Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(113,498 posts)
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 10:21 PM Feb 2015

Patricia Arquette is Right: We Need an ERA

Patricia Arquette is Right: We Need an ERA




At Sunday night’s Academy Awards, Oscar winner Patricia Arquette used her moment at the podium to speak out for women’s equality. Accepting the award for Best Supporting Actress for her role in Boyhood, Arquette said,
To every woman who gave birth to every citizen and taxpayer of this nation, we have fought for everybody else’s equal rights. It’s our time to have wage equality once and for all, and equal rights for women in the United States of America.

Backstage, Arquette elaborated on her plea:
It is time for women. Equal means equal. It’s inexcusable that we go around the world and we talk about equal rights for women in other countries and we don’t … have equal rights for women in America. … People think we have equal rights; we won’t until we pass … the [Equal Rights Amendment] once and for all.
. . . . .




But Arquette is certainly right: What American women—of every race, class and sexual orientation—need now is Constitutionally enshrined equality, and that means an Equal Rights Amendment. The ERA was first introduced in Congress in 1972 and was approved by the House and Senate. But because Constitutional amendments require ratification by 38 states—and the ERA fell short by three—the amendment never became part of the Constitution. Now, Rep. Jackie Speier (D.-Calif) and Sen. Benjamin Cardin (D-Md.) have proposed resolutions that would remove the ratification deadline, creating an opportunity for three more states to ratify the ERA and reach the 38-state threshold. Also, Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) have authored bills that mirror the language of the original ERA. Theirs would require Congress to pass the ERA again and send it to the states for ratification (in other words, start the process over).

Feminists support both proposals—how we get the ERA doesn’t matter, but enshrining gender equality in the Constitution does. It’s the beginning of a strategy to untangle the intersectional web of oppression that ensnares so many Americans. Equal pay doesn’t just affect the upper echelons of Hollywood—low-wage workers, disproportionately women of color, deserve fair wages.

http://msmagazine.com/blog/2015/02/23/patricia-arquette-is-right-we-need-an-era/

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Patricia Arquette is Right: We Need an ERA (Original Post) niyad Feb 2015 OP
So disappointing that we still have not passed the ERA. Dark n Stormy Knight Feb 2015 #1
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Women's Rights & Issues»Patricia Arquette is Righ...