The rejectionist: Netanyahu and the peace talks
http://972mag.com/the-rejectionist-netanyahu-and-the-peace-talks/89379/
As the negotiations moved forward in time, not in substance Netanyahu insisted on preparing the public for failure. If he made any concessions to the American team, they remain a tightly kept secret. Netanyahu rejected the idea of a Palestinian capital in East Jerusalem, rejected Palestinian sovereignty over the Jordan Valley, rejected even symbolic recognition of the right of return (while placing a very central demand for symbolic recognition of Israel as a Jewish State).
More important, in his hostility toward the Palestinians, Netanyahu actually moved the public political barometer to the right during the negotiation period. By the time the talks broke down, if you were listening to the prime minister you would have thought that it was absolute madness to sign anything with Ramallah. Compare that to the language of partners that previous Israeli prime ministers used to describe their Palestinian counterparts, or their talk of a common future.
---
Even if talks succeed, Netanyahu has a history of not delivering his part of agreements. After he got into the Prime Ministers Office in 1996, Netanyahu refused to carry out the third and final withdrawal that Israel committed to in the second Oslo Accord. The Clinton Administration had to lead another process on the implementation of the previous agreement resulting in the Wye River Memorandum in 1998. The memorandum also had three stages; Netanayhu carried out the first and stalled on the second two, airing his old claims of Palestinian incitement and unilateralism. A certain pattern has emerged.
A couple of years later, in a private conversation with settlers, Netanyahu not knowing he was being taped explained how he used loopholes in the Oslo Accords in order to derail it. He also boasted that dealing with the American administration didnt pose a problem, because the U.S. can be easily pushed.