Women's Rights & Issues
Related: About this forumAnyone else kind of stoked about the election results?
I am. I think President Obama has been excellent on women's issues (equal pay, contraceptives, abortion rights, etc.) and the alternative would have, frankly, sucked. I'm still smiling.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)add immigration reform/amnesty citizenship
100% Gay marriage rights
etc.
Kath1
(4,309 posts)We just passed the marriage equality initiative here in Maryland. And voted in the DREAM act. The country is transforming for the better.
Freddie
(9,273 posts)And the idiot Repugs think that "if only Akin and Mourdock wouldn't have made those comments about rape" they win this issue. WRONG. It's not the comments, it's the policies behind them.
Kath1
(4,309 posts)That message was sent loud and clear. The war on women is real and American voters fought back on November 6.
Freddie
(9,273 posts)("Thoughtful conservative"--there's an oxymoron!) have actually suggested that the Repug Party give up the fight against women's and LGBT rights if they want a future. Then there's Bobby Jindal whose wise advise is to change the "tone" of the message but not the message itself.
What they're all forgetting is that we voted against their economic policies as well, which are just as wrong as their social ones.
It is not just about women's rights. Trickle down economics and tax breaks for the wealthy don't benefit the majority of women, or anyone else for that matter. I'm borrowing one of my daughter's favorite terms about Republicans here - their whole agenda "sucks."
niyad
(113,543 posts)clear that the woman-haters did NOT get the message (witness ohio). The only difference between akin, mourdock and some of the other thugs is that they were very clear, and very vocal. We won a skirmish in the war against women, we have not, as yet, won the war.