LGBT
Related: About this forumFearless
(18,421 posts)William769
(55,147 posts)Raster
(20,998 posts)"My husband, Martin Luther King Jr., once said, We are all tied together in a single garment of destiny
an inescapable network of mutuality,
I can never be what I ought to be until you are allowed to be what you ought to be. Therefore, I appeal to everyone who believes in Martin Luther King Jr.s dream to make room at the table of brotherhood and sisterhood for lesbian and gay people.
Gays and lesbians stood up for civil rights in Montgomery, Selma, in Albany, Ga. and St. Augustine, Fla., and many other campaigns of the Civil Rights Movement. Many of these courageous men and women were fighting for my freedom at a time when they could find few voices for their own, and I salute their contributions.
Coretta Scott King, speaking at the National Gay and Lesbian Task Forces Creating Change Conference on November 9, 2000.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)So could rap music stop with the B-Word now?
Just sayin'.
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)Have any evidence that he does? Does he pay women who work for him less then men? Has he not made a load of money for women in the music business? I'm not a fan of his or anything, but if you have evidence that he discriminates against women, please provide it.
If you're a professional musician or music critic, I guess I'd respect your opinion of his artistic work, but otherwise I don't see how it's relevant.
wickerwoman
(5,662 posts)If he wrote a song using the word "fag" in a negative way but then had a gay accountant he paid well, would that mean he doesn't discriminate against gay people? He's probably made a lot of money for Jewish people in the music business, but if he wrote a song about "kikes" I'm not sure you could argue that he doesn't really discriminate against them. It's the old "some of my best friends are black" bullshit to say it's fine to call women bitches or hos as long as you pay them the same as men or otherwise make them rich.
SemperEadem
(8,053 posts)can you name the albums and songs on which he's done that?
whathehell
(29,090 posts)SemperEadem
(8,053 posts)Last edited Sat Oct 6, 2012, 02:13 AM - Edit history (1)
and he wasn't the one making the assertions.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)wickerwoman
(5,662 posts)I was responding to harmonican's argument that as long as you pay people well and make them rich, then it's fine to say whatever you want about them. My point is that you can't use disrespectful, discriminatory language about a group of people but then claim that you don't discriminate because you "have a black friend".
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)Just because James Cameron makes a movie about a boat that sinks doesn't mean that he hates boats.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)For one thing, women aren't "sinking ships" and just
because you "use" women and pay them as required by law,
it doesn't mean you do NOT hate them. White filmmakers from
the thirties and forties made "steppin' Fetchit" movies and paid the black actors in them.
Hell, plenty of fillmakers made movies about "fags" and played gays for laughs.
Does that mean they LIKED those Gays and Blacks and considered them equals?
Maybe you're getting the point right about now.
.
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)I'm able to make a distinction between a person and their artistic production.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)production....Should a straight person call a gay man "faggot" in HIS or HER
"artistic production". Inquiring minds want to know.
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)If someone writes a work of fiction told in the first person, and the narrator refers to someone as some sort of slur, it's not the same as if the author referring to someone as a slur.
So, if it's an artistic production delivered vocally, it can be absolutely ok for someone to say any vile language. Saying and calling are different words with different meanings. For instance, I'm insightful enough to know that Elijah Wood is not a hobbit on a quest to destroy the dark lord Sauron.
Oh, never mind. Lets just go with your plan and ban Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn.
wickerwoman
(5,662 posts)When he calls Jim a nigger, the audience knows that the author is making a point that racism can involve a disconnect between a person you see as a friend and a stereotype pushed by society and that he is stressing the absurdity of using such despicable language to describe a good friend and companion.
This is not the case with 99% of rap songs that call women bitches and hos. They aren't secretly inviting the listener to see what a sexist ass the singer is. Yes, it's a persona. But it's not a persona that invites critique or makes any broader point about sexism or the status of women in society. Almost all of it is straight-up objectification. Women are a status symbol who show how dominant the singer is.
Pretty sure Mark Twain is spinning like a shish kebab at the comparison.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)but VERY few here are willing to acknowledge it, let alone "confront" it.
Thanks for being one of the gutsy ones.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)he's about as non-discriminatory as a white guy singing about "niggers".
That's all. .
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)white people should eliminate that word from their artistic practice?
Are there certain words which are forbidden from all art, or just from art made by certain people?
I bet there are lots of art schools who could use your insight. You could have a class where students come in, sit down, you give them a once-over and tell them based on race and gender what sounds, text, material, and imagery they are not allowed to use in their work. Clearly, it would be easy for you to teach, and it would presumably be a pretty easy A for the students, because they would just have to satisfy your terms of censorship.
