Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forum‘NYT’ gives Israelis the opportunity to shoot and explain (why not Hamas?)
Today the New York Times published a story about the Israeli strike on a United Nations school in Jabaliya, Gaza, that killed 21 last week Questions of Weapons and Warnings in Past Barrage on a Gaza Shelter that suggests that Israel just maybe committed a war crime for failing to discriminate between a military target and civilians.
Inspection of the damage, a preliminary United Nations review that collected 30 pieces of shrapnel, and interviews with two dozen witnesses indicate that the predawn strikes on Wednesday, July 30, that killed 21 people at the school, in the crowded Jabaliya refugee camp, were likely to have come from heavy artillery not designed for precision use.
The front page article today is decent, though way way overdue and of course the Times gives the Israelis plenty of space to reply
In any war, there are malfunctions and mistakes, General [Gadi] Shamni said. Hamas militants usually do things in order to attract Israeli fire, he added, and hope that some mistake will cause a disaster in order to delegitimize Israel.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)voice, no ad money in it.
FBaggins
(26,754 posts)When their rockets kill someone in Israel... they celebrate it. When israelis are kidnapped, they may or may not take credit for it... but again, they make clear that they're pleased that it happened. They don't try to "explain" suicide bombers... they honor them.
They don't attempt to "explain" how rockets end up in schools... or get fired from hospitals (etc etc etc).
So who isn't giving them an "opportunity" to "explain" ?
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)King_David
(14,851 posts)Some people post every single "article "
frylock
(34,825 posts)FBaggins
(26,754 posts)I think you're using wikipedia as an exhaustive list.
Or perhaps you think there's a difference if the explosives are loaded onto a donkey (as occurred last month)... or the bomber escapes and doesn't actually "suicide"? Or suicide bombs used against Israelis outside of Israel... maybe those don't count either?
There was a bus bombed in Tel Aviv about a year and a half ago (11/21/2012) injuring 21 people. Hamas praised the attack... but maybe it doesn't count?
A poll last month in Gaza showed that roughly half the population supported suicide bombings. Do we need to give them a chance to "explain" before we decide that's unacceptable?
frylock
(34,825 posts)what percentage of Israelis support the current campaign that has resulted in nearly 2000 dead civilians?
FBaggins
(26,754 posts)And I'm sure that some small number of them don't even care.
But the bulk of them (unlike so many here in the group) can distinguish between trying to kill civilians (or not even caring)... vs civilians that Hamas put in harm's way intentionally.
Let's take a not-so-hypothetical -
There's a tunnel running from a given apartment building in Gaza that runs into Israel and the IDF decides to take it out. THey warn the neighborhood to flee... then they call the owner and warn him that the building is going to be destroyed... then they drop a couple "knocking" charges onto the roof (that every single Gaza resident knows means "get out of the way...now!"... and then they blow up the building. Question - When we later learn that there were still civilians in the building because Hamas had insisted that they ignore the warnings...
... should we blame the people who obviously went out of their way to avoid the casualties? Or should we blame the "people" (sic) who made them stay - knowing that they would die... all so that they could use their dead bodies as propaganda against the people who wanted them to live?
frylock
(34,825 posts)people on the ground have stated that is not the case. I'm also inclined to take the word of the UN, that states that they had warned the IDF that the school was being used as a shelter, and even provided coordinates prior to it being bombed.
FBaggins
(26,754 posts)It is a reality. There is absolutely no question that Hamas puts palestinians in harm's way intentionally.
I don't call them "human shields" because a human shield is someone that is used to keep the enemy from firing at you. Hamas wants the enemy to fire at them because they want the civilian casualties. Civilian casualties are the only PR tool that Hamas has. They want as many of them as they can get.
frylock
(34,825 posts)because they're stating otherwise.
FBaggins
(26,754 posts)Not these surely?
Reporters from Italy and the US corroborated the IDF's explanation for explosions near Shifa Hospital and by a playground in Shati on Tuesday, that it was a result of rockets misfired by Gazan terrorists.
