Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumAn Iran-Deal Skeptic Becomes a Supporter
Earlier this year, California Representative Adam Schiff, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, told me he had serious doubts about Irans intentions as it pursued a nuclear deal with the United States and five other world powers. He also said he was somewhat worried about the scale of possible American concessions during the talks. Schiff, who I described in a post at the time as a moderates moderate, suggested to me that he wanted to see President Obama achieve an important foreign-policy success, but as a Jew, he wanted to make sure that an anti-Semitic regimeboth he and Obama agree that Iran is ruled by an anti-Semitewould not be allowed to become a nuclear-weapons state. At the time, he told me he was uncommitted and that he would remain uncommitted until he had time to review a final deal, should a final deal materialize.
Well, the final deal has materialized, and Schiff, in a telephone call over the weekend, told me that, based on an extensive review, he has decided to come out in favor of the deal. He said he plans to formally announce his support later on Monday, but that he has already informed the White House of his intentions. His decision should carry some weight with national security-minded Democrats, and with still-undecided members of the House Jewish caucus.
In our conversation, Schiff told me wants to see Obama and Congress work together to strengthen key aspects of the dealmost notably, he wants the administration to promise Iran that the United States will have zero tolerance for any instances of Iranian cheating. But he said he believes the deal could serve its stated purpose: to keep Iran south of the nuclear threshold.
At the end of the day, I could not find an alternative that would turn out in a better way than the deal, he said. Rejection of the deal would not lead to something credible. And I think that there are enough ways to mitigate the risks associated with the deal that it makes sense to me to move forward. He went on, The risks associated with rejection of the deal are quite a bit higher than the risks associated with going forward.
http://www.defenseone.com/politics/2015/08/iran-deal-skeptic-becomes-supporter/118810/?oref=d_brief_nl
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)juxtaposing opponents' whining about Iran getting a bomb in 10 years! with all the speeches (going back to the early nineties I believe) shouting from the rooftops about Iran getting a bomb in a year!
bemildred
(90,061 posts)So I was curious to see where he came down, and glad to see how he did come down. He always seemed like a serious person to me.