Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Mon Aug 20, 2012, 06:53 AM Aug 2012

Cancer in over 65s predicted 'to explode {uk}

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-19316754


By 2040, quarter of over 65s could be diagnosed with cancer.


Cancer will become a fact of life for many people over the age of 65, according to researchers and a cancer charity.

They say the number of elderly people who have been diagnosed with the disease will more than treble by 2040, with over one in four being affected.

In 2010, 1.3 million over 65s had cancer. The figure is predicted to reach 4.1m within 30 years.

Macmillan Cancer Support said it was a ticking time bomb for society.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cancer in over 65s predicted 'to explode {uk} (Original Post) xchrom Aug 2012 OP
Cancer rates set to treble? And what, pray tell, is the mechanism? Warpy Aug 2012 #1
I think it's environmental factors flamingdem Aug 2012 #2
Radiation causes a perceptible spike in cancer cases Warpy Aug 2012 #3
It's also a simple fact that SheilaT Aug 2012 #4

Warpy

(111,282 posts)
1. Cancer rates set to treble? And what, pray tell, is the mechanism?
Mon Aug 20, 2012, 09:56 AM
Aug 2012

People are living longer right now. Why should people aging at the same rate suddenly see a spike in cancer rates because they're living as long?

It sounds like Macmillan is looking for funding.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
2. I think it's environmental factors
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 01:35 PM
Aug 2012

Breast cancer numbers have soared for example and those tissues are very sensitive.

Also living longer. Who knows what else, maybe things we just don't know yet.

Then there's nuke crap floating around that doesn't help.

Warpy

(111,282 posts)
3. Radiation causes a perceptible spike in cancer cases
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 02:30 PM
Aug 2012

but it's dosage related and certainly doesn't account for a trebling. The spike in breast cancer rates is largely attributable to HRT and are now declining as the use of HRT declines.

Environmental factors are going to be balanced by lower smoking rates.

I think this person is sensing his own mortality and projecting it onto a large population and that is always a mistake. He has grossly overstated any increase in cancer cases to grab a headline.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
4. It's also a simple fact that
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 02:36 PM
Aug 2012

many cancers take many, many years to happen. The longer an individual lives, the more likely the occurrence of a cancer in that individual. If we're no longer dying from TB or diphtheria or small pox or pneumonia or any of the other diseases that used to kill us off in great numbers, we have a good likelihood of living long enough. To get cancer.

We all die of something.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»Cancer in over 65s predic...