Kansas Judge Rules Sperm Donor Not on Hook for Child Support

[Eugene]

Source: Associated Press

Kansas Judge Rules Sperm Donor Not on Hook for Child Support

By JOHN HANNA, ASSOCIATED PRESS TOPEKA, Kan. — Nov 29, 2016, 6:13 PM ET

A Topeka man who answered a Craigslist ad to donate sperm so two women could have a baby together is not legally the child's father and isn't required to provide financial support, a Kansas judge has ruled.

The state Department for Children and Families had not decided as of Tuesday whether it would appeal last week's ruling by Shawnee County District Judge Mary Mattivi. The department sought to force William Marotta to pay child support for the girl born in December 2009.

Mattivi last year required Marotta to submit a DNA sample to confirm that he was the girl's biological father and declared he was not "a mere donor of sperm." But the judge's Nov. 22 ruling concluded that birth mother's former partner should be considered the child's second parent rather than Marotta, in part because he has had minimal contact with the girl.

The department filed a petition in 2012 to have Marotta declared the child's legal father and require him to pay child support after the women, birth mother Jennifer Schreiner and Angela Bauer, separated and Schreiner received assistance from the state. The department initially sought to reclaim about almost $6,100 in expenses associated with the child's birth.

The case illustrated how older laws on assisted reproduction in Kansas and others have not been updated. Charles Baylor, Marotta's attorney, said the Kansas agency's position was "radical" and discriminated against same-sex couples.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]

Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/kansas-judge-rules-sperm-donor-hook-child-support-43854835

[burrowowl]

1. Yes her partner should be

giving child support.

[Bohunk68]

2. Accessing the services of a sperm bank is only for the

production of a child for the benefit of the parents who would not otherwise be able to do so. The persons that should be liable for the upkeep and expenses should be on the backs of the parents listed on the Birth Certificate. The judge handed down a measured decision.