Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(131,077 posts)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 07:09 PM Apr 2017

Good News for the Older Mothers

(Good news for me and MY daughters, but not so good for them and THEIR kids!)

'The first time I got pregnant, I was a comparatively young mother, for my demographic: I was 25, in medical school, surrounded by classmates who, for the most part, were not reproducing yet. By the third pregnancy, 11 years later, I was over 35, which classified me, in the obstetric terminology I had learned in medical school, as an “elderly multigravida,” that is, someone who was having a child but not her first child, after 35. (If it was your first child, you were an “elderly primigravida,” or “elderly primip” for short — even as a medical student, I had a strong sense that no woman had invented this terminology.)

So by certain standards, I have experience as both a somewhat younger mother and a somewhat older mother, though not at the extremes in either direction.

National Vital Statistics Reports data released in January showed that in the United States, birthrates shifted in 2015: The birthrate for teenagers dropped to 22.3 births per 1,000 females ages 15 to 19 that year, a record low for the nation. And for women 30 through 44, the birthrates were the highest they have been since the baby boom era of the 1960s.

And as birthrates shift toward somewhat older mothers, researchers continue to look at what that says, both about who is getting pregnant when, and how that is associated with how their children do, especially when it comes to cognitive outcomes. (There’s also been some interesting research recently on paternal age, but these studies focused on the mothers.)'>>>

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/03/well/family/good-news-for-the-older-mothers.html?

I told my ob to NOT refer to me as 'elderly' ANYTHING! I would be 40 2 weeks after my first daughter was born! “advanced maternal age” (well, it beats “elderly”) sure does!

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Good News for the Older Mothers (Original Post) elleng Apr 2017 OP
I was 34 and then 38 when I had my kids. PoindexterOglethorpe Apr 2017 #1
I was 29 and 33 Freddie Apr 2017 #2

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,893 posts)
1. I was 34 and then 38 when I had my kids.
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 07:17 PM
Apr 2017

One real advantage to being a bit older is that you know who you are, and maybe (this was the case with me) have had a life of your own for a number of years before having children.

And I think that in my thirties I had more stamina than many in their twenties, which is purely anecdotal, I know.

Freddie

(9,273 posts)
2. I was 29 and 33
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 08:13 PM
Apr 2017

When I had my kids (1986 and 1990) which I think made me very average for the time.
My daughter, now 30, was 24 and 28 when she had her kids as she didn't want to be an "old mom" like I was!

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»Good News for the Older M...