Revision of gmo health threat news.

[Mr.Pain]

First of all I would like to express my apologies to the group for failing to adhere to policies in my first post. I am new at this is my only excuse, it will not happen again. Below is the important part of the the the copyrighted material from RT.com.

A leaked study examining genetically-modified corn reveals that the lab-made alternative to organic crops contains a startling level of toxic chemicals.

An anti-GMO website has posted the results of an education-based consulting company’s comparison of corn types, and the results reveal that genetically modified foods may be more hazardous than once thought.
According to the analysis, GMO corn tested by Profit Pro contains a number of elements absent from traditional cord, including chlorides, formaldehyde and glyphosate. While those elements don’t appear naturally in corn, they were present in GMO samples to the tune of 60 ppm, 200pm and 13 ppm, respectively.

For the entire news story please visit http://rt.com/usa/toxic-study-gmo-corn-900/

Formaldehyde has been linked to various cancers by the Centers for Disease Control.

http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/substances/toxsubstance.asp?toxid=39

[MineralMan]

1. Thanks for revising your post.

Well done.

[physicspolice]

2. Don't be been fooled by false advertising!

The "leaked study" from Profit Pro is actually JUST AN AD to sell fertilizer, and a pitiful scientific fraud! The data is from a soil report, and has nothing to do with nutrition. The data is also *clearly* (poorly) falsified. For example, numbers that should add up to 100%, do not. There are quantities for which there exists no scientific method to measure, like "Anaerobic Biology" in parts per million. It's a hoax.

Read my detailed analysis here http://thephysicspolice.blogspot.com/2013/04/dont-eat-soil.html

[Mr.Pain]

3. Interesting read.

I am not a chemist. I have to admit that, like most Americans, I have to rely on reports from what I would hope to be skilled researchers in responsible independent labs. Companies like Monsanto and Con Agra have what seems to be the ability to mute any independent research that is being done, if any. For the most part I have grown in my own fields what my family consumes, and one thing that I have found to be true is... it tastes better

[Mr.Pain]

4. However I also found this...

http://www.profitproag.com/ProfitProGMODisclaimer.htm

[physicspolice]

5. ProfitPro mislead by outsourcing

They have clearly been mislead by the "independent, outsourced, major food company" who gave them this bogus report.

No corn could have less than 3% organic matter only 60 ppm Carbon, but dirt can. Not to mention Cation Exchange Capacity, ERGS, Brix, pH, Base Saturation, and ratio of aerobic to anaerobic organisms are all tests performed on soil.

[proverbialwisdom]

6. Here's a phenomenal resource for vetted news on gmos: http://gmwatch.org

http://gmwatch.org/index.php?option=com_dategroup
Enter month and year

Dorky looking website, but so terrific it incited hack attacks and more.

HOMEPAGE: Welcome to the Internet Wars

This site replaces the one forced off the web by 14 months of cyber attacks. Our last site was also downed by legal threats. Read our back story and about our battle to cut through the web of deceit over GM crops. Keep up to date with all the latest news via our daily, weekly or monthly email bulletins. And don't forget to check out our sister site - GMWatch SpinProfiles, and the banGMfood campaign. You can also find us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.

Check it out!