Foreign Affairs
Related: About this forumA Way Out of the Crisis
In the village of Glebovka, on a road leading to the old hunting grounds of ex-Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, there is a small enclave of villas. Here, in the deep forest by the shores of the Kyiv water reservoir, sits a guest house that belongs to former Rada Deputy Mykola Martynenko, where confidential meetings between Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk and Ukraines wealthiest businessman Rinat Akhmetov took place.
Akhmetov was the chief political partner of Yanukovych and is now tacitly the strongest ally of Yatsenyuk, who faces increasing calls for his resignation. For two years, the prime minister has staunchly supported the interests of Akhmetov, which has brought him into direct conflict with Energy Minister Volodymyr Demchyshin. One conflict concerns Energorynok, the state company for wholesale trade with electricity, over which Yatsenyuk is considered to have substantial influence. It is alleged to have been paying for electricity produced and consumed in Ukraines occupied territories contrary to the restrictions imposed by Ukraines National Security Council.
This is just one of many examples of how Yatsenyuk governs the country according to the interests of business clans. During his premiership, Ukraine has failed to dispel the oligarchs influence on the economy. The governments only major accomplishment has been reforms in the gas market, which were carried out by Andriy Kobolev, the head of state energy company Naftogaz Ukraine, and his team, who managed to maneuver and balance the interests of Martynenko, Rada Deputy Ihor Kononenko, ex-Deputy Ihor Eremeev, and oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky.
Yatsenyuk has lost the support of the citizens, the Rada, and foreign investors. Still he continues to exercise pressure on the country, threating to pull the Peoples Front out of the governing coalition if parliament removes him from office. Early elections that would be called in such a circumstance may not spell trouble for Yatsenyuks closest ally, parliamentarian Andriy Ivanchuk, who has already moved his family to Monaco. However, for millions of his compatriots, early elections threaten to halt reforms for several months, break the countrys program with the International Monetary Fund, and reinforce populism and militarization in society.
http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/a-way-out-of-the-crisis
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Nuland's Cookies grow stale?
Good Read..
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Last edited Wed Feb 17, 2016, 10:56 AM - Edit history (2)
It's old news now, Ukraine, but what I do see is kind of like nobody is in charge, or wants to be either. It's like a big family and they all hate each other for things they did to each other in childhood.
But Yats survived the vote of no-confidence today, so apparently he is still the best Ukraine can do.
Saakashvili pops up now and then too, usually as the object of fear and loathing and arrest warrants.
Moldova seems to be melting down, somebody ran off with a billion or so.
There are some indications that certain parties want to warm the Ukraine dispute up again, but they don't seem to get much traction, it's been quiet this Winter, relatively speaking.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)But, then he still has powerful interests behind him.
The way this year is going, with tensions everywhere...I expect things will start to get tense late March onward?
That deal Russia coordinated to try to stabilize the oil prices may go well, or not. The U.S. Stock Market thought it good news today...but, there are just too many problems in our Global Economy not to expect something brewing where things get rougher going forward. So much is topsy, turvy in our world these days. Or as Rumsfeld said: "the Un-known, Knowns..etc..gibberish.
Just my gloomy view from rummaging around.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)But probably not. I'd expect they'd be fighting now, in fact they are a little, now until the ground melts. But the weather is kind of unpredictable too, so ...
I know there were concerns about the winter wheat crop, which has ramifications in MENA and elsewhere.
That OPEC oil deal is not what they say, it is an agreement to maintain production, which is most unlikely to raise prices, there is already a huge glut, and Iran wants to add to it. I can think of various theories about why they might want to do that, maintain the glut, but none of them are particularly convincing. Maybe it's Putin doing a favor to the Sauds to weaken Iran or something, see? Playing them against each other. But no evidence whatsoever for that. All we have is that oxymoronic statement about maintaining production to stabilize prices. Right.
The stock markets have been exciting, I'm glad I'm not involved in that. I think I'd go nuts worrying about it.
But hey, Scalia is dead, he could not have picked a better time to get out of the way, too.
Thanks for the clarification on the oil "deal."
Agree ...it doesn't make sense. Who knows what they are up to. I see Obama and Kerry starting the harsh Russia warnings again and makes me wonder why. Maybe its political to help Hillary or they have some other strategy.
I know its said to be unkind to talk ill of the dead. But, there are just some greedy devils that deserve it...along with the talk of a "stake in the heart" so they don't rise again. I'm amazed that Cheney with his many heart devices is still around. It's uncanny. To say nothing of Kissinger who has been very overweight all of his 92 years. It must go beyond just "good genes."
Just be glad he's dead. The best revenge is living well and forgetting he ever existed.
"I'll dance on your grave." Fuck yeah.