Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 07:26 AM Oct 2012

MASS. APPEALS INMATE SEX CHANGE SURGERY RULING

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_INMATE_SEX_CHANGE?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-10-03-07-13-35

BOSTON (AP) -- Massachusetts has filed an appeal of a judge's decision to grant a convicted murderer's request for a taxpayer-funded sex reassignment surgery.

The Boston Globe reports that in papers filed Tuesday, lawyers for the state Department of Correction's commissioner asked for a stay of the order granting a sex change for Michelle Kosilek, until a federal appeals court can rule.

The state says it believes the medical care the 63-year-old Kosilek is receiving is adequate and that the court didn't address what it says are legitimate safety concerns of protecting her in prison.

U.S. District Judge Mark Wolf ruled last month that the surgery is the only adequate treatment for Kosilek's gender-identity disorder.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MASS. APPEALS INMATE SEX CHANGE SURGERY RULING (Original Post) xchrom Oct 2012 OP
If she hadn't killed her wife... One_Life_To_Give Oct 2012 #1
A ward of the state is exactly that....and determining the responsibilities of the state Evasporque Oct 2012 #2

One_Life_To_Give

(6,036 posts)
1. If she hadn't killed her wife...
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 10:20 AM
Oct 2012

I am torn over this and find I want to make distinctions about why Michelle should be excluded. It doesn't seem fair that we have many girls over at Fenway Health and other places specializing in GID. And who do we decide to use public money on? If she wants to come up with her own funds to pay for it, fine. But not while so many much more deserving, law abiding people have to go without.

Evasporque

(2,133 posts)
2. A ward of the state is exactly that....and determining the responsibilities of the state
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 09:27 AM
Oct 2012

is appropriate....what this does is allow the social and individual prejudices to be be removed concerning transsexualism and the courts will judge the situation on the ground of "medical necessity" and not by how much people are bothered by transsexuals. Outside of prison insurance companies, doctors, employers, schools and host of others are free to discriminate against transgender people. The state cannot do that to inmates. So this trial is very important as it will set a precedent on the "medical necessity" of sexual reassignment surgery in the treatment of GID....something that many people have tried to squash by many means....by making the GID a non-diagnosable disorder....by declaring it immoral etc, etc, etc....

A favorable ruling could have a major influence on insurance companies that exclude all treatment of transsexualism....

Countries with socialized medicine cover and provide treatment (Britain, Canada, Denmark....)

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»LGBT»MASS. APPEALS INMATE SEX ...