Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
Fri Mar 8, 2013, 06:36 PM Mar 2013

70-strong Israeli coalition nearing completion

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has made considerable progress toward building what is set to be a 70-strong coalition, sources close to the negotiations said Friday evening. They stressed, however, that the key deals had yet to be signed, and nothing would be concrete until they were.

The coalition, set to be finalized early next week, will comprise Netanyahu’s Likud-Beytenu (31 seats), Yesh Atid (19), Jewish Home (12), Hatnua (6) and Kadima (2). Labor would lead the opposition, in which the two ultra-Orthodox parties, Shas and United Torah Judaism, would also sit, the sources said.

They added that Yesh Atid leader Yair Lapid, who had hoped to become foreign minister, will instead serve as finance minister. Jewish Home chief Naftali Bennett will be minister of trade and industry. The Foreign Ministry post will be kept open for former foreign minister Avigdor Liberman, who resigned in December to fight corruption charges and hopes to return quickly to the post after clearing his name.

The defense minister is likely to be former IDF chief of the General Staff Moshe Ya’alon (Likud), housing could well go to Jewish Home’s Uri Ariel, while the same party’s Eli Ben Dahan could take religious affairs, and Kadima leader Shaul Mofaz could become minister of welfare. Many ministerial positions, in a cabinet set to number 23-25 ministers, have yet to be finalized, the sources said.

http://www.timesofisrael.com/70-strong-israeli-coalition-nearing-completion/

Secular parties in, religious parties out. Very interesting.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
70-strong Israeli coalition nearing completion (Original Post) oberliner Mar 2013 OP
ah extremist settlers in religious folks out azurnoir Mar 2013 #1
Yeah, I agree oberliner Mar 2013 #2
You never mentioned in one of your OPs and replies if you believe a Lapid/Bennet R. Daneel Olivaw Mar 2013 #3
Crickets. R. Daneel Olivaw Mar 2013 #4
I don't really understand what your question is asking oberliner Mar 2013 #6
Can you clarify? Sure. R. Daneel Olivaw Mar 2013 #10
Still don't get it oberliner Mar 2013 #11
I think itis because sabbat hunter Mar 2013 #5
Good points oberliner Mar 2013 #7
Incorrect Israeli Mar 2013 #8
No - actually you are incorrect oberliner Mar 2013 #9
umm the article states exactly what I said sabbat hunter Mar 2013 #12
misunderstanding Israeli Mar 2013 #13
It would be a disaster for Labor and Meretz to join a coalition with Netanyahu. Ken Burch Mar 2013 #15
If Yesh is going to keep presenting itself as the party of "the secular center". Ken Burch Mar 2013 #14
What do you think Lapid's principles are? oberliner Mar 2013 #16
I'm going on the interviews he's given Ken Burch Mar 2013 #17
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
2. Yeah, I agree
Fri Mar 8, 2013, 07:10 PM
Mar 2013

It's weird - you'd think they would be natural allies, yet they are on opposite ends on the government moving forward.

The whole coalition system is very strange to me. I prefer the way we do it here in the US, personally. Though it might just be because that's what I am used to.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
3. You never mentioned in one of your OPs and replies if you believe a Lapid/Bennet
Fri Mar 8, 2013, 09:18 PM
Mar 2013

would be bad news for he religious cast in Israel.

I don't believe, as some do, that a draft and curtailing of funds to the Ultra Orthodox will be as bad as some might believe.

You?
 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
10. Can you clarify? Sure.
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 11:17 AM
Mar 2013

Last edited Sun Mar 10, 2013, 12:21 PM - Edit history (1)

You never mentioned in one of your OPs and replies if you believe a Lapid/Bennet team up would be bad news for he religious cast in Israel.

I don't believe, as some do, that a draft and curtailing of funds to the Ultra Orthodox will be as bad as some might believe.

You?

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
11. Still don't get it
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 11:37 AM
Mar 2013

What is "he religious cast in Israel" ?