However, one altered his report and another waited to leave Gaza because he feared retribution from Hamas.
Italian journalist Gabriele Barbati tweeted a photo on Tuesday as he went through the Erez crossing into Israel.
Barbati then he tweeted the following in Italian and English: "Out of Gaza far from Hamas retaliation: Misfired rocket killed children [yesterday] in Shati. Witness: militants rushed and cleared debris."
.
http://www.jpost.com/Operation-Protective-Edge/Journalists-threatened-by-Hamas-for-reporting-use-of-human-shields-369619
frylock
(34,825 posts)FBaggins
(26,754 posts)But they know that they can't win that way. They also know that they can't win by terrorism alone...
... they only make political progress when they can do enough damage to force a military response - and then ensure that the military response hits civilians.
We'll all just politely pretend that we didn't notice you desperately changing the subject from claims that they don't do this... to claims that they have no other choice. Shhh.
frylock
(34,825 posts)laugh it up, though. seems you're really enjoying yourself. but what's not to laugh at, what with all the senseless deaths. har har har.
FBaggins
(26,754 posts)I was laughing at you.
i did no such thing..
The shift was clear enough. Spin all you like.
frylock
(34,825 posts)I'm sorry you were incapable of seeing that. Hamas launches a rocket from a neighborhood, full of "human shields," and then splits. the IDF uses that as an excuse to level the block, and then decries the use of "human shields."
FBaggins
(26,754 posts)That canard has been tried before.. and failed.
There are lots of places in Gaza that you can fire rockets/bullets from that are not hospitals/homes/mosques/schools.
But they know that they can't do any damage to Israel that way.
Hamas launches a rocket from a neighborhood, full of "human shields," and then splits. the IDF uses that as an excuse to level the block, and then decries the use of "human shields."
You don't see that you just admitted it again... do you?
The rules of warfare do not allow Hamas to launch a rocket from a populated neighborhood. It's a war crime specifically because counter-battery fire would endanger civilians. It's the definition of using the population as human shields.
Q.E.D.
frylock
(34,825 posts)FBaggins
(26,754 posts)...what do you propose?
frylock
(34,825 posts)FBaggins
(26,754 posts)Now would you answer the question? What does "making them pay for their war crimes" mean to you?
frylock
(34,825 posts)MFM008
(19,818 posts)By the time of the most recent attacks there wasn't room to swing a cat with out hitting civilians.' Human shield' is a sad assed excuse for the Likud and IDF and lunatics in the Knesset
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025337158 calling for ethnic cleansing and worse to do their "lawn cutting". IDF Counter fire doesnt endanger innocents it blows them up.
Isreal will never be thought of in the same way as they were, not by me anyway.
King_David
(14,851 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)The US-based firm has now removed Rocket Pride by Best Arabic Games, in which players attempt to outmanoeuvre Israel's Iron Dome missile defence system, from its Google Play app store.
It also deleted Iron Dome by Gamytech, which challenged players to "intercept the rockets launched by Hamas".
Other titles that do not name the "enemy" remain online.
Advocacy groups have criticised the emergence of the genre.
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-28668325
bemildred
(90,061 posts)ROME Italian officials on Tuesday (Aug. 5) moved to expel a Moroccan imam who was caught on video inciting violence against Jews during Israels military offensive in Gaza.
Interior Minister Angelino Alfano said he had ordered the imam, Raoudi Aldelbar, to be expelled for seriously disturbing the peace, endangering national security and religious discrimination.
The imam was filmed during a Friday sermon in a mosque near Venice last month calling for Jews to be killed one by one, according to the Washington-based Middle East Media Research Institute, which published the video on its website.
Oh Allah, count them one by one and kill them all, the imam allegedly preached during the service at the mosque in the northern city of San Dona di Piave.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/religion/italy-expels-imam-for-preaching-hatred-against-jews/2014/08/05/564cc366-1cd1-11e4-9b6c-12e30cbe86a3_story.html