Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Violet_Crumble

(35,961 posts)
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 08:36 AM Jul 2012

Abbas: Israel’s man in Ramallah (Larry Derfner)

Since his bid for statehood ended at the UN last September, Mahmoud Abbas, president of the Palestinian Authority, has become strictly an enforcer of the occupation.

If Mahmoud Abbas had resigned as president of the Palestinian Authority last September, after the U.S. did Israel’s work and blocked the Palestinians’ UN bid for statehood, he would have accomplished something important. He would have inspired the Palestinians (like he did in his UN speech), left them with an example of integrity and shamed the West for allowing Israel to get away with the abomination it perpetrates in the West Bank and Gaza. If the PA had dissolved itself after the encounter at the UN, Israel would have suddenly had 2.5 million West Bankers on its hands with no Palestinian troops to keep them in line and no Palestinian bureaucracy to keep the economy from imploding. Abbas and Prime Minister Salam Fayyad have threatened to quit several times, and the threat of dismantling the PA and handing the job back to Israel has been raised continually, but never fulfilled. Now there are new threats, new plans to go back to the UN this September and seek recognition of Palestine not from the Security Council, where the U.S. can always veto it, but from the General Assembly, where the Palestinians can’t get anything binding but can get a large majority of votes for a symbolic victory. Unfortunately, it’s too late, and my guess is that Abbas, Fayyad and the others know it. When they decided to swallow the U.S./Israeli refusal to recognize the Palestinians’ right to independence, they lost all respect from anybody. They’re no longer advancing the Palestinian cause, they’re advancing the Israeli occupation – that’s their image now not only among Palestinians, but among everyone. A second bid for UN recognition would be a supreme example of history repeating itself, the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce.

I write this as somebody who, until this year, saw Abbas and Fayyad as the long-awaited answer to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as the Palestinian leadership Israel always claimed to be dreaming of - one that demonstrably turned away from terror and thereby proved the sincerity of its peaceful intentions. Abbas has done this for eight years. His troops have been working with, or shall we say under, the IDF and Shin Bet, they’ve arrested thousands of Hamasniks (and tortured many of them), they’ve physically prevented mass “people power” demonstrations against the IDF, the wall and the settlements. A prime example of the PA’s diligence came during Operation Cast Lead, when the West Bank was the only place in the world where Muslims weren’t protesting.

For all his strength within Fatah, Abbas owed his rise to power to George W. Bush and Condoleezza Rice, who picked him to be the moderate alternative to Arafat while the latter was living out his days in the Muqata. Abbas won the Bush administration’s patronage because he spoke out from the beginning against the extreme violence of the second intifada and Arafat’s orchestration of it. Even Moshe “Bugi” Ya’alon, the right-wing Likudnik who was then IDF chief of staff, credited Abbas as a consistent force for peace. What more could Israel want? As for Fayyad, he, too, was a favorite of the Bush administration, he’d refused to serve in a national unity government with Hamas - he’s a University of Texas-trained economist who spent his career at the U.S. Federal Reserve, World Bank and International Monetary Fund, for God’s sake. He’s a Western-oriented Palestinian technocrat. But he, like Abbas, is cynically branded a rejectionist by Israel, and Israel imposes its will on the U.S., which imposes its will on Europe, so in the absence of an Israeli partner for the two-state solution that Abbas and Fayyad seek, the only job available to them is that of occupation enforcer. And at some point after last September, they decided to accept it.

I don’t know why they don’t quit and close down the store, whether it’s that they gave up on Palestinian independence, or they just got too used to the power and perks, or they’re afraid Palestinian society will suffer too much if the PA isn’t there to provide them jobs and a funnel for foreign aid, or all of the above. But objectively, Abbas, Fayyad and the PA have become Israel’s collaborators in the occupation, and no one by now can fail to see it. Israel has “turned” them. But then Israel has turned America into its collaborator, and Europe into its tacit collaborator, so turning the PA wasn’t such a big chore.



http://972mag.com/author/larryd/
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Abbas: Israel’s man in Ramallah (Larry Derfner) (Original Post) Violet_Crumble Jul 2012 OP
The PA is quite important to Israel's security apparatus in OPT azurnoir Jul 2012 #1
That was an interesting little story about the IMF loan. nt bemildred Jul 2012 #2
Do you want the PA to quit? n/t shira Jul 2012 #3
I want Abbas to quit, like Derfner. bemildred Jul 2012 #4
Undecided there are benefits and drawbacks to both azurnoir Jul 2012 #5

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
1. The PA is quite important to Israel's security apparatus in OPT
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 01:42 PM
Jul 2012

so important that

IMF rejects Israeli request for bridge loan to PA

The Palestinian Authority is facing the worst economic crisis since its founding in 1994, the PA’s labor minister told AFP on Sunday.

Minister Ahmad Majdalani said that if Arab countries fail to follow through with their pledged aid money, the government will not be able to pay its salaries or debts.

“What is available to the Palestinian Authority at the moment in terms of funds is not enough to pay government employee salaries this month, with Ramadan approaching … It is not sufficient to pay the bills that the Palestinian Authority owes to private companies,” he said.

The International Monetary Fund recently refused an Israeli request for $1 billion in bridge loan funding for the Palestinians. The PA cannot ask the IMF for money on its own because it isn’t a state.


http://www.geneva-accord.org/mainmenu/imf-rejects-israeli-request-for-bridge-loan-to-pa

but one reading would never know this considering the number of times we see - PA/PLO/Hamas written as though they were all one and the same

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
4. I want Abbas to quit, like Derfner.
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 02:32 PM
Jul 2012

What, if anything, to do about the PA would have to be worked out after.

Can't speak for azurnoir.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
5. Undecided there are benefits and drawbacks to both
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 02:40 PM
Jul 2012

if Abbas quit that would effectively dissolve the PA and with it Oslo which IMO is not a bad thing, however at the very least the PA should hold verifiable elections soon very soon

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Abbas: Israel’s man in Ra...