Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forum9 Months of Talks, 9 Months of Settlement Development....
29/4/14
During the 9 months of Secretary Kerrys efforts in the region, the Netanyahu Government promoted plans and tenders for at least 13,851 housing units in the settlements and East Jerusalem - an average of 50 units per day and 1,540 units per month.
Download as pdf
The plans were in all West Bank areas:
Plans for 4,793 units in isolated settlements (73%)
Plans for 1,768 units in settlements closer to the Green Line (27%)
The average yearly number of tenders was 4 times higher compared to previous years:
Peace Now: Not only that the construction and the announcements of settlements were destructive for the American efforts and for the faith between the two sides, it also created facts on the ground that proved more than anything else that the Netanyahu Government did not mean to go for a two states solution but rather acted in order to strengthen the Israeli control over the Occupied Territories.
Source:
http://peacenow.org.il/eng/9Months
Israeli
(4,151 posts)"" The progression of settlement building has long been a critical point of negotiation for the Palestinians, who have often refused to meet with Israeli officials unless building plans were frozen.
Peace Now also noted that the current Netanyahu government has built close to three times as many homes in the West Bank as any previous
government, including his first term in office, which ended in 1999. ""
Israeli
(4,151 posts)JP goes even further than YNET :
http://www.jpost.com/Diplomacy-and-Politics/Peace-Now-Israel-issued-tenders-for-thousands-of-settler-homes-during-talks-350742
Left wing politicians attacked the government after hearing the Peace Now numbers. This exposes the true right-wing extremist face of the government, which, over nine months of negotiations, gave a middle finger to the American government's efforts to promote talks, and broke records of building in settlements, Meretz party head Zahava Gal-On said.
"All this happened under the sponsorship of the peace-lovers [Justice Minister] Tzipi Livni and [Finance Minister] Yair Lapid, who promised their voters that they will only sit in the government to reach an agreement with the Palestinians," she added.
Gal-On said there is no way to blur the reality that the government is not interested in peace and called for Lapid to stop being a coward and block funding to settlements.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)position that both sides are equally to blame.
It's pathetic, really.
Israeli
(4,151 posts)Israel's Right wing agenda has been clear for a long time ....and its been supported by your Right wing agenda for a very long time .
America is as complicent in the occupation as we are .
So take a long hard look in the mirror .....because without American support we would not be where we are today .
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)your country..it has been apparent for a long time.
The US support for Israel with their willful blindness to the settlements and all the human rights abuses
are not exclusively held by the right wing in my country.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Too painfully true, Israeli. Without US protection and $$ Israel would never have achieved the level of colonization that it has.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)by MATT ROWLAND HILL
29 April: that was the date, according to John Kerrys initial timetable, by which an agreement to end the Israel-Palestine conflict would be signed. But it now risks going down in history for another reason: as the day the modern peace process died. The secretary of state is engaged in a race against time to persuade the sides to keep negotiating beyond the end of the month. A unity agreement between Palestinian factions Fatah and Hamas, signed this week, may have complicated his task. Nevertheless all those who, like me, believe a two-state agreement is the only way of ending Israelis and Palestinians century-long dispute will be hoping against hope that he succeeds right?
Wrong. Its time to face facts: a quarter century of on-off peace talks has left the Palestinians empty-handed, and theres no reason to believe the result will be any different this time. Consider the evidence rather than the soundbites, and its clear Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has no intention of offering the Palestinians a deal that would give them a viable state.
For a peace agreement to work, it must satisfy two fundamental conditions. First, both Israelis and Palestinians must approve it in separate referendums. If either people feels the deal is unfair, or sacrifices too many of their fundamental rights, its a non-starter. The second condition is that a peace agreement must actually bring peace. For several years after a deal is signed there will be those on both sides agitating for renewed conflict, and unless Israelis feel more secure and Palestinians more prosperous and free, new cycles of violence are bound to break out.
And heres the problem: Netanyahu wants the Palestinians to sign a one-sided deal that, even if it meets the first condition, will certainly fail the second. After spending his whole political career, including an earlier spell as prime minister, doing everything he could to oppose the two-state solution, he abruptly changed his position under severe US pressure in 2009, and since then has been saying that a negotiated deal is essential to Israels future. But even though he now talks about peace and Palestinian statehood, his understanding of those words is a long way from their usual meaning. As a result, any deal that arises from these talks will not only fail to bring justice to the Palestinians it will fail to bring lasting peace.
How do I know this? Because Netanyahu has said so again and again, to anyone who will listen. Its universally recognised by the international community, independent experts, previous Israeli leaders, and civil society groups in the US, Israel and Palestine that two essential conditions for Palestinian statehood are a capital in East Jerusalem and a border based on the 1967 line (with minor, agreed modifications). But Netanyahus Palestinian state involves neither. He said so in September 2009, in the very speech in which he reversed his long opposition to the two-state solution. He said so in May 2011, when President Obama last tried to kickstart talks between the two sides. He was still saying so in January 2013 while campaigning in the runup to the last Israeli election. And he has continued saying so while the talks sponsored by Kerry have been taking place. Its not surprising that Netanyahus father and political mentor Benzion Netanyahu said of his sons embrace of Palestinian statehood: He doesnt support it. He supports the sorts of conditions that they the Palestinians, that is would never accept.
remainder with embedded links: http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/04/25/the-day-the-modern-peace-process-died/