Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumNetanyahu backs ‘general idea’ behind Arab Peace Initiative
While stopping short of fully endorsing the Arab Peace Initiative, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday that he welcomed the general idea behind it a regional agreement between Israel and the moderate Arab states.
The Arab Peace Initiative, originally proposed by Saudi Arabia in 2002, has many problematic aspects to it, the prime minister said, such as its call for an Israeli withdrawal from the Golan Heights and the return of Palestinians refuges to Israel. There are positive aspects and negative aspects to it, he told Israeli diplomatic correspondents at a rare on-record briefing. This initiative is 13 years old, and the situation in the Middle East has changed since it was first proposed. But the general idea to try and reach understandings with leading Arab countries is a good idea.
In the framework proposed by the initiative, all Arab and Islamic states would establish normal diplomatic relations with Israel after the successful conclusion of the peace process with the Palestinians. The Israeli government has never fully endorsed the plan. But Netanyahu has repeatedly stated that given Irans nuclear and regional aspirations, the moderate Arab states and Israel have a common enemy and grounds for increased cooperation.
more...
http://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-endorses-general-idea-behind-arab-peace-initiative/
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)'Cause once parsed, Mr. Bibbles is basically saying "I like the idea of it, except for all the ideas in it."
His rejection of a return of the Golan is interesting. Since of course, an end to that occupation is conditional on peace with syria - peace that would be achieved in this agreement.
shira
(30,109 posts)...or the Iranian Revolutionary Guard to perch themselves in an area overlooking Israel's populated areas is suicidal.
Besides, Ehud Barak offered to withdraw from the Golan in exchange for peace back in 2000, and he was utterly rejected.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Israel always has an excuse for its violation of law and ethics. It's like a five year old who always has an explanation for why the DVD player is full of ketchup or the little sibling ha a new haircut.
shira
(30,109 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Make up your mind, is it "suicide" to ever end the occupation of Golan, or should it be ended through treaty?
shira
(30,109 posts)....they'd be peaceful once the Arab Peace Initiative is implemented?
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Olmert was not going to cede all of the territory back to Syria. He wanted Israel to keep the northeastern Galilee shore. The trouble there is of course, that's as much part of Syria as the rest of Golan. Understandably Syria was not real interested in this "offer" as it amounted to Olmert offering to give Syria a piece of Syria in exchange for another piece of Syria - and the part Israel wanted to keep is actually pretty vital to Syria, what with you know, fresh water being a little hard to come by in the region.
However, talks over the issue resumed in 2003 through Turkish mediators, until Barack's resignation in 2008. Netanyahu came in and shut down the process.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)So I think it is most likely a moot point now.