Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,900 posts)
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 08:59 PM Mar 2013

Kerry voices conditional U.S. support for U.N. arms treaty

Source: Reuters

Kerry voices conditional U.S. support for U.N. arms treaty

By Louis Charbonneau
UNITED NATIONS | Fri Mar 15, 2013 6:23pm EDT

(Reuters) - Secretary of State John Kerry voiced his support on Friday for an international treaty to regulate the $70 billion global arms trade, but restated Washington's "red line," affirming that it will not accept limits on U.S. domestic gun ownership.

The U.N. General Assembly voted in December to hold a final round of negotiations March 18-28 on what could become the first international treaty to regulate international weapons transfers after a drafting conference in July 2012 collapsed because the United States and others wanted more time.

Arms control campaigners say one person every minute dies worldwide as a result of armed violence and a convention is needed to prevent the unregulated and illicit flow of weapons into conflict zones fueling wars and atrocities.

"The United States is steadfast in its commitment to achieve a strong and effective Arms Trade Treaty that helps address the adverse effects of the international arms trade on global peace and stability," Kerry said in a statement.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/15/us-arms-treaty-usa-idUSBRE92E12N20130315
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kerry voices conditional U.S. support for U.N. arms treaty (Original Post) Eugene Mar 2013 OP
Would it follow from that dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #1
That would depend on what "regulate" means, I doubt it means no arms trade at all. bemildred Mar 2013 #2
I meant dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #3

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
1. Would it follow from that
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 09:11 PM
Mar 2013

any international aid the US provides would no longer be in the from of arms of any description ?

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
2. That would depend on what "regulate" means, I doubt it means no arms trade at all.
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 08:37 AM
Mar 2013

It's probably more about trying to put the free-lancers out of business, always a noble goal for current rulers, as protection of incumbency is for the currently elected in our politics.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»Kerry voices conditional ...