Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumFive positive points in Obama’s Jerusalem speech
Those statements, ideas and words, in list form:
(1) He said the words Independent Palestine twice.
(2) He called the IDF a Foreign Army in terms of its actions in Palestine.
(3) He condemned settler violence and the failure to punish it. He also spoke out against destruction of farmers land, restriction of students movement and the eviction of families.
(4) He gave credit to and noted the many young Palestinians who have rejected violence.
(5) And he said the words (a) Occupation (which was a pleasant surprise and made it such that he passed my Haiku Test) and (b) Expulsion (which was actually sort of a shock).
http://972mag.com/five-positive-points-in-obamas-jerusalem-speech/68050/
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Try to imagine for a moment what would happen if Prime Minister Netanyahu would speak before American students at Columbia University and call on them to rise up and demand that their politicians block any gun control legislation or encourage the students to act determinedly against President Obama's health care law. What an uproar such an act would have caused in the US and the world over and justifiably so. The prime minister of Israel, the headlines would say, is intervening in the most sensitive issues of American politics.
Obama took off his gloves during his speech in Jerusalem. In front of a captive and adoring audience, he called on young Israelis to wake up, stop being indifferent and take their future into their own hands. He urged them to prod their politicians into action and push them toward achieving peace with the Palestinians while not ignoring the facts related to demographics, security and the occupation. The call was perfectly packaged in thousands of beautiful words that evoked a sense of security and calm in every Israeli mainly because they were spoken by the president of the United States.
But the truth cannot be ignored: In his speech, Barack Obama encouraged the Israeli public to rebel; to rebel against the concept that has existed here for the past 20 years; rebel against the narrative of PM Netanyahu and the Right; rebel against the Barak-Sharon-Netanyahu legacy, according to which there is no one to talk to on the other side, Mahmoud Abbas is no different from Ismail Haniyeh and settlement construction must continue. Despite the expressions of fondness toward Netanyahu, the American president does not believe the Israeli leader. He does not believe his statements and does not trust his intentions vis-a-vis the Palestinian issue. Four years were enough for him to understand who he is dealing with. Even the appointment of Tzipi Livni as the head of the negotiations with the Palestinians was not enough to convince Obama that Netanyahu's position had changed.
This is why Obama bypassed Netanyahu in his speech and spoke directly to the Israeli people, right over the prime minister's head. This is who I am, Obama said, this is what I believe: I will protect and help you, but I will not cut you any slack with regards to the Palestinian issue. You, the Israelis, already have a state, and they, the Palestinians, are being smothered under the occupation. I am familiar with the excuse, Obama said between the lines. I've heard it all and I can recite the list of all the threats, disappointments and frustrations that have been accumulated over the years. But excuses are not a plan. A Palestinian state, on the other hand, is, so get moving.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4360129,00.html
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)have said imo, but I was pleasantly surprised at what he did say...on Bibi's turf.
I'm sure for Bibi the entire trip was a thrill a minute.
K&R
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)as to Obama's being a Zionist here, wonder if some minds have changed or quite what ?
King_David
(14,851 posts)More than 3,000 years ago, the Jewish people lived here, tended the land here, prayed to God here, Obama said. And after centuries of exile and persecution, unparalleled in the history of man, the founding of the Jewish State of Israel was a rebirth, a redemption unlike any in history. Today, the sons of Abraham and the daughters of Sarah are fulfilling the dream of the ages -- to be masters of their own fate in their own sovereign state.
http://touch.latimes.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-74932090/
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)But then there is always the possibility of the Hague and the international community support.
After all, you're King David.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Is that where your screen name comes from?
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)I was just wondering if your screen name was in his honor.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Thanks in advance.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)gives a better feel for what is really being said
Violet_Crumble
(35,977 posts)Some of the things Obama said in the speech about the occupations, settlements and the Palestinians is exactly the same stuff that gets some of us labelled as haters, antizionist or 'anti-Israel' here in this group. What they don't see is that there's nothing unnatural or conflicting in believing that there should be close ties with Israel and believing that Israel has as much right to exist as any other country, and admiring Israel as a country, while being critical of it for the occupation and the treatment of the Palestinian people. Those two things should go hand in hand, as the occupation is something rotten that will end up eating away at Israel all on its own, something that it's predominately American 'supporters' don't have the smarts to see...
King_David
(14,851 posts)However we do have a poster here on DU believe it or not who labels herself an antiZionist and says the most awful hateful things about what she calls "Zionists"
Violet_Crumble
(35,977 posts)I've been falsely called one quite a few times, as have others.
Also, seeing as how you defend the person who says the most hateful and awful thing about pro-Palestinians I think yr a bit selective about what bothers you....
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I am quite confident that there are posters who would embrace that label without hesitation.
Violet_Crumble
(35,977 posts)If people see themselves as antizionists, I'll take their word for it. But what I don't like is when you and others fly round this forum accusing people of being antizionists, in some cases like mine, after being told that the person they're accusing isn't an antizionist...
oberliner
(58,724 posts)At least not for me.
King_David
(14,851 posts)Violet Crumble has been accused of being an antiZionist.
Just asking because I think it would be a horrible thing to be falsely accused of and I would hope it's not something that happens here on DU.
Violet_Crumble
(35,977 posts)There's one person in this group who has repeatedly accused me of being antizionist. I remember responding to every accusation telling them I'm not, only to have them come back and repeat the accusation, and I will dig up the links if you need them, but I'll need a day or two due to work committments and DU having a crappy search engine. I've pretty much alway said that I'm not an anything when it comes to Zionist or antizionist. There are so many strains of Zionism that I relate to bits of some and recoil from others. I can also relate to some of what antizionism's about (especially when people say it's the same as postzionism), but if I was pinned to a wall and forced to say one or the other, I'd have to say I'd grudgingly identify as Zionist without the nationalistic anti-Palestinian crap I detest....
I've been accused of supporting Hamas by the same person, even though I'm an atheist and a bit of an uneducated feminist who abhores the sexism and homophobia or those sorts of religious extremists
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Would you give it high marks on the whole?
Violet_Crumble
(35,977 posts)There was reassurance that Israel is an ally, which I think is vitally important to keep on stressing, given Israel's fears, some of which are understandable. Then it was balanced out by asking Israelis to put themselves in the shoes of a Palestinian and that Palestinians have to have their own state. I didn't watch the speech, but I read the transcript, and if he was as good a public speaker as he was when he spoke here in Australia*, he did really really well as far as I'm concerned...
What did you think of it?
* I don't often react to politicians giving speeches, but I found myself grinning stupidly at the telly and a lot of my inbuilt distrust of any US politician vanished when he spoke. Such a stark contrast from Bush...
oberliner
(58,724 posts)He is indeed a strong public speaker.