive issue of abortion this week following a court ruling that blocked a woman from terminating her pregnancy after her former partner appealed to the courts to block the procedure.

According to local news reports, the unnamed 24-year-old woman was ordered last week not to carry out the procedure because the father, her former boyfriend, wants to keep the baby and raise it on his own. The mother, however, said this week that she is suffering from a medical condition that may prevent her from bringing the baby to term.

Uruguayan law gives her until the 12th week of pregnancy to obtain the procedure.

Judge Pura Concepción Book, of the western city of Mercedes, ruled that the abortion contravened rights under international child-protection treaties and the Uruguayan Constitution, as well as infringing on the rights of the father. Judge Book also concluded that the woman had not “respected” the terms of the 2012 law that legalized abortion.

The Legal Abortion in Uruguay group issued a statement calling the order “abhorrent” and arguing that such decisions should be made by the woman in question alone. The country’s Constitution, they pointed out, extends no protection to unborn children.

“I feel violated, insulted,” the woman told the Montevideo news daily El País. “It’s like nobody cares about your life, your decision, what happens to you, what you feel, your condition, and you have to see from the outside how other people, who only care to make a profit, make a decision about your life,” she added, noting that her relationship with the man requesting the injunction was casual and that “at no time” had they ever discussed becoming parents.

Her ex-boyfriend said that whatever the outcome of the case, he intends to take the case to the nation’s Constitutional Court to obtain a ruling on whether fathers have rights over an unborn child.

Uruguay is the only country in South America where abortion is legal. There were 9,362 registered abortions there in 2015, compared to around 48,000 live births.

Abortion was legalized by President José “Pepe” Mujica after it passed Congress by a razor-thin margin in 2012.

At: http://www.buenosairesherald.com/article/224866/abortion-debate-erupts-in-uruguay-after-controversial-court-ruling

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

littlemissmartypants

(22,722 posts)
1. The pussy grabbers, they're everywhere.
Mon Mar 6, 2017, 01:24 AM
Mar 2017

I hope you will keep us updated on this.

Thank you for the post tenorly.

tenorly

(2,037 posts)
2. You're welcome.
Mon Mar 6, 2017, 02:10 AM
Mar 2017

Progress as far as abortion rights (and so many other issues) has always had the same stumbling blocks in Latin America: the elites, who often have a very 'Trumpian' sense of entitlement (i.e. chastity for thee, not for me); and the Catholic Church - particularly its fascist wing, the Opus Dei (who were behind the region's dictatorships in the '70s and still wield a lot of power there).

Uruguay, and to a lesser extent Argentina, are probably the furthest ahead in terms of women's rights - but even there the hard-fought gains are always under threat.

niyad

(113,498 posts)
3. then that bastard damned well better sign a legally-binding document that will pay ALL her medical
Thu Mar 9, 2017, 03:06 PM
Mar 2017

and living expenses during her pregnancy, and for the three years after it takes for her body to recover. AND that document must also include a provision that he will NEVER ask her for a dime, AND he will have a vasectomy so that he can never put another woman in this position.

oh, and if this woman dies as a result of the forced pregnancy, HE has to pay the funeral and all related expenses.

tenorly

(2,037 posts)
4. Hear, hear. Deadbeat fathers have long been a serious problem in Latin America (and elsewhere)
Thu Mar 9, 2017, 06:05 PM
Mar 2017

Over the last 30 years or so, a number of countries in the region have attempted to tackle this problem by passing Patria Potestas laws - which govern the rights and, above all, responsibilities of the father.

One group has always opposed these reforms though: right-wing Catholics, particularly the Opus Dei.

The problem there is that a disproportionate number of judges in the region are, in fact, right-wing Catholics. And as you can imagine, they seldom miss an opportunity to chip away at these reforms in whatever way they can. I think it's safe to say that this judge falls in that category.

Her name, by the way, means 'pure conception' in Spanish - proof if nothing else that God does indeed have a sense of humor.

[center]

Judge Pura Concepción Book[/center]

niyad

(113,498 posts)
5. dear goddess, I missed the fact that it was a woman judge. Hates her gender, loves her church.
Fri Mar 10, 2017, 01:04 PM
Mar 2017

tenorly

(2,037 posts)
6. They're a lot like so many right-wing women here in the US, sadly.
Fri Mar 10, 2017, 01:45 PM
Mar 2017

[center]

“Men should stop treating feminists like ladies, and instead treat them like the men they say they want to be.” — Phyllis Schlafly[/center]

tenorly

(2,037 posts)
8. Same here.
Fri Mar 10, 2017, 01:54 PM
Mar 2017

What do you think it was with her? Mommy issues?

With the possible exception of Ann Coulter, I've never seen so much bitter resentment of other women.

niyad

(113,498 posts)
9. kellyanne comes to mind as well. I wish I knew because she did an incredible amount
Fri Mar 10, 2017, 01:57 PM
Mar 2017

of damage in her misbegotten life.

tenorly

(2,037 posts)
10. My guess in her case is that she's an opportunist first and foremost.
Fri Mar 10, 2017, 02:09 PM
Mar 2017

Willing to say anything that endears her to the knuckle draggers.

I first recall seeing her on tv during the Clinton impeachment circus. That was her (only) talent: talking over people. She was very good at speed arguing, and wouldn't let anyone get a word in edgewise.

She must be very worried for herself right now though. Trump will end up in jail, and he's taking a lot of flunkies with him.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Pro-Choice»Debate erupts in Uruguay ...