Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumNetanyahu suspends diplomatic dialogue with EU
In response to EU decision to label Israeli settlement products, the prime minister instructed the Foreign Ministry to reevaluate the EU's involvement in peace efforts with the Palestinians.Itamar Eichner
Published: 11.29.15,
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu instructed the Foreign Ministry on Sunday evening to suspend contacts with European Union representatives regarding the political process with the Palestinians to protest the bloc's decision to label Israeli exports from the West Bank.
The Foreign Ministry said that Netanyahu had ordered contacts frozen until a "reassessment process is completed." It did not go into detail as to which institutions are affected.
The move came in response to a decision made by the EU to label "settlement products" produced by Israelis in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4732577,00.html
Ernesto
(5,077 posts)Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)On some products, like fruit and vegetables, the labelling referring to settlements will be mandatory, while on others it will be voluntary...
/... http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/11/eu-sets-guidelines-on-labelling-products-from-israeli-settlements
/... http://www.whoprofits.org/involvement/settlements-products
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)2naSalit
(86,650 posts)circumvent the ruling somehow.
shira
(30,109 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)so not much of a loss and any whining about it from Israel can now be easily dismissed as it was Israel who cut off contact, over honesty in labeling
Little Tich
(6,171 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)November 30, 2015
It's been a bad couple of days for relations between Israel and the European Union. On Sunday, Israel announced that it would suspend contact with EU diplomats working on the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. It threatened to go further on Monday morning: Israeli officials warned that Jerusalem might stop helping the EU's economic projects in the West Bank, making it hard for the EU to serve its Palestinian beneficiaries.
This is retaliation, pure and simple. On November 11, the EU set up guidelines requiring all Israeli products produced in West Bank settlements to be labeled as coming from a settlement rather than from Israel proper. Israel believes this rule will further enable boycotts of Israeli products, which it sees as a threat to both its economic livelihood and even more important its legitimacy in the eyes of the international community.
The economic stakes here aren't that high for Israel: Settlement-made goods are a tiny percentage of Israel-EU trade. But there's a bigger dispute underlying here: The EU and Israel disagree, fundamentally, about how to handle Israel's continued occupation of the West Bank. And as long as that disagreement exists, the relationship between Israel and its largest trading partner will be fraught.
Where the labeling fight came from
http://www.vox.com/2015/11/30/9821634/eu-israel-settlement-labels
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Back then the US and the EU had warned Israel if you don't negotiate
a peace deal this is what you'll be looking at in the future..and the
future is here now.
Obama has said we, the US, won't be able to protect Israel from
all actions that may come as a result of the continued settlement
expansion and then the failed deal.
So it looks like they're following through and I do not expect
the US to stand in the way of the EU unless Israel decides
they'll negotiate again.
I feel as you do, Israel would prefer to wait for the next US
president..one who will be more sympathetic in their minds
about the occupation.
The threat comes from the fact that Israel is being held
to account for the occupation..obviously they don't
appreciate that narrative of responsibility.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Hillary has already made overtures to Bibi
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)FBaggins
(26,748 posts)The EU exports a few billion Euros more to Israel than trade in the opposite direction, so you could say that they have slightly more "to lose"... but both sides tend to lose in a "grudge match".