I am thinking maybe "he" was supposed to be "the" but "the religious cast in Israel" still doesn't make sense to me.

Are you asking if the Lapid/Bennet alliance will hurt the ultra-Orthodox?

If so, I don't know the answer to that. I know they seem not keen on it from what I have read.

sabbat hunter

(6,829 posts)
5. I think itis because
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 10:42 PM
Mar 2013

a lot of the settlers belong to Shas or united torah.

With them out of the government, not only will you be able to push thru drafting ultra orthodox men and women, they will also be able to reduce fundings to their religions yeshivas and direct funds to more secular causes.

I would prefer to see United Jewish out and Labor and Meretz in the coalition, thereby isolating all the religious based parties to the opposition, and creating a stronger coalition.
I also do not like the fact that Bibi is being allowed to keep the foreign minister position open for Lieberman until his trial is over.

Israeli

(4,151 posts)
8. Incorrect
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 09:57 AM
Mar 2013
a lot of the settlers belong to Shas or united torah.



Think you need to re-think :
http://peacenow.org.il/eng/VotingPaterns

I would prefer to see United Jewish out and Labor and Meretz in the coalition, thereby isolating all the religious based parties to the opposition, and creating a stronger coalition.
I also do not like the fact that Bibi is being allowed to keep the foreign minister position open for Lieberman until his trial is over.


So would I but it aint gonna happen .
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
9. No - actually you are incorrect
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 10:33 AM
Mar 2013

In fact, the link that you provided supports what the other poster wrote.

To wit:

The ultraorthodox parties received an accumulated support of almost 28% (“Yahadut Hatora” – 17.1%; “Shas” – 9.5%), significantly higher than the 15% votes received by the general public.

sabbat hunter

(6,829 posts)
12. umm the article states exactly what I said
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 12:15 PM
Mar 2013
The most popular party among the setters was the “Bait Hayehudi” party, with nearly 28% of the votes, over 3 times higher than the 9% support the party received among the general Israeli public.

The ultraorthodox parties received an accumulated support of almost 28% (“Yahadut Hatora” – 17.1%; “Shas” – 9.5%), significantly higher than the 15% votes received by the general public.


Bait Hayedhudi or Jewish home is a successor to the National Religious Party. My only error was not including them in the party that the settlers belong to/vote for.


And of course if Lieberman is convicted, that will keep him out of the cabinet.



Israeli

(4,151 posts)
13. misunderstanding
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 02:32 AM
Mar 2013

I was reacting to this of yours :

Secular parties in, religious parties out


Bait Hayehudi are anything but secular .
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
15. It would be a disaster for Labor and Meretz to join a coalition with Netanyahu.
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 04:31 AM
Mar 2013

They'd have no real influence and would spend all their time voting for and defending policies that were anathema to them.
It might even split Labor again, as it did during the last Knesset.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
14. If Yesh is going to keep presenting itself as the party of "the secular center".
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 04:29 AM
Mar 2013

Lapid will really have to hold Likud's feet to the fire on doing anything more to appease the ultrareligious crazyheads...and, it may have to leave the coalition if Netanyahu stalls on the question of drafting ultra-Orthodox and getting them off of religious-based welfare payments.

My guess, however, is that Lapid will develop Barak Syndrome...refusing to stand up for any of his principles if doing so means giving up his seat at the cabinet table.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
16. What do you think Lapid's principles are?
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 04:54 AM
Mar 2013

I think maybe you give him more credit than he deserves.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
17. I'm going on the interviews he's given
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 06:30 AM
Mar 2013

And from those and from most of the articles I've seen about Lapid and his party, two of the issues they placed the strongest emphasis on during the campaign were

1)Reducing the influence of the ultrareligious and removing some of the privileges they receive(such as exemption from the draft and personal subsidies so they don't have to work);

2)defending the rights and the values of more secular Israelis.

In these areas, the party is a lineal descendant of the Shinui party that Lapid's father helped organize in the 1990's, IIRC.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»70-strong Israeli coaliti...