Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 09:54 PM Mar 2014

Why is America Anxiously Demanding that Japan Return Nuclear Materials?

As soon as the U.S. demanded from Japan that they return nuclear materials, the announcement drew rapt attention from the worldwide community. At the same time it also left people feeling baffled — why has the U.S. has been giving plutonium to Japan for decades, and why is it now suddenly demanding that it all be returned? Ultimately, what is the connection between the U.S. and Japan where these nuclear issues are concerned? In truth, these affairs stem from the U.S. re-evaluating its position toward Japan with regard to America's nuclear umbrella policy.

The nuclear umbrella policy is a promise made by the U.S. to its allies. During the Cold War period, the U.S. nuclear umbrella covered America's staunchest supporters, which included those in the NATO alliance as well as South Korea and Japan. After the conclusion of the Cold War, America's nuclear umbrella remained an important cornerstone in maintaining relations with its friends and allies; in fact, the trend has actually been to prolong the policy's existence. In January 1965, when Japan's Prime Minister Eisaku Sato visited Washington, the U.S. president at the time, Lyndon B. Johnson, told him that "Japan has no need for nuclear weapons because the U.S. already has them. Should Japan ever need to be defended or need to contain nuclear weapons, the U.S. promises to supply them."* This statement is a concrete example of a top level bilateral arrangement made between the U.S. and Japan concerning the nuclear umbrella policy. In December of 1967, Prime Minister Eisaku Sato made his famous announcement at Japan's National Parliament, stating Japan's Three Non-Nuclear Principles of non-possession, non-production, and non-introduction of nuclear weapons. This became Japan's founding policy regarding nuclear arms. The nuclear umbrella and the Three Non-Nuclear Principles are not in contradiction with one another — the former is the cause, the latter is the result. In South Korea, the U.S. also put into effect a similar nuclear umbrella policy. According to the U.S. and South Korean agreement of 1978, the US-ROK Mutual Defense Treaty, America has promised that it will defend South Korea as part of its nuclear umbrella. This promise remains in place, even today.

In truth, America's intentions in providing a nuclear umbrella have been, without question, to prevent Japan and Korea from possessing nuclear arms. At the same time, come any nuclear attack on Japan, the U.S. would be personally committed to protecting it. From this perspective, we can say that the U.S. nuclear umbrella policy was formulated with the idea of maintaining America's nuclear monopoly throughout the world. But this policy, aimed at stopping the rise in the number of nuclear capable countries and the spread of nuclear weapons throughout the world, did have a positive effect. This is especially evident where preventing nuclear weapons from falling into the hands of those seeking to revive Japan's militarism has been concerned — here it has been a crucial strategic move. Japan, South Korea and other countries that are still operating within a no-nuclear weapons framework cannot neglect the checking power that the United States' nuclear umbrella holds over them.

However, America's nuclear umbrella policy also has some seriously exploitable points within it. Its greatest weakness comes from this: The U.S. and Japan are not united on the execution of the Three Non-Nuclear Principles, and in some important areas of concern they even contradict one another. To give an example, the U.S. once entrusted Japan with processing nuclear waste materials. Another case in point: During joint military exercises with Japan and South Korea, the U.S. does not refrain from transporting, possessing and installing any nuclear arsenal. The most frightening thing of all is that the U.S. and Japan have a "secret agreement" to directly transport nuclear weapons within Japan's borders.

http://watchingamerica.com/News/234067/why-is-america-anxiously-demanding-that-japan-return-nuclear-materials/

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why is America Anxiously Demanding that Japan Return Nuclear Materials? (Original Post) bemildred Mar 2014 OP
Shameless kick. nt bemildred Mar 2014 #1
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»Why is America Anxiously ...