Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 12:27 PM Jan 2015

Netanyahu defends speech to Congress about threat of Iran nuclear deal

Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu defended on Sunday a planned speech to Congress about Iran, saying he had a moral obligation to take every opportunity to speak out on an issue that poses a mortal threat to his country.

His visit to Washington in March has opened up a political rift in the US and has drawn accusations in Israel that Netanyahu is undermining a strategic alliance in order to win an election due two weeks after the trip.

Briefing his cabinet on the speech to be made on 3 March to a joint session of Congress, Netanyahu said his priority was to urge the US and other powers not to negotiate an Iranian nuclear deal that might endanger Israel.

“In coming weeks, the powers are liable to reach a framework agreement with Iran, an agreement liable to leave Iran as a nuclear threshold state,” he said in remarks carried by Israeli broadcasters.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/25/netanyahu-defends-us-trip-congress-speech-iran

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
1. I feel that Netanyahu believes the only acceptable thing to do to Iran is to bomb/nuke it.
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 12:34 PM
Jan 2015

And he has willing accomplices right here in Congress.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
2. He is nothing if not consistent on this matter
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 12:36 PM
Jan 2015

He has been beating this same drum for years now. Protocol be damned!

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
4. Liar. Even Fox will not rescue you this time. But, to give you the be edit of the doubt, the
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 12:50 PM
Jan 2015

presumption of innocence, I would suggest a thorough investigation of this, let it all come out, the months of negotiations leading to this dump, let it all out and let the facts speak for themselves.

Start with a look at the who, what , when, where and then the why of a clear violation of longstanding protocol, separation of constitutional powers and the role of the Israeli Ambassador.

What is there to hide if this is so above board and desirable?

Maybe Mossad has an opinion in it? That would be part of the investigation.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
6. Ron Dermer is pretty much persona non grata to the WH after this.
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 05:48 PM
Jan 2015

Virtually zero information will be shared with him, or with Bibi, that isn't given as well to Boehner and McConnell.

So long as Bibi is in charge, the inescapable conclusion is that Israel's government is completely untrustworthy.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
8. I was a little surprised he went this far. Not very, but a little.
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 06:41 PM
Jan 2015

I can't remember when things were this testy, not even under Bush the Elder and Baker.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
10. There you go.
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 08:46 PM
Jan 2015

I keep thinking "desperate times call for desperate measures". I think Bibi is getting desperate.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
12. Win by political chicanery, lose by political chicanery.
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 08:52 PM
Jan 2015

A very popular plot here too, but they never seem to learn.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
14. Chicanery doesn't seem to lose elections so much as
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 09:04 PM
Jan 2015

immediate and obvious policy catastrophes. Israel's policies are catastrophic, but are more of a slow burn than wildfire.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
15. I've seen that a couple times now.
Sun Jan 25, 2015, 09:04 PM
Jan 2015

I consider it fearmongering, mostly. Any renewed belligerence against Israel would just give ISIS an opening, and a marketing opportunity, but "reason can only take you so far". They would all do well to deal with ISIS before resuming their own wars. ISIS is a movement, a childrens crusade, but with militarily capable leaders. They are unpredictable, and likely not very well under control either.

Israel Hayom and Ynet and those guys are fulminating like mad, although I haven't been bothering to read them. ISIS is in all sorts of places now, that is somewhat true. My response is "Good Job guys!" You sure prevented terrorism.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Netanyahu defends speech ...