If only I'd had courses that easy when I was studying art and music.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)If you answer "yes" to either of those questions, you've got your answer.
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)Artistic practice should never be censored.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)has the guts to do EITHER of the things I've mentioned,
we'll get back with you, but I wouldn't hold my breath,
and until then, I call bullshit.
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)That's why it's a good thing that we have freedom of speech.
A lot of really great art would never have been made if we didn't. Some people may not like that art, and that's fine. There's lots of art that I don't care for - I assume a vast majority - but there is no art that I think should be censored.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)as a white male who, straight or not, can probably pass as such,
you have no "skin in the game"
Again -- bag the non-existent "censorship" issue, or I'll have to remind you that the DU Rules
demand "censorship" too. There are WORDS you cannot say here, and
you've obviously colluded with this "censorship" or you would have been TOS'd
long ago.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)and find out how FAST you get thrown off the board, and while you're at it,
research the term "censorship". You'll find it's done by GOVERNMENT,
not by individuals or non-government groups.
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)I know enough about it to just dislike things instead of suggesting that they shouldn't be produced.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)As to just "disliking" things, yes, that's fine when those "things" aren't being aimed at YOU.
Have you ever been personally harassed or insulted?...Did you simply "dislike" it, or did you "suggest"
that the insulter stop "producing" the insults?
whathehell
(29,090 posts)since you are not the ones who suffer being demeaned for a condition of birth, are you?
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)Did you think three poor arguments would somehow make up for one good one? Quantity over quality?
whathehell
(29,090 posts)I wanted to, as three good arguments are even better than one.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)hank senior is responsible for all of country music
whathehell
(29,090 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)it's one thing if you had phrased it towards him, but you didn't.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)If you are, the poster downthread disagrees.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)that he is not responsible for
whathehell
(29,090 posts)and my assumption just happened to be confirmed on this thread.
If you don't "approve" of what I did, I'm afraid you'll just have to recall that "ignore" is your friend.
Enjoy your day.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)other people responsible for other "genre's"
whathehell
(29,090 posts)in some of that genre's uglier elements, and a poster down thread confirmed my fears.
That being the case, I'd respect your sense of priorities more if you'd express as much "concern"
about the routine slurring of women in rap, as you do the "reputation" of a rich celebrity you know little about.
Until that happens, we have nothing more to discuss.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)responsibility for their whole group, while majorities are not.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)and TREATED as a minority, while those who should know better act like
that's "okay".
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)whathehell
(29,090 posts)William769
(55,147 posts)This thread is about marriage equality. Nothing more nothing less. If you have a problem with Jay-Z & women fine, but this isn't the place to discuss it. There are several other Groups that your topic would be better suited. You can even start a thread in the LGBT Group if you so desire.
But don't you dare come in here and piss on a Marriage equality thread with all the shit we have had to endure and are still enduring for equality. You'll find yourself tossed out of here so damn fast it will make your head spin!
And I am writing this post as one of the LGBT Hosts.
If you don't like my attitude, I suggest you contact another LGBT Host.
I hope I have made myself clear here.
Vanje
(9,766 posts)My very exact sentiments.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)I'm sure this is ALL my fault, as I was silly enough to imagine
that the gay community was, um, half female, but since
you are unaware that women -- straight AND gay -- have endured,
and CONTINUE to endure, at least as much shit as gay men,
feel free to continue in ignorance and self-importance and
THROW ME OUT -- It will be a fucking HONOR!
I do hope I've made MYSELF clear.
William769
(55,147 posts)Have a nice day.
pinto
(106,886 posts)Automated Message: Blocked member notification
Mail Message
This message is to inform you that whathehell has been blocked from posting in the LGBT group by William769. If you believe this is an error, you may contact William769 for more information. You have received this message because you are currently a Host of the LGBT group.
HillWilliam
(3,310 posts)This thread was needlessly derailed by continuous off-topic posts. The poster was invited to start a new thread and chose not to.
Vanje
(9,766 posts)Cha
(297,573 posts)for those Facts. Dicrimination is Discrimination...against anyone.
Skittles
(153,185 posts)he is awesome
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)simply another term for a woman.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)acceptable bigotry of the Left".
NCLefty
(3,678 posts)Vanje
(9,766 posts)ForgoTheConsequence
(4,869 posts)He freely uses the word faggot in his songs. When he apologizes I'll take him seriously.
Too many faggot niggas clocking my spending/Exercising your gay-like minds like Richard Simmons
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,869 posts) cause faggots hate when you getting money like athletes
It goes on. Apologize for your homophobic lyrics and give up some of the money you've made putting down gays and maybe I'll care what you have to say.