Israel's Goals, Hamas' Choices, and Egypt in the Middle
After six days of airstrikes against the terrorist infrastructure in Gaza, Israel faces a decision: to negotiate a cease-fire with Hamas or mount a ground operation. Today, I spoke to my BICOM colleague Michael Herzoga retired brigadier general in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) who served from 2006 to 2009 as chief of staff to Israels minister of defenseabout the framework within which that decision is being debated in the political and military leaderships.
The fundamental judgement to be made is whether the aims set by Israel for Operation Pillar of Defense have been achieved. These aims are modest in Israeli terms. The aim is not to topple Hamas. It is to restore normalcy for Israeli citizens by reinstating deterrence. To that end the IDF seeks to degrade the capability and motivation of the terrorists and deny Hamas and other armed groups in the Gaza Strip access to the long-range weapons that fell near Tel Aviv and Jerusalem last week.
Jihadi groups have mushroomed in Gaza and the Sinai. These groups reject the rules of the game and Hamas either would not or could not control them. Israel responded to these attacks and found itself in a cycle. Hamas made the decision to become involved in the attacks on Israel and claim responsibility. They pushed the envelope too hard and miscalculated badly what the Israeli response would be.
http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/blog/alan-johnson/israels-goals-hamas-choices-and-egypt-middle?